<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>EveryJoe &#187; TechCrunch</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.everyjoe.com/tag/techcrunch/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.everyjoe.com</link>
	<description>Sports News - Tech Reviews - Entertainment - Life Tips for EveryJoe</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 06:42:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>CrunchPad is D.O.A.</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/crunchpad-is-d-o-a/</link>
		<comments>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/crunchpad-is-d-o-a/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 17:38:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robin Parrish</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Electronics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crunchpad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TechCrunch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.everyjoe.com/?p=145621</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[TechCrunch has been working for more than a year on a simple but large, touchscreen device that could be used to &#8220;surf the Internet from your couch,&#8221; intended to be sold for a $300-or-less pricetag. Today, TC reports that all of their long efforts have gone up in smoke, due to a bizarre series of events that ultimately boil down to one thing: greed.

The CrunchPad was an ambitious, brilliantly obvious idea. Who wouldn&#8217;t want to have an easy-to-use, open source touchscreen pad with wireless connectivity and ease of use? Surf the net, watch video, play games, etc. The CrunchPad was [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/crunchpad-is-d-o-a/">CrunchPad is D.O.A.</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TechCrunch has been working for more than a year on a simple but large, touchscreen device that could be used to &#8220;surf the Internet from your couch,&#8221; intended to be sold for a $300-or-less pricetag. Today, <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/11/30/crunchpad-end/" target="_blank">TC reports</a> that all of their long efforts have gone up in smoke, due to a bizarre series of events that ultimately boil down to one thing: greed.</p>
<p style="text-align: center"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-72696" src="http://images1.everyjoe.com/files/2009/06/crunchpad.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="292" /></p>
<p>The <strong>CrunchPad</strong> was an ambitious, brilliantly obvious idea. Who wouldn&#8217;t want to have an easy-to-use, open source touchscreen pad with wireless connectivity and ease of use? Surf the net, watch video, play games, etc. The CrunchPad was poised to be a major competitor against Apple&#8217;s impending iPad device. But the dream has ended.</p>
<p>According to the story posted on TechCrunch, the CrunchPad was being designed by a small startup called Fusion Garage, which apparently turned on TC due to pressure from its shareholders. Fusion Garage basically attempted to shut TechCrunch out of the project that TC first conceived of, abruptly informing them that Fusion Garage would be releasing the product themselves. This, despite the fact that TC jointly owns the &#8220;CrunchPad&#8221; intellectual property along with Fusion Garage, and TC owns CrunchPad trademark alone.</p>
<p>It looks like the folks at TechCrunch are still scratching their heads in confusion over this attempted theft of intellectual property. The whole business is sure to be mired in lawsuits for a long time as the legal system sorts the mess out. There&#8217;s a lot more to this sordid tale &#8212; <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/11/30/crunchpad-end/" target="_blank">click here</a> if you want to read it.</p>
<p><em>Image: TechCrunch.</em></p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/crunchpad-is-d-o-a/">CrunchPad is D.O.A.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/crunchpad-is-d-o-a/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Have you seen the CrunchPad?</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/have-you-seen-the-crunchpad/</link>
		<comments>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/have-you-seen-the-crunchpad/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 02:15:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robin Parrish</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Electronics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crunchpad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TechCrunch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.everyjoe.com/?p=72690</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now this is just plain cool.
Tired of waiting for Apple or Dell or Sony to put out a killer-app tablet that won&#8217;t break the bank, tech site TechCrunch.com took the initiative to make it happen on their own. The result is the CrunchPad, and despite all odds, it actually seems to be happening.

TechCrunch&#8217;s idea is simple: create a very thin, light touch screen device that has no hard drive and exists solely to surf the web. Upon investigating, TC&#8217;s Michael Arrington discovered that such a gadget could be constructed for less than $250, and sold for less than $300.
They&#8217;ve been [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/have-you-seen-the-crunchpad/">Have you seen the CrunchPad?</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now this is just plain cool.</p>
<p>Tired of waiting for Apple or Dell or Sony to put out a killer-app tablet that won&#8217;t break the bank, tech site <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/" target="_blank">TechCrunch.com</a> took the initiative to make it happen on their own. The result is the <strong>CrunchPad</strong>, and despite all odds, it actually seems to be happening.</p>
<p style="text-align: center"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-72696" src="http://www.everyjoe.com/files/2009/06/crunchpad.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="292" /></p>
<p><a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/03/crunchpad-the-launch-prototype/" target="_blank">TechCrunch&#8217;s idea</a> is simple: create a very thin, light touch screen device that has no hard drive and exists solely to surf the web. Upon investigating, TC&#8217;s Michael Arrington discovered that such a gadget could be constructed for less than $250, and sold for less than $300.</p>
<p>They&#8217;ve been prototyping the thing for more than a year, and it&#8217;s getting closer and closer to actual production. The customer for this thing is envisioned as someone who wants to surf the web, read email, watch online videos, and video chat. It&#8217;s a bare-bones device not intended for data entry, with just one USB port, a built-in camera, speakers, microphone, and a 12+ inch screen. The OS they&#8217;re using is Linux-based, with a Webkit-based browser.</p>
<p>The prototype is darn purdy and looks like something I&#8217;d love to have. And at less than $300, it&#8217;s seems like the perfect device for anyone who wants to surf the web on the couch for pleasure, without the need for a leg-burning full laptop. I can&#8217;t wait to see more of the <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/03/crunchpad-the-launch-prototype/" target="_blank">CrunchPad</a>! Here&#8217;s hoping it actually goes into production.</p>
<p><em>Image: Copyright 2009 ©TechCrunch.</em></p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/have-you-seen-the-crunchpad/">Have you seen the CrunchPad?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/have-you-seen-the-crunchpad/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oops&#8230;Photosynth. You like it! You really like it!</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/oopsphotosynth-you-like-it-you-really-like-it-59/</link>
		<comments>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/oopsphotosynth-you-like-it-you-really-like-it-59/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 03:16:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Bean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jason Kincaid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Live Labs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft Product Sites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photosynth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[server issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TechCrunch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.microsoftweblog.com/oopsphotosynth-you-like-it-you-really-like-it/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
 
Was it a case of bad planning, low expectations or just a complete oversight? Did anyone think about how popular Microsoft’s Photosynth application from Microsoft Live Labs was actually going to be?
When I talked about Photosynth back in May I barely gave it any thought at all.
Perhaps the most famous of them is the Photosynth application. This takes a collection of images from the same place and stitches them together into a sort of 3D virtual image of the location.

I thought the technology itself sounded like it would be interesting, but I didn’t really think it would gain much [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/oopsphotosynth-you-like-it-you-really-like-it-59/">Oops&hellip;Photosynth. You like it! You really like it!</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[</p>
<p><img title="photosynth" height="203" alt="photosynth" src="http://www.everyjoe.com/files/59/2008/08/photosynth.gif" width="493" border="0" /> </p>
<p>Was it a case of bad planning, low expectations or just a complete oversight? Did anyone think about how popular <a title="Microsoft’s Photosynth application" href="http://photosynth.net/Default.aspx" target="_blank">Microsoft’s <strong>Photosynth</strong> application</a> from <a title="Microsoft Live Labs" href="http://livelabs.com/" target="_blank"><strong>Microsoft Live Labs</strong></a> was actually going to be?</p>
<p>When <a title="More From Microsoft Live Labs" href="http://www.everyjoe.com/more-from-microsoft-live-labs/" target="_blank">I talked about Photosynth back in May</a> I barely gave it any thought at all.</p>
<blockquote><p>Perhaps the most famous of them is the <a href="http://labs.live.com/Photosynth.aspx"><strong>Photosynth</strong></a> application. This takes a collection of images from the same place and stitches them together into a sort of 3D virtual image of the location.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I thought the technology itself sounded like it would be interesting, but I didn’t really think it would gain much traction with users. Which brings us back to the original question, what was the deal with <a title="Microsoft" href="http://www.microsoft.com" target="_blank">Microsoft</a> being prepared for the launch.</p>
<p>The <a title="Photosynth examples" href="http://photosynth.net/Default.aspx" target="_blank"><strong>Photosynth</strong> examples on the website</a> sure make the technology look pretty good. I can imagine this becoming really popular in an organized fashion. I’m thinking of realtors that would use it for virtual house tours and tourist destinations and buildings.</p>
<p><span id="more-9591"></span></p>
<p><a title="Microsoft Celebrates Photosynths Server Failure, Surprised People Like It" href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/08/21/microsoft-celebrates-photosynth-server-failure-surprised-people-like-it/" target="_blank"><strong>Jason Kincaid</strong> covered the failure of Microsoft</a> to be prepared for the popularity of the Photosynth site on <strong>TechCrunch</strong>.</p>
<blockquote><p>We see similar optimistic responses to server failure all the time from startups. Except they’re <i>startups</i>. Imagine if Apple had responded to the iPhone’s server registration outage by proclaiming that it was overjoyed by the overwhelming response. It’s understandable that Microsoft is happy to have made a product people like, but let’s save the celebrations until the program actually works.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>This comment just refreshes my perception that it doesn’t matter what Microsoft does, people are just going to be haters. They over prepare and someone calls them cocky for thinking their product is awesome and might compete in the market. Or, they just throw something out there and see what happens then they get berated for not having everything polished and presentable. They’re this behemoth of a software company and evil and who knows what lurks behind the walls of the corporation. Or, they show some transparency from their development teams on their blogs and again get persecuted for it in the tech community.</p>
<p>I say keep up the good work and continue doing what you’re doing. Be prepared and be ready to respond when something you have takes off. </p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/oopsphotosynth-you-like-it-you-really-like-it-59/">Oops&hellip;Photosynth. You like it! You really like it!</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/oopsphotosynth-you-like-it-you-really-like-it-59/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Impending Total IE Crash: How Do You Recover From This</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/impending-total-ie-crash-how-do-you-recover-from-this-59/</link>
		<comments>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/impending-total-ie-crash-how-do-you-recover-from-this-59/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 03:26:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Bean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blue screen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google-Toolbar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TechCrunch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.microsoftweblog.com/impending-total-ie-crash-how-do-you-recover-from-this/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ 
I was working on a blog post the other day about whether or not the Google Toolbar was a trojan horse for online advertising targeting. I was referencing a post on TechCrunch that talked about it and in their post they had a video of Microsoft&#8217;s Steve Ballmer talking about the issue. 
The video was labeled as being from the Washington Post. When I tried to paste the embed code into my post in Windows Live Writer, Internet Explorer tried to keep opening new IE windows one right after another. 
I have no idea what was happening or why, [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/impending-total-ie-crash-how-do-you-recover-from-this-59/">Impending Total IE Crash: How Do You Recover From This</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/files/59/2008/06/ie-hosed-computer.gif" target="_blank"><img style="margin: 0px" height="547" alt="IE-hosed-computer" src="http://www.everyjoe.com/files/59/2008/06/ie-hosed-computer-thumb.gif" width="500" border="0"/></a> </p>
<p>I was working on a blog post the other day about whether or not the Google Toolbar was a trojan horse for online advertising targeting. I was referencing <a title="Is the Google Toolbar a Trojan Horse for Ad Targeting? (Ballmer Plays The Privacy Card)." href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/16/is-the-google-toolbar-a-trojan-horse-for-ad-targetting-ballmer-plays-the-privacy-card/" target="_blank">a post on TechCrunch</a> that talked about it and in their post they had a video of Microsoft&#8217;s <strong>Steve Ballmer</strong> talking about the issue. </p>
<p>The video was labeled as being from the Washington Post. When I tried to paste the embed code into my post in <strong>Windows Live Writer</strong>, <strong>Internet Explorer</strong> tried to keep opening new IE windows one right after another. </p>
<p>I have no idea what was happening or why, but my question is how do you recover from an impending crash that you know is about to happen? I tried to open Task Manager and start ending the tasks manually but they were starting new ones faster than I could kill the applications. It was the same case for trying to kill the processes as well. I knew it was coming. How do you stop it? I couldn&#8217;t even get to my other open programs to try and save items before it happened.</p>
<p>Anyone with an idea of what occurred let me know so I can try and avoid it in the future. Was it a problem with IE? Was it a problem with Windows Live Writer? Was it a problem with the embedded code itself trying to do something?</p>
<p>If you don&#8217;t know the answers to that but know how to escape from an impending crash quickly please let me know.</p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/impending-total-ie-crash-how-do-you-recover-from-this-59/">Impending Total IE Crash: How Do You Recover From This</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/impending-total-ie-crash-how-do-you-recover-from-this-59/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google and Yahoo Announcing Partnership?</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/google-and-yahoo-announcing-partnership-59/</link>
		<comments>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/google-and-yahoo-announcing-partnership-59/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 17:53:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Bean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TechCrunch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.microsoftweblog.com/google-and-yahoo-announcing-partnership/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What&#8217;s changed? 
TechCrunch is reporting that Google and Yahoo are announcing a search partnership today at 1:30pm.
Update: everything I’m hearing says that the companies will be announcing a search partnership of some sort at 1:30. Since we’re talking about public companies here, I want to stress that this has not been confirmed by either Yahoo or Google at this point.

It wasn&#8217;t long ago that I wrote about Yahoo! managers not wanting a Google partnership. Do they now want one because Microsoft isn&#8217;t interested anymore and they think that&#8217;s all they&#8217;ve got now? 
I just can&#8217;t imagine this not being considered [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/google-and-yahoo-announcing-partnership-59/">Google and Yahoo Announcing Partnership?</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s changed? </p>
<p><a title="TechCrunch" href="http://www.techcrunch.com" target="_blank">TechCrunch</a> is reporting that Google and Yahoo are announcing a search partnership today at 1:30pm.</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Update:</strong> everything I’m hearing says that the companies will be announcing a search partnership of some sort at 1:30. Since we’re talking about public companies here, I want to stress that this has not been confirmed by either Yahoo or Google at this point.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>It wasn&#8217;t long ago that <a title="All Not Happy In Yahoo Land" href="http://www.everyjoe.com/all-not-happy-in-yahoo-land/" target="_blank">I wrote about Yahoo! managers not wanting a Google partnership</a>. Do they now want one because Microsoft isn&#8217;t interested anymore and they think that&#8217;s all they&#8217;ve got now? </p>
<p>I just can&#8217;t imagine this not being considered a monopoly if they consider other things Microsoft does is a monopoly.</p>
<p>What do you think?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/12/googleyahoo-announcement-at-130-this-afternoon/">Google/Yahoo Search Partnership Announcement At 1:30 This Afternoon</a></p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/google-and-yahoo-announcing-partnership-59/">Google and Yahoo Announcing Partnership?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/google-and-yahoo-announcing-partnership-59/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>