<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: People Find Norton Antivirus Slow</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/people-find-norton-antivirus-slow/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/people-find-norton-antivirus-slow/</link>
	<description>Gadget News - Gadget Reviews - Gadget Tech Specs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 17:52:35 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Eugene</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/people-find-norton-antivirus-slow/comment-page-1/#comment-38580</link>
		<dc:creator>Eugene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 15:31:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/?p=4778#comment-38580</guid>
		<description>I think NAV not bad and even good. i did not have troubles with it.
But had it with Kaspersky when kido comes on my computer.
But it&#039;s another story...

Best Regards,
Eugene</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think NAV not bad and even good. i did not have troubles with it.<br />
But had it with Kaspersky when kido comes on my computer.<br />
But it&#8217;s another story&#8230;</p>
<p>Best Regards,<br />
Eugene</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cheap antivirus</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/people-find-norton-antivirus-slow/comment-page-1/#comment-34602</link>
		<dc:creator>cheap antivirus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 18:48:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/?p=4778#comment-34602</guid>
		<description>Actually in my opinion, Norton has overhauled its all of its Norton security lineup since the 2009 version. Since then, their Norton Antivirus, Internet Security, and even Norton 360 has low system impact. Review from big media such as PC Magazine and PC World has proven this. But poor for them, customers have already labeled their products as resource hogs. So there are still lots of homework for them to do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually in my opinion, Norton has overhauled its all of its Norton security lineup since the 2009 version. Since then, their Norton Antivirus, Internet Security, and even Norton 360 has low system impact. Review from big media such as PC Magazine and PC World has proven this. But poor for them, customers have already labeled their products as resource hogs. So there are still lots of homework for them to do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Norton and G.I. Joe Team Up to Save the Day! (Maybe Not?) : The Gadget Blog - Gadget News &#8211; Gadget Reviews &#8211; Gadget Tech Specs</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/people-find-norton-antivirus-slow/comment-page-1/#comment-30288</link>
		<dc:creator>Norton and G.I. Joe Team Up to Save the Day! (Maybe Not?) : The Gadget Blog - Gadget News &#8211; Gadget Reviews &#8211; Gadget Tech Specs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 11:31:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/?p=4778#comment-30288</guid>
		<description>[...] should be enough to scare viruses away from your computer, but given Norton&#8217;s reputation as the producer of slow computer security software, I&#8217;m not sure if the merchandising tie-in can live up to G.I. Joe&#8217;s fast and efficient [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] should be enough to scare viruses away from your computer, but given Norton&#8217;s reputation as the producer of slow computer security software, I&#8217;m not sure if the merchandising tie-in can live up to G.I. Joe&#8217;s fast and efficient [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>