<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 1.5 Million Google Phones Pre-Sold; Still Ugly</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/15-million-google-phones-pre-sold-still-ugly/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/15-million-google-phones-pre-sold-still-ugly/</link>
	<description>Gadget News - Gadget Reviews - Gadget Tech Specs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 07:20:32 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Donny Chino</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/15-million-google-phones-pre-sold-still-ugly/comment-page-1/#comment-2622</link>
		<dc:creator>Donny Chino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 03:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thegadgetblog.com/2008/10/14/15-million-google-phones-pre-sold-still-ugly/#comment-2622</guid>
		<description>I agree, the google phone looks ugly. It&#039;s very disappointing. I have been looking forward to the release for months, and my expectation just sank once i saw how ugly it is. I think im going to buy the Iphone 3g instead just because the google phone looks cheaply made. Did you guys notice how thick it is also? Reminds me of sidekick 1! Overall, just a very ugly looking phone. I would never pay for an ugly hooker, why would i pay for an ugly phone?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, the google phone looks ugly. It&#8217;s very disappointing. I have been looking forward to the release for months, and my expectation just sank once i saw how ugly it is. I think im going to buy the Iphone 3g instead just because the google phone looks cheaply made. Did you guys notice how thick it is also? Reminds me of sidekick 1! Overall, just a very ugly looking phone. I would never pay for an ugly hooker, why would i pay for an ugly phone?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cool-P</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/15-million-google-phones-pre-sold-still-ugly/comment-page-1/#comment-2380</link>
		<dc:creator>Cool-P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 19:39:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thegadgetblog.com/2008/10/14/15-million-google-phones-pre-sold-still-ugly/#comment-2380</guid>
		<description>While it is impressive that they have that many pre-orderd, I just cant get over the look of it.  If they are trying to compete with the iphone they need a better design.  One of the reason I bought my iPhone was the simple design.  No face to open and close (and potentially break I may add).  Just a sleek gadget.  The Google phone seems like a glorified sidekick.  And those are some of the worst.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While it is impressive that they have that many pre-orderd, I just cant get over the look of it.  If they are trying to compete with the iphone they need a better design.  One of the reason I bought my iPhone was the simple design.  No face to open and close (and potentially break I may add).  Just a sleek gadget.  The Google phone seems like a glorified sidekick.  And those are some of the worst.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>