<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>EveryJoe &#187; video_clip</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.everyjoe.com/tag/video_clip/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.everyjoe.com</link>
	<description>Sports News - Tech Reviews - Entertainment - Life Tips for EveryJoe</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 02:53:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Kwari’s visuals may end up looking up-to-date</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/kwari%e2%80%99s-visuals-may-end-up-looking-up-to-date-81/</link>
		<comments>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/kwari%e2%80%99s-visuals-may-end-up-looking-up-to-date-81/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 19:35:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Huxley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kwari]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reflections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video_clip]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fpsrantings.com/2007/10/09/kwari%e2%80%99s-visuals-may-end-up-looking-up-to-date/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don’t normally retract my statements, but when I viewed a trailer showing off Kwari’s levels, I realized that I may be wrong about the game looking circa 1999. I may not have seen any 3D character models yet, but bear with me and watch the clip below:

Is it just me, or are the shaders used in the game seem rather “current-gen”? The reflections actually look pretty good, but we’ve yet to see everything put together. Are there post-processing effects? What kind of physics does the game have? Is the level of detail used by Huxley possible in Kwari? Are [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/kwari%e2%80%99s-visuals-may-end-up-looking-up-to-date-81/">Kwari’s visuals <i>may</i> end up looking up-to-date</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don’t normally retract my statements, but when I viewed a trailer showing off Kwari’s levels, I realized that I <em>may</em> be wrong about the game <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/kwari-shows-off-game-levels-dated-looking-visuals-81/">looking</a> circa 1999. I may not have seen any 3D character models yet, but bear with me and watch the clip below:</p>
<p><object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/at6wRz7pmPU"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/at6wRz7pmPU" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"></embed></object></p>
<p>Is it just me, or are the shaders used in the game seem rather “current-gen”? The reflections actually look pretty good, but we’ve yet to see everything put together. Are there post-processing effects? What kind of physics does the game have? Is the level of detail used by Huxley possible in Kwari? Are the reflections the only thing that makes the game look updated? Would Kwari look <em>and</em> play great?</p>
<p>There are so many questions. Questions that hopefully get answered when the beta does take place; and when it does, expect me to be there.</p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/kwari%e2%80%99s-visuals-may-end-up-looking-up-to-date-81/">Kwari’s visuals <i>may</i> end up looking up-to-date</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/kwari%e2%80%99s-visuals-may-end-up-looking-up-to-date-81/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More Gears of War action can be seen in new clip</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/more-gears-of-war-action-can-be-seen-in-new-clip-81/</link>
		<comments>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/more-gears-of-war-action-can-be-seen-in-new-clip-81/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 19:18:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carnage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gears_of_war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pc_version]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shooter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shooters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video_clip]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fpsrantings.com/2007/10/09/more-gears-of-war-action-can-be-seen-in-new-clip/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you’re mad about Gears of War like I am, then you’d love me for posting a new video clip showing some satisfying action. According to GameTrailers’ description, the montage shows the new content that’s exclusive to Gears&#8217; PC version. Enjoy the carnage and cussing.

I just can’t help but notice that while it’s just been a year since Gears came out, there are already other prettier games around, like Crysis. Then again, I’ve yet to see Gears run in my machine with all the eye candy it can handle. If you’re having doubts of running Crysis when it comes out [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/more-gears-of-war-action-can-be-seen-in-new-clip-81/">More Gears of War action can be seen in new clip</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you’re mad about Gears of War like I am, then you’d love me for posting a new video clip showing some satisfying action. According to GameTrailers’ description, the montage shows the new content that’s exclusive to Gears&#8217; PC version. Enjoy the carnage and cussing.</p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000"  codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=8,0,0,0" id="gtembed" width="480" height="409"><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="sameDomain" /><param name="movie" value="http://www.gametrailers.com/remote_wrap.php?mid=25994"/><param name="quality" value="high" /><embed src="http://www.gametrailers.com/remote_wrap.php?mid=25994" swLiveConnect="true" name="gtembed" align="middle" allowScriptAccess="sameDomain" quality="high" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflashplayer" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="480" height="409"></embed></object></p>
<p>I just can’t help but notice that while it’s just been a year since Gears came out, there are already other prettier games around, like Crysis. Then again, I’ve yet to see Gears run in my machine with all the eye candy it can handle. If you’re having doubts of running Crysis when it comes out next month, you can always go for the proven Gears of War for the PC. What am I saying? I’d pick Gears any day even if I could run Crysis with all the crazy effects using DirectX 10. </p>
<p>If you’re drooling over Gears like I am, do drop me a line so that we can do some serious fragging in November.</p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/more-gears-of-war-action-can-be-seen-in-new-clip-81/">More Gears of War action can be seen in new clip</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/more-gears-of-war-action-can-be-seen-in-new-clip-81/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
