<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>EveryJoe &#187; Video Sharing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.everyjoe.com/tag/video-sharing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.everyjoe.com</link>
	<description>Sports News - Tech Reviews - Entertainment - Life Tips for EveryJoe</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 21:11:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Using Radar to Share Photos and Video</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/using-radar-to-share-photos-and-video/</link>
		<comments>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/using-radar-to-share-photos-and-video/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 20:55:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Bean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flickr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photo-Sharing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Radar.net]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video Sharing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/using-radar-to-share-photos-and-video/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A while back my brother gave me the heads up about a website called Radar.net. Today another twitter friend recommended the site to me. Normally I&#8217;m pretty good with peer pressure, but since two people asked me to check it out, I figure I will.

The basics of the site are a place and a service for you to share videos and photos with others whether it be on the Radar.net site, twitter, Facebook, flickr or your own blog. All the features you&#8217;d expect are here and then some.
I&#8217;ve normally been a fan of TwitPic to share photos on twitter, but [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/using-radar-to-share-photos-and-video/">Using Radar to Share Photos and Video</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A while back <a title="What Bill Thinks" href="http://www.whatbillthinks.com" target="_blank">my brother</a> gave me the heads up about a website called <a title="Radar.net" href="http://radar.net" target="_blank">Radar.net</a>. Today another <a title="Adambassador on twitter" href="http://www.twitter.com/Adambassador" target="_blank">twitter friend</a> recommended the site to me. Normally I&#8217;m pretty good with peer pressure, but since two people asked me to check it out, I figure I will.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/files/2009/08/radar.gif"><img style="border-right-width: 0px;border-top-width: 0px;border-bottom-width: 0px;border-left-width: 0px" src="http://www.everyjoe.com/files/2009/08/radar_thumb.gif" border="0" alt="radar" width="575" height="242" /></a></p>
<p>The basics of the site are a place and a service for you to share videos and photos with others whether it be on the <a title="Radar.net" href="http://radar.net" target="_blank">Radar.net</a> site, <a title="Twitter" href="http://www.twitter.com/bnpositive" target="_blank">twitter</a>, <a href="http://www.facebook.com" target="_blank">Facebook</a>, <a href="http://www.flickr.com" target="_blank">flickr</a> or your own blog. All the features you&#8217;d expect are here and then some.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve normally been a fan of <a title="TwitPic" href="http://www.twitpic.com" target="_blank">TwitPic</a> to share photos on <a title="Twitter" href="http://www.twitter.com/bnpositive" target="_blank">twitter</a>, but since they&#8217;re still not taking advantage of the Oauth functionality, I haven&#8217;t been using them as much. I still haven&#8217;t gotten <a href="http://www.facebook.com" target="_blank">Facebook</a> to allow me to post images from my phone yet for some reason either, so I&#8217;m hoping this service will kill these two birds (well, one bird and one face) with one stone.</p>
<p>Sign-up for an account on <a title="Radar" href="http://radar.net" target="_blank">Radar</a>, link your <a title="Twitter" href="http://www.twitter.com/bnpositive" target="_blank">twitter</a>, <a href="http://www.facebook.com" target="_blank">Facebook</a> and <a href="http://www.flickr.com" target="_blank">flickr</a> accounts and you&#8217;re ready to roll. You&#8217;ll get a private <a title="Radar" href="http://radar.net" target="_blank">Radar</a> email address to use to send images to when you want to share them. There&#8217;s also a mobile app you can download to make it even easier to send images from your phone while you&#8217;re on the go.</p>
<p>When you make an update to <a title="Radar" href="http://radar.net" target="_blank">Radar</a>, you can decide whether or not to include the update to your <a title="Twitter" href="http://www.twitter.com/bnpositive" target="_blank">twitter</a> or <a href="http://www.facebook.com" target="_blank">Facebook</a> feeds as well. Very nice and very easy to get going on.</p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/using-radar-to-share-photos-and-video/">Using Radar to Share Photos and Video</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/using-radar-to-share-photos-and-video/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Crossposts Get Most Play on YouTube</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/crossposts-get-most-play-on-youtube-184/</link>
		<comments>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/crossposts-get-most-play-on-youtube-184/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 13:29:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Abundo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TubeMogul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video Sharing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insideonlinevideo.com/2008/07/16/crossposts-get-most-play-on-youtube/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Anyone who crossposts videos to multiple video-sharing sites already knows this, but TubeMogul now confirms it: when posted to multiple sites, your video will get the most views on YouTube. TubeMogul posts and tracks creators&#8217; videos across multiple sites, so they know of what they speak.
Post from: EveryJoe
Crossposts Get Most Play on YouTube
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/crossposts-get-most-play-on-youtube-184/">Crossposts Get Most Play on YouTube</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div align="center"><img src='http://www.everyjoe.com/files/184/2008/07/youtube-views.gif' alt='Video-Sharing Site Views' border='0' /></div>
<p>Anyone who crossposts videos to multiple video-sharing sites already knows this, but <a href="http://www.tubemogul.com/">TubeMogul</a> now <a href="http://newteevee.com/2008/07/15/youtube-most-effective-vid-distributor/">confirms</a> it: when posted to multiple sites, your video will get the most views on YouTube. TubeMogul posts and tracks creators&#8217; videos across multiple sites, so they know of what they speak.</p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/crossposts-get-most-play-on-youtube-184/">Crossposts Get Most Play on YouTube</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/crossposts-get-most-play-on-youtube-184/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>12seconds: Video Twitter</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/12seconds-video-twitter-184/</link>
		<comments>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/12seconds-video-twitter-184/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 20:27:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Abundo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[12seconds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video Sharing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insideonlinevideo.com/2008/06/26/12seconds-video-twitter/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
12seconds is exactly what its name implies: a video-sharing site with a twelve-second length restriction. Yes, it&#8217;s video Twitter, and they&#8217;re not ashamed to call themselves that.
Given that Twitter&#8217;s having trouble scaling with just text, you have to wonder how a video Twitter would scale. Twitter&#8217;s architecture is built to handle its microblogging aspect, but not its messaging aspect; that&#8217;s why it goes down a lot. Hope 12seconds avoids that pitfall.
Post from: EveryJoe
12seconds: Video Twitter
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/12seconds-video-twitter-184/">12seconds: Video Twitter</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div align="center"><object type="application/x-shockwave-flash" data="http://12seconds.tv/players/remotePlayer.swf" width="430" height="360" ><param name="movie" value="http://12seconds.tv/players/remotePlayer.swf" /><param name="FlashVars" value="video=files/clips/userclip_5_1205045727.flv&#038;host=" /></object></div>
<p><a href="http://12seconds.tv/">12seconds</a> is exactly what its name implies: a video-sharing site with a twelve-second length restriction.<span id="more-22010"></span> Yes, it&#8217;s video <a href="http://www.twitter.com">Twitter</a>, and they&#8217;re <a href="http://newteevee.com/2008/06/26/one-to-watch-12seconds/">not ashamed</a> to call themselves that.</p>
<p>Given that Twitter&#8217;s having trouble scaling with <em>just text,</em> you have to wonder how a <em>video</em> Twitter would scale. Twitter&#8217;s architecture is built to handle its microblogging aspect, but not its messaging aspect; that&#8217;s why it goes down a lot. Hope 12seconds avoids that pitfall.</p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/12seconds-video-twitter-184/">12seconds: Video Twitter</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/12seconds-video-twitter-184/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DivX Kills Stage6</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/divx-kills-stage6-184/</link>
		<comments>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/divx-kills-stage6-184/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 13:54:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Abundo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Hell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stage6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video Sharing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insideonlinevideo.com/2008/02/27/divx-kills-stage6/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[See, this is why small agile players thrive inside online video. Unless they happen to be the clueful likes of Google or CBS, big corporations tend to trip over themselves in this space. Michael Arrington recounts the long, sad, dramatic tale behind the imminent shutdown of high-quality video site Stage6. 
Long story short: big egos at parent company DivX alienate smart team at promising startup Stage6. All this happens just as Stage6 was about to get $27 million in investment and $10 million in revenue.
DivX just threw away a fortune over an executive ego battle. How fitting that the CEO [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/divx-kills-stage6-184/">DivX Kills Stage6</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See, this is why small agile players thrive inside online video. Unless they happen to be the clueful likes of Google or CBS, big corporations tend to trip over themselves in this space. <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/26/serious-drama-and-lots-of-stupidity-behind-stage6-shutdown/" target="_blank">Michael Arrington</a> recounts the long, sad, dramatic tale behind the imminent shutdown of high-quality video site <a href="http://www.stage6.com/" target="_blank">Stage6</a>. </p>
<p>Long story short: big egos at parent company <a href="http://www.divx.com/" target="_blank">DivX</a> alienate smart team at promising startup Stage6. All this happens just as Stage6 was about to get $27 million in investment and $10 million in revenue.</p>
<p>DivX just threw away a fortune over an executive ego battle. How fitting that the CEO of DivX is named Kevin <em>Hell.</em></p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/divx-kills-stage6-184/">DivX Kills Stage6</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/divx-kills-stage6-184/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vertical Video Can&#8217;t Compete on Content</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/vertical-video-cant-compete-on-content-184/</link>
		<comments>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/vertical-video-cant-compete-on-content-184/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 09:44:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Abundo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video Sharing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insideonlinevideo.com/2008/01/13/vertical-video-cant-compete-on-content/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We\\\\\\\&#8217;re seeing all sorts of online video sharing sites catering to various verticals &#8212; from intellectuals to venture capitalists to gamers to otaku to music fans to masturbators. Barely a week goes by that I don\\\\\\\&#8217;t hear about some startup touting itself as \\\\\\\&#8221;YouTube for ________\\\\\\\&#8221;. Porn and piracy aside, I don\\\\\\\&#8217;t see any way these guys can differentiate themselves from general video sharing sites unless they offer features (not just content) specifically useful to their niches.\\\\r\\\\n\\\\r\\\\nThat\\\\\\\&#8217;s why I don\\\\\\\&#8217;t blog a lot of these vertical video sharing sites unless they offer some feature especially useful to their verticals. Examples [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/vertical-video-cant-compete-on-content-184/">Vertical Video Can&#8217;t Compete on Content</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We\\\\\\\&#8217;re seeing all sorts of online video sharing sites catering to various verticals &#8212; from <a href=\\\\\\\"http://www.bigthink.com/\\\\\\\" target=\\\\\\\"_blank\\\\\\\">intellectuals</a> to <a href=\\\\\\\"http://vator.tv/\\\\\\\" target=\\\\\\\"_blank\\\\\\\">venture capitalists</a> to <a href=\\\\\\\"http://www.wegame.com\\\\\\\" target=\\\\\\\"_blank\\\\\\\">gamers</a> to <a href=\\\\\\\"http://stormberry.tv/\\\\\\\" target=\\\\\\\"_blank\\\\\\\">otaku</a> to <a href=\\\\\\\"http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/middio-searches-youtube-music-videos-184/\\\\\\\" target=\\\\\\\"_blank\\\\\\\">music fans</a> to <a href=\\\\\\\"http://www.pornotube.com\\\\\\\" target=\\\\\\\"_blank\\\\\\\">masturbators</a>. Barely a week goes by that I don\\\\\\\&#8217;t hear about some startup touting itself as \\\\\\\&#8221;YouTube for ________\\\\\\\&#8221;. Porn and piracy aside, I don\\\\\\\&#8217;t see any way these guys can differentiate themselves from general video sharing sites unless they offer <strong>features</strong> (not just <strong>content</strong>) specifically useful to their niches.\\\\r\\\\n\\\\r\\\\nThat\\\\\\\&#8217;s why I don\\\\\\\&#8217;t blog a lot of these vertical video sharing sites unless they offer some feature especially useful to their verticals. Examples include Storm Berry\\\\\\\&#8217;s <a href=\\\\\\\"http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/storm-berry-tv-online-subtitling-for-youtube-videos-184/\\\\\\\" target=\\\\\\\"_blank\\\\\\\">subtitling</a> for otaku and WeGame\\\\\\\&#8217;s <a href=\\\\\\\"http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/wegame-youtube-for-gamers-184/\\\\\\\" target=\\\\\\\"_blank\\\\\\\">screencasting</a> for gamers. Now that anyone can post videos about anything anywhere &#8212; and find any audience anywhere in a <a href=\\\\\\\"http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/google-introduces-video-sitemaps-184/\\\\\\\" target=\\\\\\\"_blank\\\\\\\">search-powered</a> video world &#8212; vertical video sharing sites cannot compete on content alone.</p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/vertical-video-cant-compete-on-content-184/">Vertical Video Can&#8217;t Compete on Content</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/vertical-video-cant-compete-on-content-184/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to Cheat on YouTube</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/how-to-cheat-on-youtube-184/</link>
		<comments>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/how-to-cheat-on-youtube-184/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2007 15:28:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Abundo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising / Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video Sharing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insideonlinevideo.com/2007/11/24/how-to-cheat-on-youtube/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google\&#8217;s antispam abilities are legendary, and many YouTubers wish some of those abilities would rub off on YouTube. That need has been further underscored by Dan Ackerman Greenberg, a Stanford student who\&#8217;s revealed some horrific ways to cheat on YouTube. He knows of what he speaks, because he\&#8217;s a hired gun for corporates faking cluefulness.\r\n\r\nHis repertoire of dirty tricks ranges from fake headlines to sockpuppet comments. While market leader YouTube is the primary target, the impact of this trickery will only get bigger as other video sites gain popularity.\r\n\r\nWhile reading Dan\&#8217;s post makes me sick to my stomach, it certainly [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/how-to-cheat-on-youtube-184/">How to Cheat on YouTube</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google\&#8217;s antispam abilities are legendary, and many YouTubers <a href=\"http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/a-plea-for-youtube-spamment-control-184/\" target=\"_blank\">wish</a> some of those abilities would rub off on YouTube. That need has been further underscored by Dan Ackerman Greenberg, a Stanford student who\&#8217;s revealed some <a href=\"http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/22/the-secret-strategies-behind-many-viral-videos/\" target=\"_blank\">horrific ways to cheat on YouTube</a>. He knows of what he speaks, because he\&#8217;s a hired gun for corporates faking cluefulness.\r\n\r\nHis repertoire of dirty tricks ranges from fake headlines to sockpuppet comments. While <a href=\"http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/youtube-market-share-up-184/\" target=\"_blank\">market leader</a> YouTube is the primary target, the impact of this trickery will only get bigger as other video sites gain popularity.\r\n\r\nWhile reading Dan\&#8217;s post makes me sick to my stomach, it certainly highlights issues video-sharing sites must face as they become <a href=\"http://www.everyjoe.com/2007/07/18/75-of-online-americans-watch-online-video/\" target=\"_blank\">increasingly attractive targets for unscrupulous advertisers</a>.</p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/how-to-cheat-on-youtube-184/">How to Cheat on YouTube</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/how-to-cheat-on-youtube-184/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SciVee: YouTube for Science</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/scivee-youtube-for-science-184/</link>
		<comments>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/scivee-youtube-for-science-184/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 08:30:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Abundo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video Sharing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insideonlinevideo.com/2007/08/21/scivee-youtube-for-science/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
How geeky can you get? Find out at SciVee, a video-sharing site for presenting scientific papers. Niche-specific features include figures, references, and full papers.
My biggest beef: no embeds. It&#8217;s a huge missed opportunity: SciVee embeds could incorporate SlideShare-like features for the figures and Scribd-like features for the papers. Then again, bloggers probably don&#8217;t want to put their readers to sleep with talk of scientific papers.
Post from: EveryJoe
SciVee: YouTube for Science
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/scivee-youtube-for-science-184/">SciVee: YouTube for Science</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://scivee.com/" target="_blank"><img src='http://www.everyjoe.com/files/184/2007/08/scivee.gif' alt='SciVee' border='0' /></a></p>
<p>How geeky can you get? Find out at <a href="http://scivee.com/" target="_blank">SciVee</a>, a video-sharing site for presenting scientific papers. Niche-specific features include figures, references, and full papers.</p>
<p>My biggest beef: no embeds. It&#8217;s a huge missed opportunity: SciVee embeds could incorporate <a href="http://www.slideshare.net/" target="_blank">SlideShare</a>-like features for the figures and <a href="http://www.scribd.com/" target="_blank">Scribd</a>-like features for the papers. Then again, bloggers probably don&#8217;t want to put their readers to sleep with talk of scientific papers.</p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/scivee-youtube-for-science-184/">SciVee: YouTube for Science</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/scivee-youtube-for-science-184/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BBC: Embeds Work</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/bbc-embeds-work-184/</link>
		<comments>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/bbc-embeds-work-184/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 06:07:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Abundo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video Sharing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insideonlinevideo.com/2007/07/06/bbc-embeds-work/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Oliver Luft, Om Malik, and Liz Gannes all highlight how the BBC is looking for greater relevance and added value in online video use. I&#8217;d like to point out something else BBC News Interactive head Pete Clifton mentioned at the Future of News Conference, something far too many online marketers still don&#8217;t understand: video embeds generate clickthroughs.
&#8220;The results from the trial we did with embedded video were hugely positive in terms of the conversion rate of people reading the stories and watching the video,&#8221; Mr Clifton told the conference.
&#8220;With the embedded video, up to 40 per cent of people were [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/bbc-embeds-work-184/">BBC: Embeds Work</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src='http://www.everyjoe.com/files/184/2007/07/bbc.gif' alt='BBC' border='0' /></p>
<p><a href="http://www.journalism.co.uk/news/story3407.shtml" target="_blank">Oliver Luft</a>, <a href="http://gigaom.com/2007/07/05/news-videos-what-are-they-good-for-relevance/" target="_blank">Om Malik</a>, and <a href="http://newteevee.com/2007/07/05/bbc-video-for-videos-sake-isnt-worth-it/" target="_blank">Liz Gannes</a> all highlight how the BBC is looking for greater relevance and added value in online video use. I&#8217;d like to point out something else BBC News Interactive head Pete Clifton mentioned at the Future of News Conference, something far too many online marketers still don&#8217;t understand: video embeds generate clickthroughs.<span id="more-21578"></span></p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;The results from the trial we did with embedded video were hugely positive in terms of the conversion rate of people reading the stories and watching the video,&#8221; Mr Clifton told the conference.</p>
<p>&#8220;With the embedded video, up to 40 per cent of people were watching it. In its normal format, when you watch it in a different place [in a standalone player], it&#8217;s about two per cent.</p></blockquote>
<p>The BBC has always held a positive attitude towards video superdistribution, hence their <a href="http://www.emergingearth.com/bbc-signs-unprecedented-youtube-deal/" target="_blank">awesome deal with YouTube</a>. I&#8217;m not surprised they&#8217;d quantify the benefits of embeds. Far too many online video producers still trap their videos on their sites like greedy little dinosaurs.</p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/bbc-embeds-work-184/">BBC: Embeds Work</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/bbc-embeds-work-184/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>YouTube Launches Active Sharing</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/youtube-launches-active-sharing-184/</link>
		<comments>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/youtube-launches-active-sharing-184/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 03:38:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Abundo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video Sharing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insideonlinevideo.com/?p=63</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
YouTube just added a very &#8220;live&#8221; community feature: active sharing, an opt-in service which displays the usernames of people currently watching a specific video. It also displays your recent viewing history on your profile.
This thing&#8217;s just begging for chatroom functionality.
Post from: EveryJoe
YouTube Launches Active Sharing
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/youtube-launches-active-sharing-184/">YouTube Launches Active Sharing</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div align="center"><img src='http://insideonlinevideo.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/04/youtube-active-sharing.gif' border='0' alt='YouTube Active Sharing' /></div>
<p>YouTube just added a very &#8220;live&#8221; community feature: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/activesharing_about" target="_blank">active sharing</a>, an opt-in service which displays the usernames of people currently watching a specific video. It also displays your recent viewing history on your profile.</p>
<p>This thing&#8217;s just <strong>begging</strong> for chatroom functionality.</p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/youtube-launches-active-sharing-184/">YouTube Launches Active Sharing</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/youtube-launches-active-sharing-184/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jen kisses Courtney. Sweet.</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/jen-kisses-courtney-sweet-184/</link>
		<comments>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/jen-kisses-courtney-sweet-184/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 02:30:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Minic Rivera</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video Sharing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insideonlinevideo.com/?p=51</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Courtney Cox and Jennifer Aniston are friends. They both came from Friends. So, it appears that Cox needs some help to boost the ratings of her show called Dirt. So what do you do? Ask your friend Aniston to appear as guest. Cool. How about asking your friend for some kissing scene? More coolness. It&#8217;s a hit in YouTube. See for yourself and tell me what you think about it.

Post from: EveryJoe
Jen kisses Courtney. Sweet.
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/jen-kisses-courtney-sweet-184/">Jen kisses Courtney. Sweet.</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Courtney Cox and Jennifer Aniston are friends. They both came from Friends. So, it appears that Cox needs some help to boost the ratings of her show called Dirt. So what do you do? Ask your friend Aniston to appear as guest. Cool. How about asking your friend for some kissing scene? More coolness. It&#8217;s a hit in YouTube. See for yourself and tell me what you think about it.</p>
<p><object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/F92XKkgeZFk"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/F92XKkgeZFk" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"></embed></object></p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/jen-kisses-courtney-sweet-184/">Jen kisses Courtney. Sweet.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/jen-kisses-courtney-sweet-184/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>