<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>EveryJoe &#187; trademark</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.everyjoe.com/tag/trademark/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.everyjoe.com</link>
	<description>Sports News - Tech Reviews - Entertainment - Life Tips for EveryJoe</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 15:36:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Sony files trademark for “Resistance 2”</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/sony-files-trademark-for-%e2%80%9cresistance-2%e2%80%9d-81/</link>
		<comments>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/sony-files-trademark-for-%e2%80%9cresistance-2%e2%80%9d-81/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 04:21:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[resistance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fpsrantings.com/2007/12/28/sony-files-trademark-for-%e2%80%9cresistance-2%e2%80%9d/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Sony filed a new trademark, and it’s not for “PlayStation 4.” Instead, the trademark is for &#8220;Resistance 2,&#8221; which is expected to be the sequel to the PlayStation 3’s best-selling title so far. Bet you weren’t surprised.
We saw this coming light years away. Aside from the recent buzz, cash cows franchises aren’t new to the industry so a sequel to Resistance: Fall of Man makes perfect sense.
Is Sony planning on angering another European church? Who knows? After all, SCEA’s spat with the Church of England certainly helped sell a few thousand copies, so the Resistance franchise could use this as [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/sony-files-trademark-for-%e2%80%9cresistance-2%e2%80%9d-81/">Sony files trademark for “Resistance 2”</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.everyjoe.com/files/81/2007/12/resistance.jpg" alt="Resistance: Fall of Man gets a sequel" /></p>
<p>Sony filed a new trademark, and it’s not for “PlayStation 4.” Instead, the <a href="http://tarr.uspto.gov/servlet/tarr?regser=serial&amp;entry=77355210">trademark</a> is for &#8220;Resistance 2,&#8221; which is expected to be the sequel to the PlayStation 3’s best-selling title so far. Bet you weren’t surprised.</p>
<p>We saw this coming light years away. Aside from the recent <a href="http://softrockhallelujah.blogspot.com/2007/10/first-ever-resistance-fall-of-man-2.html">buzz</a>, <s>cash cows</s> franchises aren’t new to the industry so a sequel to <em>Resistance: Fall of Man</em> makes perfect sense.</p>
<p>Is Sony planning on angering another European church? Who knows? After all, SCEA’s <a href="http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/s/1008/1008758_church_blasts_sony_game.html">spat</a> with the Church of England certainly helped sell a few thousand copies, so the <em>Resistance</em> franchise could use this as a publicity stunt for each installment.</p>
<p><a href="http://tarr.uspto.gov/servlet/tarr?regser=serial&amp;entry=77355210">Read</a></p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/sony-files-trademark-for-%e2%80%9cresistance-2%e2%80%9d-81/">Sony files trademark for “Resistance 2”</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/sony-files-trademark-for-%e2%80%9cresistance-2%e2%80%9d-81/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
