<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>EveryJoe &#187; zero emissions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.everyjoe.com/tag/zero-emissions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.everyjoe.com</link>
	<description>Sports News - Tech Reviews - Entertainment - Life Tips for EveryJoe</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 22:40:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>CA votes to lower standards &#8211;&gt; by 70%</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/ca-votes-to-lower-standards-by-70-337/</link>
		<comments>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/ca-votes-to-lower-standards-by-70-337/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 16:35:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hilary</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california air resources board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PHEV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PHEVs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zero emissions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ecofriendlydriver.com/2008/03/30/ca-votes-to-lower-standards-by-70/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At one time, the California Air Resources Board was plowing the way for green transportation incentives by requiring automakers to focus on zero emissions technology. In a frustrating move Thursday, they voted to lessen that obligation by 70%. <p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/ca-votes-to-lower-standards-by-70-337/">CA votes to lower standards &#8211;> by 70%</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At one time, the California Air Resources Board was plowing the way for green transportation incentives by requiring automakers to focus on zero emissions technology. In a frustrating move Thursday, they voted to lessen that obligation <strong>by 70%</strong>. It&#8217;s okay, they say, because we&#8217;ve told automakers they need to make at least 60,000 plug-in hybrids by 2014. Do they really think we don&#8217;t know that was going to happen anyway? Between the plug-in Prius and the Volt, we&#8217;ll reach that number by 2011.</p>
<p>From <a href="http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/state/20080328-9999-1n28carrules.html" title="Ca Air Resources Board screws consumers" target="_blank">SignOnSandDiego</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<blockquote><p><font class="columntexthead"> Overview  </font><font class="columntext"> </font></p>
<p><font class="columntext"><strong>Background</strong>: California adopted a landmark program in 1990 to require that<br />
10 percent of new cars sold by the major auto companies be nonpolluting by 2003. The goal was reduced to 25,000 zero-emission vehicles in California by 2014, far below the original mandate. </font></p>
<p><font class="columntext">      <strong>What&#8217;s changing:</strong> The goal was further reduced to 7,500 such vehicles. </font></p>
<p><font class="columntext"><strong>The future:</strong> The state will require automakers to sell nearly 60,000 plug-in hybrid vehicles in California and continue to develop technology that will allow mass production of pure zero-emission vehicles. </font></p></blockquote>
</blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;m shocked, and so disappointed. Everyone on that board had the opportunity to set standards to strive toward. The bar &#8211; at one time &#8211; may have been unreasonably high, but now it&#8217;s so unreasonably low that automakers don&#8217;t even have to raise their legs to get over it. It&#8217;s business as usual. Thankfully <strong><em>consumers</em></strong> are demanding better options.</p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/ca-votes-to-lower-standards-by-70-337/">CA votes to lower standards &#8211;> by 70%</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/ca-votes-to-lower-standards-by-70-337/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>