<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>EveryJoe &#187; Yahoo Buzz</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.everyjoe.com/tag/yahoo-buzz/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.everyjoe.com</link>
	<description>Sports News - Tech Reviews - Entertainment - Life Tips for EveryJoe</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 23:27:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Yahoo Buzz is Just Concentrated</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/yahoo-buzz-is-just-concentrated-608/</link>
		<comments>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/yahoo-buzz-is-just-concentrated-608/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 10:31:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jayvee Fernandez</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo Buzz]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techsideup.com/yahoo-buzz-is-just-concentrated/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Richard McManus and Michael Arrington both sing praises to Yahoo Buzz, claiming its traffic firehose is potentially stronger than Digg&#8217;s thanks to Yahoo&#8217;s mainstream audience. I propose that Yahoo Buzz&#8217;s firehose seems stronger only because it&#8217;s more concentrated.
While you can vote stories up on Buzz, you cannot submit stories. Only Yahoo can do that, from a small pool of invite-only publishers. That focuses all traffic from Buzz on a few selected sites &#8212; which will, naturally, come out with big press releases about it. I must praise Yahoo on their PR strategy there.
The real test will come if and when [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/yahoo-buzz-is-just-concentrated-608/">Yahoo Buzz is Just Concentrated</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://buzz.yahoo.com/" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.everyjoe.com/files/608/2008/03/yahoo-buzz.png" alt="Yahoo Buzz" border="0"/></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/yahoo_buzz_is_a_game_changer.php" target="_blank">Richard McManus</a> and <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/16/yahoo-buzz-yahoo-reveals-stats-from-the-first-two-weeks/" target="_blank">Michael Arrington</a> both sing praises to <a href="http://buzz.yahoo.com/" target="_blank">Yahoo Buzz</a>, claiming its traffic firehose is potentially stronger than Digg&#8217;s thanks to Yahoo&#8217;s mainstream audience. I propose that Yahoo Buzz&#8217;s firehose seems stronger only because it&#8217;s more <strong>concentrated.</strong><span id="more-49827"></span></p>
<p>While you can vote stories up on Buzz, you cannot <strong>submit</strong> stories. Only Yahoo can do that, from a small pool of invite-only publishers. That focuses all traffic from Buzz on a few selected sites &#8212; which will, naturally, come out with big press releases about it. I must praise Yahoo on their PR strategy there.</p>
<p>The real test will come if and when Yahoo Buzz allows users to submit stories. Until then, it just brings higher traffic to sites that <strong>already</strong> have high traffic. It&#8217;s just exposing more mainstream media to its mainstream audience &#8212; nothing groundbreaking there, really.</p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/yahoo-buzz-is-just-concentrated-608/">Yahoo Buzz is Just Concentrated</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/yahoo-buzz-is-just-concentrated-608/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>