<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>EveryJoe &#187; patent infringement</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.everyjoe.com/tag/patent-infringement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.everyjoe.com</link>
	<description>Sports News - Tech Reviews - Entertainment - Life Tips for EveryJoe</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 07:45:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Dish Network to Pay TiVo $200M</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/dish-network-to-pay-tivo-200m/</link>
		<comments>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/dish-network-to-pay-tivo-200m/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 02:26:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Ellis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sanctions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bizzia.com/?p=37997</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[TiVo has long suffered from competitors using the television pause and rewind technology for which TiVo became famous. Now, though, the struggling DVR maker has managed to convince a federal judge that Dish Network and its sister firm, EchoStar, have violated an injunction against copying the technology, forcing the latter two companies to pay a total of $200 million to TiVo.
While Dish Network plans to appeal the case, it will be forced to pay the $110 million in damages, $90 million in sanctions, and additional attorney fees, as well as additional sanctions if it loses its appeal. This ruling comes [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/dish-network-to-pay-tivo-200m/">Dish Network to Pay TiVo $200M</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TiVo has long suffered from competitors using the television pause and rewind technology for which TiVo became famous. Now, though, the struggling DVR maker has managed to convince a federal judge that Dish Network and its sister firm, EchoStar, have violated an injunction against copying the technology, forcing the latter two companies to pay a total of $200 million to TiVo.</p>
<p>While Dish Network plans to appeal the case, it will be forced to pay the $110 million in damages, $90 million in sanctions, and additional attorney fees, as well as additional sanctions if it loses its appeal. This ruling comes after Dish Network’s 2004 loss to TiVo in a patent infringement case, a ruling that prompted Dish Network to begin selling modified software to its customers.</p>
<p>Even though it won the case, TiVo had been hoping for $1 billion in settlements for Dish Network’s use of the technology from April 2008 to July 2009. According to Dish Network, the violation of the injunction had been done in good faith, and that Dish Network never meant to cause any harm to TiVo. The company remains confident about its chances at appellate court.</p>
<div id="attachment_37998" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 299px"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/roadsidepictures/3673093545/"><img class="size-medium wp-image-37998" src="http://www.bizzia.com/files/2009/09/dish-network-289x300.jpg" alt="Image: Flickr" width="289" height="300" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Image: Flickr</p></div>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/dish-network-to-pay-tivo-200m/">Dish Network to Pay TiVo $200M</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/dish-network-to-pay-tivo-200m/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IBM Sued Over Patent Infringements</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/ibm-sued-over-patent-infringements/</link>
		<comments>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/ibm-sued-over-patent-infringements/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 00:47:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Ellis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASIC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DRAM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Lindgren]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microprocessor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MOSAID]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent infringement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bizzia.com/?p=32491</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Canadian company MOSAID Technologies has filed a lawsuit against International Business Machines Corp., otherwise known as IBM, for six alleged patent infringements. According to MOSAID, it has tried for years to reach some sort of settlement with IBM but has been unable to agree with the technology giant in negotiations.
 
The lawsuit focuses on IBM’s producing and selling certain products that use technology patented by MOSAID without ever having acquired a license to their patents. The technology involves microprocessors and Application-Specific Integrated Circuits that IBM would otherwise certainly be able to use if it had pursued a license.
 
MOSAID President and CEO [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/ibm-sued-over-patent-infringements/">IBM Sued Over Patent Infringements</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Canadian company MOSAID Technologies has filed a lawsuit against International Business Machines Corp., otherwise known as IBM, for six alleged patent infringements. According to MOSAID, it has tried for years to reach some sort of settlement with IBM but has been unable to agree with the technology giant in negotiations.<br />
 <br />
The lawsuit focuses on IBM’s producing and selling certain products that use technology patented by MOSAID without ever having acquired a license to their patents. The technology involves microprocessors and Application-Specific Integrated Circuits that IBM would otherwise certainly be able to use if it had pursued a license.<br />
 <br />
MOSAID President and CEO John Lindgren maintains that his company deals with almost all of the Dynamic Random Access Memory commodities in the world, which means that IBM would have had to correspond with MOSAID at some point. IBM has not yet released any comment on the matter, but MOSAID and Howrey LLP, a specialized U.S. law firm, will go forward with the lawsuit.</p>
<div id="attachment_32492" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/kansirnet/139521507/"><img class="size-medium wp-image-32492" src="http://www.bizzia.com/files/2009/07/ibm-300x225.jpg" alt="Image: Flickr" width="300" height="225" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Image: Flickr</p></div>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/ibm-sued-over-patent-infringements/">IBM Sued Over Patent Infringements</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/ibm-sued-over-patent-infringements/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>RJ Reynolds Victorious in Patent Case</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/rj-reynolds-victorious-in-patent-case/</link>
		<comments>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/rj-reynolds-victorious-in-patent-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 02:22:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Ellis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[R.J. Reynolds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Star Scientific]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tobacco]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bizzia.com/?p=29500</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Expect sour grapes from Star Scientific Inc. in the coming days, as the tobacco company just emerged as the loser in a huge lawsuit against R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. Although Star Scientific Claimed that R.J. Reynolds infringed on its patents, a Baltimore jury found that R.J. Reynolds had done no such thing.
This means that R.J. Reynolds will not be have to pay the hundreds of millions of dollars that Star Scientific sought in damages for the perceived infringement of R.J. Reynolds upon a new tobacco curing method that removes more cancer-causing chemicals. It also means that Star Scientific will also [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/rj-reynolds-victorious-in-patent-case/">RJ Reynolds Victorious in Patent Case</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Expect sour grapes from Star Scientific Inc. in the coming days, as the tobacco company just emerged as the loser in a huge lawsuit against R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. Although Star Scientific Claimed that R.J. Reynolds infringed on its patents, a Baltimore jury found that R.J. Reynolds had done no such thing.</p>
<div id="attachment_29502" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/ellievanhoutte/2826033073/"><img class="size-medium wp-image-29502" src="http://www.bizzia.com/files/2009/06/tobacco-300x196.jpg" alt="Image: Flickr" width="300" height="196" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Image: Flickr</p></div>
<p>This means that R.J. Reynolds will not be have to pay the hundreds of millions of dollars that Star Scientific sought in damages for the perceived infringement of R.J. Reynolds upon a new tobacco curing method that removes more cancer-causing chemicals. It also means that Star Scientific will also have to head into recovery mode, as the verdict caused its stocks to tumble 80 percent.<br />
 <br />
According to RJR at trial, the tobacco giant invented its own method of accomplishing the same exact thing as Star and that it did not need to copy the plans. RJR also questioned Star’s attitude throughout the trial, deriding its tendency to play the victim and the benefactor.</p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/rj-reynolds-victorious-in-patent-case/">RJ Reynolds Victorious in Patent Case</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/rj-reynolds-victorious-in-patent-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
