<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>EveryJoe &#187; navigation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.everyjoe.com/tag/navigation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.everyjoe.com</link>
	<description>Sports News - Tech Reviews - Entertainment - Life Tips for EveryJoe</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 21:38:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Use Less Space on Tree View Navigation</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/use-less-space-on-tree-view-navigation-59/</link>
		<comments>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/use-less-space-on-tree-view-navigation-59/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 16:12:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Bean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GUI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[navigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tree view]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[white space]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.microsoftweblog.com/use-less-space-on-tree-view-navigation/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ 
One of the most common navigation structures in software is the tree view directory.
It&#8217;s logical, it makes sense, it&#8217;s easy to quickly find what you&#8217;re looking for and it&#8217;s immediately recognizable for just about any computer easy old or new.
My only gripe is that it takes up so much room when you&#8217;re two or three levels into the navigation.
As you can see from my screen grab from Microsoft SQL Server Management Studio 2005, there&#8217;s a lot of wasted space on the left of the tree.
At the bottom of this post I&#8217;ve added another picture where I&#8217;ve sliced out some [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/use-less-space-on-tree-view-navigation-59/">Use Less Space on Tree View Navigation</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/files/59/2008/11/sqlenterprisemgrobjectexplorer.gif"><img title="SQL-Enterprise-Mgr-Object-Explorer" style="border-top-width: 0px; display: inline; border-left-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; margin: 0px 10px 10px 0px; border-right-width: 0px" height="370" alt="SQL-Enterprise-Mgr-Object-Explorer" src="http://www.everyjoe.com/files/59/2008/11/sqlenterprisemgrobjectexplorer-thumb.gif" width="185" align="left" border="0" /></a> </p>
<p>One of the most common navigation structures in software is the tree view directory.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s logical, it makes sense, it&#8217;s easy to quickly find what you&#8217;re looking for and it&#8217;s immediately recognizable for just about any computer easy old or new.</p>
<p>My only gripe is that it takes up so much room when you&#8217;re two or three levels into the navigation.</p>
<p>As you can see from my screen grab from Microsoft SQL Server Management Studio 2005, there&#8217;s a lot of wasted space on the left of the tree.</p>
<p>At the bottom of this post I&#8217;ve added another picture where I&#8217;ve sliced out some of the extra white-space that&#8217;s to the left of the tree sections.</p>
<p>Granted in that image it&#8217;s not precise and probably needs a little more white space between, but I&#8217;ve saved quite a bit of space.</p>
<p>Then again, the other solution for me may be to just get a larger, widescreen monitor when I&#8217;m working. However, when you&#8217;re using a laptop remotely you don&#8217;t have many other options.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/files/59/2008/11/sqlenterprisemgrobjectexplorercondensed.gif"><img title="SQL-Enterprise-Mgr-Object-Explorer-condensed" style="border-right: 0px; border-top: 0px; display: inline; border-left: 0px; border-bottom: 0px" height="507" alt="SQL-Enterprise-Mgr-Object-Explorer-condensed" src="http://www.everyjoe.com/files/59/2008/11/sqlenterprisemgrobjectexplorercondensed-thumb.gif" width="262" border="0" /></a> </p>
<h6>Images: Screen grabs from SQL Server Management Studio 2005</h6>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/use-less-space-on-tree-view-navigation-59/">Use Less Space on Tree View Navigation</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/use-less-space-on-tree-view-navigation-59/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reader Poll: Should There be a Classic View Option in Office 2007</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/reader-poll-should-there-be-a-classic-view-option-in-office-2007-59/</link>
		<comments>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/reader-poll-should-there-be-a-classic-view-option-in-office-2007-59/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 00:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Bean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[classic view]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft Reader Poll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft User Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[navigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ribbon navigation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.microsoftweblog.com/reader-poll-should-there-be-a-classic-view-option-in-office-2007/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The post stems from my previous post discussing the value of whether or not Microsoft should have developed a &#34;Classic View&#34; navigation option in Office 2007.
Let us know what you think in our current reader poll.
You can add a different choice if one of the ones displayed don&#8217;t quite fit your opinion of the situation.

{democracy:24}

Post from: EveryJoe
Reader Poll: Should There be a Classic View Option in Office 2007
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/reader-poll-should-there-be-a-classic-view-option-in-office-2007-59/">Reader Poll: Should There be a Classic View Option in Office 2007</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The post stems from my previous post discussing the value of whether or not Microsoft should have developed a &quot;Classic View&quot; navigation option in Office 2007.</p>
<p>Let us know what you think in our current reader poll.</p>
<p>You can add a different choice if one of the ones displayed don&#8217;t quite fit your opinion of the situation.</p>
<div>
<div>{democracy:24}</div>
</div>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/reader-poll-should-there-be-a-classic-view-option-in-office-2007-59/">Reader Poll: Should There be a Classic View Option in Office 2007</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/reader-poll-should-there-be-a-classic-view-option-in-office-2007-59/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>