<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>EveryJoe &#187; Live.com / MSN</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.everyjoe.com/tag/msn/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.everyjoe.com</link>
	<description>Sports News - Tech Reviews - Entertainment - Life Tips for EveryJoe</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 20:40:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>How about Some Digsby Love?</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/how-about-some-digsby-love/</link>
		<comments>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/how-about-some-digsby-love/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 11:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Milo Riano</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AIM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digsby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Talk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[instant messaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jabber]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Live.com / MSN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Meebo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/how-about-some-digsby-love/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am currently using Meebo to login to various instant messaging applications namely Yahoo, MSN &#38; AOL. While I am satisfied in general, being able to add other applications from a single application interface is far better.
 
Digsby is a wonderful application which allows you to manage your instant messaging, email notifications, &#38; social networking applications from a single interface.
Instant Messaging
digsby is a multiprotocol IM client which allows you to chat with your friends or contact lists on AIM, MSN, Yahoo, ICQ, Google Talk, and Jabber.
Email Notifications
digsby is an email notification tool which alerts you of incoming email and allows [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/how-about-some-digsby-love/">How about Some Digsby Love?</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am currently using Meebo to login to various instant messaging applications namely <a href="http://www.techticles.com/tag/yahoo" target="_blank">Yahoo</a>, MSN &amp; AOL. While I am satisfied in general, being able to add other applications from a single application interface is far better.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/files/2009/07/image30.png"><img height="135" alt="image" src="http://www.everyjoe.com/files/2009/07/image-thumb29.png" width="136" border="0" /></a> </p>
<p>Digsby is a wonderful application which allows you to manage your instant messaging, email notifications, &amp; social networking applications from a single interface.</p>
<p><strong>Instant Messaging</strong></p>
<p>digsby is a multiprotocol IM client which allows you to chat with your friends or contact lists on AIM, MSN, Yahoo, ICQ, Google Talk, and Jabber.</p>
<p><strong>Email Notifications</strong></p>
<p>digsby is an email notification tool which alerts you of incoming email and allows you to perform actions such as &#8216;Delete&#8217; or &#8216;Report Spam&#8217; with just one click.</p>
<p><strong>Social Networking</strong></p>
<p>digsby is a social networking tool which alerts you of incoming messages or other events and gives you a live Newsfeed of what your friends are doing.</p>
<p><em>Go ahead and give </em><a href="http://www.digsby.com" target="_blank"><em>Digsby</em></a><em> a spin.</em></p>
<p><em>Image source from </em><a href="http://www.digsby.com" target="_blank"><em>Digsby</em></a><em>.</em></p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/how-about-some-digsby-love/">How about Some Digsby Love?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/how-about-some-digsby-love/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What&#8217;s the Latest in Microsoft Yahoo Deal</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/whats-the-latest-in-microsoft-yahoo-deal-46/</link>
		<comments>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/whats-the-latest-in-microsoft-yahoo-deal-46/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 06:32:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Noel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Live.com / MSN]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineherald.com/whats-the-latest-in-microsoft-yahoo-deal/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I found this video in youtube.   Apparently, Microsoft gave Yahoo only 24 hours to respond with the offer.   I think that&#8217;s absurd.   It takes quite a while for the board to discuss such things.
Nevertheless, I still wanted the deal to push through.   Unfortunately I don&#8217;t have any yahoo shares.  Too bad.

Post from: EveryJoe
What&#8217;s the Latest in Microsoft Yahoo Deal
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/whats-the-latest-in-microsoft-yahoo-deal-46/">What&#8217;s the Latest in Microsoft Yahoo Deal</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found this video in youtube.   Apparently, Microsoft gave Yahoo only 24 hours to respond with the offer.   I think that&#8217;s absurd.   It takes quite a while for the board to discuss such things.</p>
<p>Nevertheless, I still wanted the deal to push through.   Unfortunately I don&#8217;t have any yahoo shares.  Too bad.</p>
<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/nRTaI7buuLQ"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/nRTaI7buuLQ" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/whats-the-latest-in-microsoft-yahoo-deal-46/">What&#8217;s the Latest in Microsoft Yahoo Deal</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/whats-the-latest-in-microsoft-yahoo-deal-46/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft Withrew its $47.5 Billion Bid over Yahoo!</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/microsoft-withrew-its-475-billion-bid-over-yahoo-46/</link>
		<comments>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/microsoft-withrew-its-475-billion-bid-over-yahoo-46/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 14:06:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Noel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Live.com / MSN]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineherald.com/2008/05/05/microsoft-withrew-its-475-billion-bid-over-yahoo/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is all over the place.   Microsoft Withrew its bid over yahoo.   Yahoo&#8217;s share price is  around $22 at premarket trading.  According to news.com,  yahoo is willing to negotiate at $37 but Microsoft didn&#8217;t bite.
I think there would be a lot of  mad Yahoo shareholders.
Check these out for more
eweek.com 
reuters.com
pcworld
So what do you think?    Did  Microsoft did the right thing?   Should  yahoo shareholders blame their board for this decision?  Did yahoo played too much hard to get?
Post from: EveryJoe
Microsoft Withrew its $47.5 Billion Bid over Yahoo!
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/microsoft-withrew-its-475-billion-bid-over-yahoo-46/">Microsoft Withrew its $47.5 Billion Bid over Yahoo!</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is all over the place.   Microsoft Withrew its bid over yahoo.   Yahoo&#8217;s share price is  around $22 at premarket trading.  According to <a href="http://www.news.com/8301-13860_3-9935445-56.html?tag=nefd.lede">news.com</a>,  yahoo is willing to negotiate at $37 but Microsoft didn&#8217;t bite.</p>
<p>I think there would be a lot of  mad Yahoo shareholders.</p>
<p>Check these out for more</p>
<p><a href="http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Enterprise-Apps/Yahoos-Yang-Rallies-His-Troops/">eweek.com </a></p>
<p><a href="http://news.google.com/news/url?sa=t&amp;ct=us/1-0&amp;fp=481f35c035d67919&amp;ei=SQ0fSMieKKTk6gPizpHfCg&amp;url=http%3A//www.reuters.com/article/marketsNews/idUSN0536341720080505&amp;cid=1156009064&amp;usg=AFrqEzdWyZkcE0Zu8_5iX7j9aHDN2EBjGg">reuters.com</a></p>
<p><a href="http://news.google.com/news/url?sa=t&amp;ct=us/2-3&amp;fp=481f35c035d67919&amp;ei=SQ0fSMieKKTk6gPizpHfCg&amp;url=http%3A//www.pcworld.com/article/id%2C145477-c%2Cinternet/article.html&amp;cid=1156137789&amp;usg=AFrqEzfR8yUmvk-wC7Qnn1witQzgDGRLrg">pcworld</a></p>
<p>So what do you think?    Did  Microsoft did the right thing?   Should  yahoo shareholders blame their board for this decision?  Did yahoo played too much hard to get?</p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/microsoft-withrew-its-475-billion-bid-over-yahoo-46/">Microsoft Withrew its $47.5 Billion Bid over Yahoo!</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/microsoft-withrew-its-475-billion-bid-over-yahoo-46/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft Goes Head to Head with Google for Web Based Applications</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/microsoft-goes-head-to-head-with-google-for-web-based-applications-46/</link>
		<comments>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/microsoft-goes-head-to-head-with-google-for-web-based-applications-46/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 06:35:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Noel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[live workspace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Live.com / MSN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft office live workspace]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineherald.com/2008/03/04/microsoft-goes-head-to-head-with-google-for-web-based-applications/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT) used to dominate the world of applications.  Later on,  Google, the search engine giant took on Microsoft with web based applications called Google Apps.   Now, Microsoft is taking it all back with its Microsoft Office Live Workspace.
Apart from MS Office applications,  Microsoft also included web based Exchange.   This means companies no longer need to &#8220;host&#8221; these applications on site spending huge amounts on server, licenses, and electricity.  This is truly Saas (Software As A Service).
Right now,  Microsoft Office Live workspace is FREE.  Yup, according to its FAQ, [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/microsoft-goes-head-to-head-with-google-for-web-based-applications-46/">Microsoft Goes Head to Head with Google for Web Based Applications</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT) used to dominate the world of applications.  Later on,  Google, the search engine giant took on Microsoft with web based applications called Google Apps.   Now, Microsoft is taking it all back with its <a href="http://workspace.officelive.com/">Microsoft Office Live Workspace.</a></p>
<p>Apart from MS Office applications,  Microsoft also included web based Exchange.   This means companies no longer need to &#8220;host&#8221; these applications on site spending huge amounts on server, licenses, and electricity.  This is truly Saas (Software As A Service).</p>
<p>Right now,  Microsoft Office Live workspace is FREE.  Yup, according to its FAQ, it may include advertising in the future (which is ok since they need to somehow monetize it).</p>
<p>Whatever happens, I think this new offering by Microsoft is going to be a big plus and a big win for all consumers.</p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/microsoft-goes-head-to-head-with-google-for-web-based-applications-46/">Microsoft Goes Head to Head with Google for Web Based Applications</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/microsoft-goes-head-to-head-with-google-for-web-based-applications-46/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AOL Joins the Game</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/aol-joins-the-game-46/</link>
		<comments>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/aol-joins-the-game-46/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 05:57:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Noel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AOL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Live.com / MSN]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineherald.com/2008/02/17/aol-joins-the-game/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AOL now joins the game.  According to the Press Association, whose website is hosted in google,  AOL&#8217;s advisers met with representatives from Yahoo to see if a deal is workable.
There is no definite terms available yet as of now.
One thing for sure is that Yahoo has choices apart from the one given by Microsoft.  In fact even Rupert Murdoch&#8217;s News Corp also offered to buy  20%  of yahoo.
So far, based on comments and buzz over the internet,  some of Yahoo&#8217;s shareholders prefer the deal offered by Microsoft.
[via telegraph.co.uk ]
Post from: EveryJoe
AOL Joins the Game
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/aol-joins-the-game-46/">AOL Joins the Game</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.everyjoe.com/files/46/2008/02/aollogo.jpg" alt="aol logo" align="left" />AOL now joins the game.  According to the <a href="http://ukpress.google.com/article/ALeqM5jvY96kTrvYbN4Mko34YzxgG3-B5w">Press Association</a>, whose website is hosted in google,  AOL&#8217;s advisers met with representatives from Yahoo to see if a deal is workable.</p>
<p>There is no definite terms available yet as of now.</p>
<p>One thing for sure is that Yahoo has choices apart from the one given by Microsoft.  In fact even Rupert Murdoch&#8217;s News Corp also offered to buy  20%  of yahoo.</p>
<p>So far, based on comments and buzz over the internet,  some of Yahoo&#8217;s shareholders prefer the deal offered by Microsoft.</p>
<p>[via <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/money/main.jhtml?view=DETAILS&amp;grid=&amp;xml=/money/2008/02/17/cnaol117.xml">telegraph.co.uk</a> ]</p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/aol-joins-the-game-46/">AOL Joins the Game</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/aol-joins-the-game-46/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Yahoo Rejects Microsoft $44.6 Billion Offer</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/yahoo-rejects-microsoft-446-billion-offer-46/</link>
		<comments>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/yahoo-rejects-microsoft-446-billion-offer-46/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 16:02:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Noel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Live.com / MSN]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineherald.com/2008/02/11/yahoo-rejects-microsoft-446-billion-offer/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yahoo (NASDAQ: YHOO) has just rejected the $44.6 Billion offer made by Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT).     Yahoo wants at least $40 a share.
From Bloomberg&#8217;s website it seems like Google (NASDAQ: GOOG) is proposing a partnership with Yahoo.
&#8220;Google CEO Eric Schmidt contacted Yang to suggest a partnership, the New York Times reported Feb. 4. A partnership with Mountain View, California-based Google may allow Yahoo to outsource its search service, shedding the costs of running its own search engine and sharing ad revenue with its larger rival.&#8221;
This is getting to be more interesting.   I can&#8217;t pretty much [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/yahoo-rejects-microsoft-446-billion-offer-46/">Yahoo Rejects Microsoft $44.6 Billion Offer</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.everyjoe.com/files/46/2008/02/yahoo-logo.jpg" alt="yahoo logo" align="left" />Yahoo (NASDAQ: YHOO) has just rejected the $44.6 Billion offer made by Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT).     Yahoo wants at least $40 a share.</p>
<p>From Bloomberg&#8217;s website it seems like Google (NASDAQ: GOOG) is proposing a partnership with Yahoo.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Google CEO Eric Schmidt contacted Yang to suggest a partnership, the New York Times reported Feb. 4. A partnership with Mountain View, California-based Google may allow Yahoo to outsource its search service, shedding the costs of running its own search engine and sharing ad revenue with its larger rival.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>This is getting to be more interesting.   I can&#8217;t pretty much say what would be Yahoo&#8217;s play this time.  Could it be that Yahoo is testing if they can get more from Microsoft?    If you think about it,  who needs who?   On the search front,  I definitely believe that Microsoft needs Yahoo more than the other way around.</p>
<p>Now with regards to the move by Google CEO to suggest a partnership, it might cause worry since it will basically give rise to a search engine monopoly.  That would definitely be a big issue.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s get a feel of what others think about this issue.   If you  were Yahoo, what would you do and why?   There&#8217;s no right or wrong answer here folks.   Just go ahead and share your opinion.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s start with my opinion on this.    If I were a stockholder of Yahoo,  I would definitely want to earn as much money immediately from this deal.  If you look at <a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NASDAQ:YHOO">Yahoo&#8217;s stock prices</a> over the last 5 years,  the highest so far was last Jan 6, 2006 which was 43.31  then it was primarily downhill from then.</p>
<p>A Microsoft-Yahoo  acquisition would definitely be a good idea to give balance to the continually rising marketshare of Google.  I don&#8217;t think Microsoft or Yahoo can do it by themselves separately but together, I definitely think there is a bigger chance.</p>
<p>How about you?  What do you think?</p>
<p>[via<a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=ajCAo48EKRpI&amp;refer=home"> bloomberg </a>]</p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/yahoo-rejects-microsoft-446-billion-offer-46/">Yahoo Rejects Microsoft $44.6 Billion Offer</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/yahoo-rejects-microsoft-446-billion-offer-46/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft + Yahoo  vs  Google</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/microsoft-yahoo-vs-google-46/</link>
		<comments>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/microsoft-yahoo-vs-google-46/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 02:03:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Noel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Live.com / MSN]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineherald.com/2008/02/03/microsoft-yahoo-vs-google/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Microsoft Corporation (NASDAQ: MSFT)  gave a $44.6 billion cash and stock bid for Yahoo Inc. (NASDAQ: YHOO).     This was the big news this weekend.
Among the 3 biggest search engines,  Microsoft&#8217;s MSN.com/Live.com was the third.   So far it simply can&#8217;t make a scratch to regain some of it&#8217;s search market share.    Now that Google Inc. (NASDAQ: GOOG) is getting into Microsoft&#8217;s turf with free online applications rivalring MS Office,  they need to do something about it.
Yahoo on the other hand is the biggest contender of Google but still lacks [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/microsoft-yahoo-vs-google-46/">Microsoft + Yahoo  vs  Google</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft Corporation (NASDAQ: MSFT)  gave a $44.6 billion cash and stock bid for Yahoo Inc. (NASDAQ: YHOO).     This was the big news this weekend.</p>
<p>Among the 3 biggest search engines,  Microsoft&#8217;s MSN.com/Live.com was the third.   So far it simply can&#8217;t make a scratch to regain some of it&#8217;s search market share.    Now that Google Inc. (NASDAQ: GOOG) is getting into Microsoft&#8217;s turf with free online applications rivalring MS Office,  they need to do something about it.</p>
<p>Yahoo on the other hand is the biggest contender of Google but still lacks some of the technologies that google has.  Google has been dominating the world of PPC with adsense and yahoo up until now hasn&#8217;t rolled out its international PPC platform to rival google&#8217;s adsense/adwords.</p>
<p>I think both Microsoft and Yahoo needed each other.   This Microsoft + Yahoo move would produce a really big threat to Google.    In fact,  Google is  <a href="http://money.cnn.com/news/newsfeeds/articles/newstex/AFX-0013-22742840.htm">starting to criticize the deal.</a></p>
<p>The balance of search engine dominance must be preserved.   A lot of people were affected by &#8220;rules&#8221; being set by google specifically with regards to penalties imposed on sites sellling advertising.   The whole link advertising economy was shattered by this move.</p>
<p>If the acquisition pushes through I just hope that it would not create another &#8220;monster&#8221;.</p>
<p>So what do you guys think?  Are you in favor of the Microsoft-Yahoo acquisition?</p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/microsoft-yahoo-vs-google-46/">Microsoft + Yahoo  vs  Google</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/microsoft-yahoo-vs-google-46/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Yahoo Delivers the Most Satisfaction</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/yahoo-delivers-the-most-satisfaction-46/</link>
		<comments>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/yahoo-delivers-the-most-satisfaction-46/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 21:36:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gilad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[A9 Amazon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Live.com / MSN]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineherald.com/2007/08/14/yahoo-delivers-the-most-satisfaction/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a recent survey held by University of Michigan&#8217;s American Customer Satisfaction Index, or ACSI, on customer satisfaction Yahoo came on top with a score of 79 while Google scored only 78 in a surver that asked people about to report on Web search services, portals, online news and information.
Yahoo&#8217;s score shows a 4 point improvement over last year while Google dropped 4 points. Microsoft improved 1 point to 75 and ASK with 75 points as well saw the most growth with 6 points: 
&#8220;Ask.com is making huge inroads on the other competitors in the portal and search engine category,&#8221; [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/yahoo-delivers-the-most-satisfaction-46/">Yahoo Delivers the Most Satisfaction</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>In a recent survey held by University of Michigan&#8217;s American Customer Satisfaction Index, or ACSI, on customer satisfaction Yahoo came on top with a score of 79 while Google scored only 78 in a surver that asked people about to report on Web search services, portals, online news and information.</strong></p>
<p>Yahoo&#8217;s score shows a 4 point improvement over last year while Google dropped 4 points. Microsoft improved 1 point to 75 and ASK with 75 points as well saw the most growth with 6 points: </p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;<em>Ask.com is making huge inroads on the other competitors in the portal and search engine category,</em>&#8221; said Larry Freed, Chief Executive of ForeSee Results, a closely-held company that provided the model for the report, in a prepared release.</p></blockquote>
<p>Overall I was surprised by people satisfaction from Google. Surely the media hype around it had helped but still I thought it would rank lower than it did. Luckily for Google by next year&#8217;s survey people will forget about <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/2007/08/13/google-gives-up-on-video-sales/">this slap</a> in <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/2007/08/14/major-criticism-for-googles-video-shut-down/">the face</a> which it delivered to its users this week.</p>
<p><small>[via <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/story.aspx?guid=%7B7196ABC1%2D71F5%2D4AF8%2DB490%2D58A8F87E4558%7D&#038;siteid=rss">MARKETWATCH</a>]</small></p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/yahoo-delivers-the-most-satisfaction-46/">Yahoo Delivers the Most Satisfaction</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/yahoo-delivers-the-most-satisfaction-46/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Engines Comment on their Own Privacy</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/engines-comment-on-their-own-privacy-46/</link>
		<comments>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/engines-comment-on-their-own-privacy-46/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 20:35:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gilad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AOL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Live.com / MSN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy-Issues]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineherald.com/2007/08/13/engines-comment-on-their-own-privacy/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last week CNET News.com sent 8 questions to each search engine in an attempt to rank them based on their own observation of themselves. This is in an attempt to help people understand the different policies used by each engine on specific issues. The engines included AOL, Ask.com, Google, Microsoft, and Yahoo and the questions asked included:

What search-related data&#8211;including IP addresses, cookie IDs, user identities, and search terms&#8211;do you retain?
How long do you retain those data? 
If you retain data for a limited period of time, is it completely deleted (in such a way that the data and backups cannot [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/engines-comment-on-their-own-privacy-46/">Engines Comment on their Own Privacy</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Last week CNET News.com sent 8 questions to each search engine in an attempt to rank them based on their own <a href="http://news.com.com/In+their+own+words+Search+engines+on+privacy/2100-1029_3-6202047.html">observation of themselves</a>.</strong> This is in an attempt to help people understand the different policies used by each engine on specific issues. The engines included AOL, Ask.com, Google, Microsoft, and Yahoo and the questions asked included:</p>
<blockquote><ul>
<li>What search-related data&#8211;including IP addresses, cookie IDs, user identities, and search terms&#8211;do you retain?</li>
<li>How long do you retain those data? </li>
<li>If you retain data for a limited period of time, is it completely deleted (in such a way that the data and backups cannot be recovered, even under court order) or is it anonymized instead?</li>
<li>If the data are anonymized, exactly how do you do this?</li>
<li>Do you do behavioral targeting, meaning showing ads to users based on their behavior across multiple queries?</li>
<li>If you do, is there a way for users to opt out of behavioral targeting?</li>
<li>Do you use knowledge about your users (such as ZIP code, e-mail address, gender, or birth date) obtained through user registration to deliver targeted ads on your search engine?</li>
<li>Do you use knowledge about the identities of your users&#8217; instant messaging or e-mail correspondents when using those services, or the contents of those communications, to deliver targeted ads on your search engine?</li>
</ul>
</blockquote>
<p>Interesting stuff&#8230;</p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/engines-comment-on-their-own-privacy-46/">Engines Comment on their Own Privacy</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/engines-comment-on-their-own-privacy-46/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Analytics Keeps Dissapointing</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/google-analytics-keeps-dissapointing-46/</link>
		<comments>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/google-analytics-keeps-dissapointing-46/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 10:29:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gilad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gatineau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google-Analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Live.com / MSN]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineherald.com/2007/08/03/google-analytics-keeps-dissapointing/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While Microsoft is developing the &#8220;next generation of analytics&#8221;, Google&#8217;s competing product keeps letting its users down. The recent outage, which lasted two days straight, was the fourth outage in the month of July alone.
Ever since Google Analytics became free, more and more webmasters have been counting on it as their sole stats provider and like any other free service out there, users start to realize that you always get &#8220;what you pay for&#8221; and in this case it is a very unreliable platform. As noted by Chrissy Icamina, web producer for FHM Philippines, &#8220;It&#8217;s quite inconvenient because my fellow [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/google-analytics-keeps-dissapointing-46/">Google Analytics Keeps Dissapointing</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>While Microsoft is <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/2007/07/24/microsoft-to-launch-a-new-analytics-tool/">developing</a> the &#8220;next generation of analytics&#8221;, Google&#8217;s competing product keeps letting its users down.</strong> The <a href="http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&#038;taxonomyId=154&#038;articleId=9028684&#038;intsrc=hm_topic">recent outage</a>, which lasted two days straight, was the fourth outage in the month of July alone.</p>
<p>Ever since Google Analytics became free, more and more webmasters have been counting on it as their sole stats provider and like any other free service out there, users start to realize that you always get &#8220;what you pay for&#8221; and in this case it is a very unreliable platform. As noted by Chrissy Icamina, web producer for <em>FHM Philippines</em>, &#8220;It&#8217;s quite inconvenient because my fellow producers and I file weekly reports of our statistics, and inaccurate statistics render our reports useless.&#8221; </p>
<p>I find it hard to believe that a world renown magazine relies on this platform for such reports, and am personally using two different ones (Google Analytics and a paid service) for my analytics, but these problems play directly to the hands of Microsoft and their new <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/2007/07/24/microsoft-to-launch-a-new-analytics-tool/">Gatineau</a> platform.</p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/google-analytics-keeps-dissapointing-46/">Google Analytics Keeps Dissapointing</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/google-analytics-keeps-dissapointing-46/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>