<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>EveryJoe &#187; Rumors &amp; Gossip</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.everyjoe.com/tag/rumors-gossip/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.everyjoe.com</link>
	<description>Sports News - Tech Reviews - Entertainment - Life Tips for EveryJoe</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 15:45:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>A YouTube Bug Outs its Users&#8217; FTP</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/a-youtube-bug-outs-its-users-ftp-46/</link>
		<comments>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/a-youtube-bug-outs-its-users-ftp-46/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 13:31:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gilad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hacking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rumors & Gossip]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineherald.com/2007/06/22/a-youtube-bug-outs-its-users-ftp/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google have had this problem for a few days now and never found the time to fix it. Apparently, when you search for site:youtube.com “clicks from ftp @”, you can see all the ftp details for many YouTube users.
PS. As I mentioned, this has been out for right about a week now, so it is not an indexing thing but just Google who is probably busy with hybrid vehicles.
[via DAVEN] 
Post from: EveryJoe
A YouTube Bug Outs its Users&#8217; FTP
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/a-youtube-bug-outs-its-users-ftp-46/">A YouTube Bug Outs its Users&#8217; FTP</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Google have had this problem for a few days now and never found the time to fix it.</strong> Apparently, when you search for <a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Ayoutube.com+%22clicks+from+ftp+%40%22"><em><code>site:youtube.com “clicks from ftp @”</code></em></a>, you can see all the ftp details for many YouTube users.</p>
<p>PS. As I mentioned, this has been out for right about a week now, so it is not an indexing thing but just Google who is probably busy with <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/2007/06/21/google-is-exploring-the-hybrid-vehicle-market/">hybrid vehicles</a>.</p>
<p><small>[via <a href="http://www.davidnaylor.co.uk/archives/2007/06/21/youtube-give-users-ftp-details-away/">DAVEN</a>]</small> </p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/a-youtube-bug-outs-its-users-ftp-46/">A YouTube Bug Outs its Users&#8217; FTP</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/a-youtube-bug-outs-its-users-ftp-46/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>3 High Profile Engineers Leave Google</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/3-high-profile-engineers-leave-google-46/</link>
		<comments>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/3-high-profile-engineers-leave-google-46/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 16:34:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gilad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google-Rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rumors & Gossip]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineherald.com/2007/06/21/3-high-profile-engineers-leave-google/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When Vanessa Fox, lead developer at Google Webmaster Central, left Google last week to work at Zillow, I considered it a minor event and didn&#8217;t even report, but the report this morning at SEL of Two Top Google Engineers Leave Google really makes one ask whether we are watching a developing trend or just a coincidence?
The two developers, Bret Taylor and Jim Norris, were largely responsible for the development of Google Maps as well as other Google products. Both have left Google to work at Benchmark Capital, a venture capital firm.
Is streamline-ness taking away from its innovative-ness? Is free enterprise [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/3-high-profile-engineers-leave-google-46/">3 High Profile Engineers Leave Google</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>When Vanessa Fox, lead developer at <a href="http://www.google.com/webmasters/">Google Webmaster Central</a>, left Google last week to work at <a href="http://www.zillow.com/">Zillow</a>, I considered it a minor event and didn&#8217;t even report, but the report this morning at SEL of <a href="http://searchengineland.com/070621-082235.php">Two Top Google Engineers Leave Google</a> really makes one ask whether we are watching a developing trend or just a coincidence?</strong></p>
<p>The two developers, Bret Taylor and Jim Norris, were largely responsible for the development of Google Maps as well as other Google products. Both have left Google to work at Benchmark Capital, a venture capital firm.</p>
<p>Is streamline-ness taking away from its innovative-ness? Is free enterprise starting to take over the &#8220;Google dream&#8221;?</p>
<p><small>[via <a href="http://searchengineland.com/070621-082235.php">SEARCHENGINELAND</a>]</small></p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/3-high-profile-engineers-leave-google-46/">3 High Profile Engineers Leave Google</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/3-high-profile-engineers-leave-google-46/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rumors of a Myspace Acquisition by Yahoo</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/rumors-of-a-myspace-acquisition-by-yahoo-46/</link>
		<comments>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/rumors-of-a-myspace-acquisition-by-yahoo-46/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 16:17:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gilad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Acquisitions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MySpace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rumors & Gossip]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineherald.com/2007/06/21/rumors-of-a-myspace-acquisition-by-yahoo/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The biggest headline yesterday was from the British TIMESONLINE who announced that News Corp explores swap of MySpace site for Yahoo! stake. According to the article, News Corp who owns Myspace, will be willing to give Myspace away in return for a 30 per cent stake in Yahoo. This means a return of $12.3 billion for their $580 million investment only 2 years ago.
Myspace is currently working exclusively with Google for powering its search feature as well as ad platform and a Yahoo takeover may mean a big blow for Google, considering Myspace is the one of the most visited [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/rumors-of-a-myspace-acquisition-by-yahoo-46/">Rumors of a Myspace Acquisition by Yahoo</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The biggest headline yesterday was from the British TIMESONLINE who announced that <a href="http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/industry_sectors/media/article1957867.ece">News Corp explores swap of MySpace site for Yahoo! stake</a></strong>. According to the article, News Corp who owns Myspace, will be willing to give Myspace away in return for a 30 per cent stake in Yahoo. This means a return of $12.3 billion for their $580 million investment only 2 years ago.</p>
<p>Myspace is currently working exclusively with Google for powering its search feature as well as ad platform and a Yahoo takeover may mean a big blow for Google, considering Myspace is the one of the most visited sites on the net.</p>
<p>I must mention that these talks may fail after all given the resignation of Yahoo&#8217;s CEO, Terry Semel, only two days ago and the takeover by Yahoo&#8217;s co-founder, Jerry Yang.</p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/rumors-of-a-myspace-acquisition-by-yahoo-46/">Rumors of a Myspace Acquisition by Yahoo</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/rumors-of-a-myspace-acquisition-by-yahoo-46/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft&#8217;s Secret “Rock Star” Engine</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/microsofts-secret-%e2%80%9crock-star%e2%80%9d-engine-46/</link>
		<comments>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/microsofts-secret-%e2%80%9crock-star%e2%80%9d-engine-46/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 03:15:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gilad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Live.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Live.com / MSN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New-Engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rumors & Gossip]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineherald.com/2007/06/05/microsofts-secret-%e2%80%9crock-star%e2%80%9d-engine/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Did Microsoft decide to drop their current search technology and start from scratch? A recent report from TechCrunch mentions that Microsoft has gathered a team of twenty or more “rock star” developers who’ve been tasked at building their next generation search engine.
According to their source, this is a new &#8220;very cool&#8221;, &#8220;horizontal&#8221; engine which will be able to cover many &#8220;verticals&#8221; all at once.
Microsoft&#8217;s search technology has been falling behind the rest since the beginning and even the launch of Live.com did not prove any significant change. However, I keep on wondering if Microsoft can ever have that &#8220;stickiness&#8221; and [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/microsofts-secret-%e2%80%9crock-star%e2%80%9d-engine-46/">Microsoft&#8217;s Secret “Rock Star” Engine</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Did Microsoft decide to drop their current search technology and start from scratch?</strong> A recent report from <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/03/microsoft-silicon-valley-team-building-stealth-search-engine/">TechCrunch</a> mentions that <em>Microsoft has gathered a team of twenty or more “rock star” developers who’ve been tasked at building their next generation search engine</em>.</p>
<p>According to their source, this is a new &#8220;very cool&#8221;, &#8220;horizontal&#8221; engine which will be able to cover many &#8220;verticals&#8221; all at once.</p>
<p>Microsoft&#8217;s search technology has been falling behind the rest since the beginning and even the launch of Live.com did not prove any significant change. However, I keep on wondering if Microsoft can ever have that &#8220;stickiness&#8221; and &#8220;coolness&#8221; that drives the Google traffic?</p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/microsofts-secret-%e2%80%9crock-star%e2%80%9d-engine-46/">Microsoft&#8217;s Secret “Rock Star” Engine</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/microsofts-secret-%e2%80%9crock-star%e2%80%9d-engine-46/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google to Acquire Feedburner?</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/google-to-acquire-feedburner-46/</link>
		<comments>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/google-to-acquire-feedburner-46/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 17:26:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gilad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rumors & Gossip]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineherald.com/2007/05/18/google-to-acquire-feedburner/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Via Vecosys&#8216; &#8220;VERY trusted source&#8221; comes the rumor of the day &#8211; Google is set to acquire Feedburner!
According to the source the delay in announcement is solely due to the delay in closing the DoubleClick deal and should be out soon thereafter.
The rise in popularity of RSS feeds caused Adsense and DoubleClick a big hit since their ads are no longer displayed (in most cases) and such a deal would make sense since it will give Google an opportunity to place their ads across all these feeds.
Post from: EveryJoe
Google to Acquire Feedburner?
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/google-to-acquire-feedburner-46/">Google to Acquire Feedburner?</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.feedburner.com/fb/i/flamocon_190h.gif" align="left" /><strong>Via <a href="http://www.vecosys.com/2007/05/18/rumour-google-to-buy-feedburner/">Vecosys</a>&#8216; &#8220;VERY trusted source&#8221; comes the rumor of the day &#8211; Google is set to acquire Feedburner!</strong><br />
According to the source the delay in announcement is solely due to the delay in closing the DoubleClick deal and should be out soon thereafter.</p>
<p>The rise in popularity of RSS feeds caused Adsense and DoubleClick a big hit since their ads are no longer displayed (in most cases) and such a deal would make sense since it will give Google an opportunity to place their ads across all these feeds.</p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/google-to-acquire-feedburner-46/">Google to Acquire Feedburner?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/google-to-acquire-feedburner-46/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Searching, For a Snake&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/google-searching-for-a-snake-46/</link>
		<comments>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/google-searching-for-a-snake-46/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 13:44:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gilad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rumors & Gossip]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineherald.com/2007/04/03/google-searching-for-a-snake/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The recent search news from Google do not involve new tools or services from the company, not even a complaint about the company&#8217;s offerings. It is a search for a 3-foot python snake who has suspected to have invaded the company&#8217;s New York offices&#8230;
&#8220;What you have heard is in fact true and not an April Fools&#8217; Day joke,&#8221; said Google&#8217;s spokesman, &#8220;We are confident that we have the appropriate resources in place to resolve this issue as quickly as possible in the best interests of both the Googlers in our NYC office and Kaiser the snake.&#8220;
Post from: EveryJoe
Google Searching, For [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/google-searching-for-a-snake-46/">Google Searching, For a Snake&#8230;</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src='http://www.everyjoe.com/files/46/2007/04/python.png' alt='python.png' align="right" /><strong>The <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2007/04/03/news/funny/google_snake/index.htm?section=money_latest">recent</a> search news from Google do not involve new tools or services from the company, not even a complaint about the company&#8217;s offerings.</strong> It is a search for a 3-foot python snake who has suspected to have invaded the company&#8217;s New York offices&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;<em>What you have heard is in fact true and not an April Fools&#8217; Day joke,</em>&#8221; said Google&#8217;s spokesman, &#8220;<em>We are confident that we have the appropriate resources in place to resolve this issue as quickly as possible in the best interests of both the Googlers in our NYC office and Kaiser the snake.</em>&#8220;</p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/google-searching-for-a-snake-46/">Google Searching, For a Snake&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/google-searching-for-a-snake-46/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Acquisition Rumors for Google &amp; Yahoo</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/acquisition-rumors-for-google-yahoo-46/</link>
		<comments>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/acquisition-rumors-for-google-yahoo-46/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 04:25:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gilad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rumors & Gossip]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineherald.com/2007/03/12/acquisition-rumors-for-google-yahoo/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two big search-related acquisition rumors were spread today, the one related to Yahoo being acquired by AT&#038;T and the second about Google acquiring Dish Network.
MSNBC was the first to post Yahoo feels the pressure of AT&#038;T alliance in which they write:
AT&#038;T was trying to renegotiate a five-year-old agreement under which the US telecoms giant has sold its broadband DSL service under the joint AT&#038;T Yahoo brand name.
Then it was VentureBeat which posted Rumor: Google about to sign ad deal with Dish Networks: 
Google is about to sign a deal with Dish Network, the nation’s second largest satellite TV company, to [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/acquisition-rumors-for-google-yahoo-46/">Acquisition Rumors for Google &#038; Yahoo</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two big search-related acquisition rumors were spread today, the one related to Yahoo being acquired by AT&#038;T and the second about Google acquiring Dish Network.</p>
<p>MSNBC was the first to post <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17538030">Yahoo feels the pressure of AT&#038;T alliance</a> in which they write:</p>
<blockquote><p>AT&#038;T was trying to renegotiate a five-year-old agreement under which the US telecoms giant has sold its broadband DSL service under the joint AT&#038;T Yahoo brand name.</p></blockquote>
<p>Then it was VentureBeat which posted Rumor: <a href="http://venturebeat.com/2007/03/11/rumor-google-about-to-sign-ad-deal-with-dish-networks/">Google about to sign ad deal with Dish Networks</a>: </p>
<blockquote><p>Google is about to sign a deal with Dish Network, the nation’s second largest satellite TV company, to deliver ads for Dish’s network</p></blockquote>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/acquisition-rumors-for-google-yahoo-46/">Acquisition Rumors for Google &#038; Yahoo</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/acquisition-rumors-for-google-yahoo-46/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Loses the GMail Name in Europe</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/google-loses-the-gmail-name-in-europe-46/</link>
		<comments>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/google-loses-the-gmail-name-in-europe-46/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 20:59:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gilad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rumors & Gossip]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineherald.com/2007/02/01/google-loses-the-gmail-name-in-europe/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A little over a year ago, Google lost a battle for using it&#8217;s GMail name in the UK, and now it lost it&#8217;s right over the name in all of Europe.
The Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (OHIM), the body which is responsible for European community trademarks, rejected Google&#8217;s appeal after a stiff battle with German-born venture capitalist Daniel Giersch.
In it&#8217;s defence, Google claimed that the names are not confusingly similar as Giersch, who owned the trademark for over 6 years, uses it for a competition service to the Deutsche Post. They even offered him $250,000 to settle for [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/google-loses-the-gmail-name-in-europe-46/">Google Loses the GMail Name in Europe</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>A little over a year ago, Google lost a battle for using it&#8217;s <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/2005/10/18/gmail-goes-google-mail-in-the-uk/">GMail name in the UK</a>, and now <a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/01/31/google_looses_trademark_battle/">it lost it&#8217;s right over the name in all of Europe</a>.</strong></p>
<blockquote><p>The Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (OHIM), the body which is responsible for European community trademarks, rejected Google&#8217;s appeal after a stiff battle with German-born venture capitalist Daniel Giersch.</p></blockquote>
<p>In it&#8217;s defence, Google claimed that the names are not confusingly similar as Giersch, who owned the trademark for over 6 years, uses it for a competition service to the Deutsche Post. They even offered him $250,000 to settle for the name, but he refused and called Google&#8217;s behaviour &#8220;very threatening, very aggressive and very unfaithful.&#8221;</p>
<p>So from now on, all European users will not see any reference to <strong>Gmail</strong> but only <strong>GoogleMail</strong>.</p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/google-loses-the-gmail-name-in-europe-46/">Google Loses the GMail Name in Europe</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/google-loses-the-gmail-name-in-europe-46/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The GoogleTV Prank</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/the-googletv-prank-46/</link>
		<comments>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/the-googletv-prank-46/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 14:45:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gilad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rumors & Gossip]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineherald.com/2007/01/30/the-googletv-prank/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Over the past weekend, two videos which were uploaded to YouTube caused a mad wave of rumors about an upcoming GoogleTV channel. The videos, titled How to Sign Up for GoogleTV Beta and UPDATE: GoogleTV Beta, are now considered to be a hoax as DNS mis-matches and other issues are claimed to be the proof for it for the video&#8217;s authenticity. 
[via: story&#124;image]
Post from: EveryJoe
The GoogleTV Prank
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/the-googletv-prank-46/">The GoogleTV Prank</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><center><img id="image746" src="http://www.everyjoe.com/files/46/2007/01/google-tv.jpg" alt="google-tv.jpg" /></center></p>
<p><strong>Over the past weekend, two videos which were uploaded to YouTube caused a mad wave of rumors about an upcoming GoogleTV channel.</strong> The videos, titled <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J9SK_M_nVWA">How to Sign Up for GoogleTV Beta</a> and <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7MulSMSJV-U">UPDATE: GoogleTV Beta</a>, are now considered to be a hoax as DNS mis-matches and other issues are claimed to be the proof for it for the video&#8217;s authenticity. </p>
<p>[via: <a href="http://searchengineland.com/070129-093304.php">story</a>|<a href="http://www.hectormilla.com">image</a>]</p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/the-googletv-prank-46/">The GoogleTV Prank</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/the-googletv-prank-46/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When Google&#8217;s Employees Become SEO</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/when-googles-employees-become-seo-46/</link>
		<comments>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/when-googles-employees-become-seo-46/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 18:56:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gilad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rumors & Gossip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Optimization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineherald.com/2007/01/27/when-googles-employees-become-seo/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For a long time now, many SEO&#8217;s have been playing with the question &#8220;what would happen if Matt Cutts quit Google and joined an SEO firm?&#8221; After all, Matt leads Google quality team which is mainly in charge of fighting spam and exploits.
While that hasn&#8217;t happened (yet), NMA reports this week that four guys off Matt&#8217;s Ireland crew quit their Google job and went solo to start their own SEO firm&#8230;
I am not sure what are the consequences of such a move and it seems as if Google may like to bound such employees by contract from making such moves, [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/when-googles-employees-become-seo-46/">When Google&#8217;s Employees Become SEO</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>For a long time now, many SEO&#8217;s have been playing with the question &#8220;what would happen if Matt Cutts quit Google and joined an SEO firm?&#8221; After all, Matt leads Google quality team which is mainly in charge of fighting spam and exploits.</strong></p>
<p>While that hasn&#8217;t happened (yet), <a href="http://www.nma.co.uk/">NMA</a> reports this week that four guys off Matt&#8217;s Ireland crew quit their Google job and went solo to start their own SEO firm&#8230;</p>
<p>I am not sure what are the consequences of such a move and it seems as if Google may like to bound such employees by contract from making such moves, but it is sure as hell a very juicy move.</p>
<p><font size="1">[via <a href="http://www.threadwatch.org/node/11548">ThreadWatch</a>]</font></p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/when-googles-employees-become-seo-46/">When Google&#8217;s Employees Become SEO</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/when-googles-employees-become-seo-46/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>