<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>EveryJoe &#187; Times</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.everyjoe.com/tag/times/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.everyjoe.com</link>
	<description>Sports News - Tech Reviews - Entertainment - Life Tips for EveryJoe</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 04:50:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Times sure is pretty</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/times-sure-is-pretty-109/</link>
		<comments>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/times-sure-is-pretty-109/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 05:30:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Juned</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RSS Reader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Times]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.afeedisborn.com/times-sure-is-pretty/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you have a Mac OS X   you might want to try Times. An RSS reader developed by Dustin MacDonald  and gives a new  and very pretty experience for Mac users.
Why is this so?
What makes Times different from the other Mac RSS Readers?

For me it seems that Times is an effective, not to say pretty, RSS Reader because:
1. It looks and feels like reading a newspaper or magazine.
2. Through its features and protocols makes the punter choose feeds carefully, ie eliminates backlog
Times developer Dustin MacDonald&#8217;s gives a good description of what Time is in his post, [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/times-sure-is-pretty-109/">Times sure is pretty</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you have a Mac OS X   you might want to try Times. An RSS reader developed by <a href="http://www.dustinmacdonald.com/blog/">Dustin MacDonald </a> and gives a new  and very pretty experience for Mac users.</p>
<p>Why is this so?</p>
<p>What makes Times different from the other Mac RSS Readers?<br />
<span id="more-20116"></span></p>
<p>For me it seems that Times is an effective, not to say pretty, RSS Reader because:</p>
<p>1. It looks and feels like reading a newspaper or magazine.</p>
<p>2. Through its features and protocols makes the punter choose feeds carefully, ie eliminates backlog</p>
<p>Times developer Dustin MacDonald&#8217;s gives a good description of what Time is in his post, <a href="http://www.dustinmacdonald.com/blog/2008/04/what-is-times.html">What is Times</a>. And Bob Rudi wrote an extensive post/ review, <a href="http://theappleblog.com/2008/04/27/read-rss-newsfeeds-in-style-with-times/#more-3124">Read RSS Newsfeeds In Style With &#8220;Times&#8221;</a>, at <a href="http://theappleblog.com/">the Apple Blog</a>. I strongly recommend reading both posts before downloading this pretty rss reader.</p>
<p>Download it <a href="http://www.acrylicapps.com/times/">here</a>. </p>
<p>It sure is pretty. If I were a Mac user I would download it and try it.</p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/times-sure-is-pretty-109/">Times sure is pretty</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/times-sure-is-pretty-109/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>