<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Gadget Blog &#187; 2008</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/tag/2008/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog</link>
	<description>Gadget News - Gadget Reviews - Gadget Tech Specs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 12:30:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Conversations: Performance of the New MacBooks</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/conversations-performance-of-the-new-macbooks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/conversations-performance-of-the-new-macbooks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 14:58:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rico Mossesgeld</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Laptops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ramblings of a Gadget Geek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MacBook Pro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[performance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thegadgetblog.com/2008/10/17/conversations-performance-of-the-new-macbooks/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I mostly kept quiet last night while I chatted with Marco, the site guy, about just how much more powerful the new MacBooks are compared to their predecessors.
Marco: http://www.primatelabs.ca/blog/2008/10/macbook-and-macbook-pro-performance-october-2008/
Marco: not too much performance boost
Marco: even with ddr3
Rico: Lol, only the basic model has an appreciable boost
Marco: yeah
Marco: i told you
Marco: macbooks benefited more
Marco: benefited
Rico: especially with the discrete (but not dedicated) graphics
Marco: yeah
Marco: but it is cheaper
Marco: my probable advice would be 
Marco: if you&#8217;re upgrading from a 3 year old laptop
Marco: its worth it
Marco: but if like me
Rico: hahaha, agreed
Marco: someone who just has bought an mbp
Marco: not really [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog">The Gadget Blog</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I mostly kept quiet last night while I chatted with Marco, <a href="http://site-guy.com">the site guy</a>, about just how much more powerful <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/2008/10/15/with-apple-laptops-things-stay-the-same/">the new MacBooks</a> are compared to their predecessors.</p>
<p><span style="font-size:smaller;"><strong>Marco:</strong> http://www.primatelabs.ca/blog/2008/10/macbook-and-macbook-pro-performance-october-2008/<br />
<strong>Marco:</strong> not too much performance boost<br />
<strong>Marco:</strong> even with ddr3<br />
<strong>Rico:</strong> Lol, only the basic model has an appreciable boost<br />
<strong>Marco:</strong> yeah<br />
<strong>Marco:</strong> i told you<br />
<strong>Marco:</strong> macbooks benefited more<br />
<strong>Marco:</strong> benefited<br />
<strong>Rico:</strong> especially with the discrete (but not dedicated) graphics<br />
<strong>Marco:</strong> yeah<br />
<strong>Marco:</strong> but it is cheaper<br />
<strong>Marco:</strong> my probable advice would be <span id="more-2816"></span><br />
<strong>Marco:</strong> if you&#8217;re upgrading from a 3 year old laptop<br />
<strong>Marco:</strong> its worth it<br />
<strong>Marco:</strong> but if like me<br />
<strong>Rico:</strong> hahaha, agreed<br />
<strong>Marco:</strong> someone who just has bought an mbp<br />
<strong>Marco:</strong> not really worth it<br />
<strong>Marco:</strong> unless you have cash to burn<br />
<strong>Marco:</strong> the lack of performance gains could also be in the drivers<br />
<strong>Marco:</strong> remember apple writes their own chipset drivers<br />
<strong>Marco:</strong> and this is the first time they&#8217;re writing for nvidia based chipsets<br />
<strong>Marco:</strong> but regardless the gains are still negligible<br />
<strong>Rico:</strong> So this could probably improve over time?<br />
<strong>Rico:</strong> With updates and the like?<br />
<strong>Marco:</strong> it is possible<br />
<strong>Marco:</strong> but how much gain<br />
<strong>Marco:</strong> is still probably minute<br />
<strong>Marco:</strong> but the platform opens up very exciting possibilities when intel releases their nehalem family chips<br />
<strong>Marco:</strong> which offer mobile quadcore<br />
<strong>Marco:</strong> that with nvidia&#8217;s 9400m chipset could really usher in some amazingly fast notebooks by the start of next year<br />
<strong>Marco:</strong> probably in june at macworld<br />
<strong>Marco:</strong> future proofing has always been the forte of apple anyway<br />
<strong>Rico:</strong> nehalem?<br />
<strong>Marco:</strong> the next family of multicore processors<br />
<strong>Marco:</strong> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_Nehalem_(microarchitecture)<br />
<strong>Marco:</strong> right now it&#8217;s penryn<br />
<strong>Marco:</strong><br />
<strong>Marco:</strong> its also cool to note that apple thinks (well implied) that bluray will die soon.<br />
<strong>Marco:</strong> i think bluray hasnt enjoyed the ubiquitous popularity of dvd<br />
<strong>Marco:</strong> when dvd became standard<br />
<strong>Marco:</strong> infact bluray sales are down this year<br />
<strong>Rico:</strong> Ah, you mean all that talk about licensing complications keeping Apple from integrating Blu-Ray in the MacBook?<br />
<strong>Marco:</strong> because people prefer to get their hd content online<br />
<strong>Marco:</strong> lol<br />
<strong>Marco:</strong> yeah its not licensing complications really<br />
<strong>Marco:</strong> well that&#8217;s probably part of it<br />
<strong>Marco:</strong> but i think its more of not adapting something that is close to extinction anyway<br />
<strong>Marco:</strong> its cheaper to get your hd content via itunes<br />
<strong>Marco:</strong> or hulu<br />
<strong>Marco:</strong> than it is to buy a bluray disc<br />
<strong>Marco:</strong> let alone a bluray capable burner<br />
<strong>Marco:</strong> er<br />
<strong>Marco:</strong> player<br />
<strong>Marco:</strong> so i think apple believes that hd content&#8217;s future is through online distribution<br />
<strong>Marco:</strong> rather than through physical media<br />
<strong>Marco:</strong> like bluray<br />
<strong>Marco:</strong> but of course they cant really say that<br />
<strong>Marco:</strong> and that&#8217;s beside their official issues with licensing<br />
<strong>Rico:</strong> I know I know, it&#8217;s Apple&#8217;s marketing magic at work again<br />
<strong>Marco:</strong> hahah true</span></p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog">The Gadget Blog</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/conversations-performance-of-the-new-macbooks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>With Apple Laptops, Things Stay the Same</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/with-apple-laptops-things-stay-the-same/</link>
		<comments>http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/with-apple-laptops-things-stay-the-same/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 14:14:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rico Mossesgeld</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Laptops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MacBook Pro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the more things change the more they stay the same]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thegadgetblog.com/2008/10/15/with-apple-laptops-things-stay-the-same/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
So Jobs has finally spilled the beans on their new MacBooks, turning the MacBook into a sort of MacBook Pro lite. Friends who&#8217;ve been brainwashed by Apple&#8217;s marketing have expressed slight disappointment—who can blame &#8216;em? Here&#8217;s a short rundown on what Apple has to offer:
Pricing
Yes, Apple&#8217;s laptops (at least these two) feature a premium over similar PC counterparts. The MacBook starts at $1299. A similarly configured Dell XPS M1330—sans the DDR3 memory—is much cheaper, and can do more. Mobile broadband anyone? Forget what Apple says about configuring for standards that don&#8217;t exist yet. The Steve Jobs tax is very much [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog">The Gadget Blog</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src='http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/files/2008/10/new-macbooks.jpg' alt='new-macbooks.jpg' style='margin-left:0;' /></p>
<p>So Jobs has finally spilled the beans on their new MacBooks, turning the MacBook into a sort of MacBook Pro lite. Friends who&#8217;ve been brainwashed by Apple&#8217;s marketing have expressed slight disappointment—who can blame &#8216;em? Here&#8217;s a short rundown on what Apple has to offer:</p>
<h2>Pricing</h2>
<p>Yes, Apple&#8217;s laptops (at least these two) feature a premium over similar PC counterparts. The MacBook starts at $1299. A similarly configured Dell XPS M1330—sans the DDR3 memory—is much cheaper, and can do more. Mobile broadband anyone? Forget what Apple says about configuring for standards that don&#8217;t exist yet. The Steve Jobs tax is very much alive, especially since you have to pay a whopping $2000 (at least) for the Macbook Pro. <span id="more-2808"></span></p>
<h2>Performance</h2>
<p>Again, the key improvement of the new MacBooks are their use of DD3 memory. Basically, this means that the laptops&#8217; respective processors can maximize the RAM, since they&#8217;re now both running at the same speed (1066Mhz). What does this mean for the average user? Not much, but hardcore users should enjoy some noticeable gains for intensive tasks like video editing and high-end gaming.</p>
<p>Apple has finally given its consumer laptop (MacBook) some significant power in the graphics department. The MacBook Pro as always features dedicated graphics. But why couldn&#8217;t Apple put the same magnitude of power in a 13.3&#8243; frame? That would&#8217;ve been really new.</p>
<h2>Form Factor</h2>
<p>To make a long story short, both laptops are practically the same size as their predecessors. The differences are hardly noticeable to the naked eye, so let&#8217;s not spend more time here. To be fair though, every extra millimeter is important to portability freaks.</p>
<h2>Looks</h2>
<p>Obviously, the new MacBooks take a design cue from the current-generation iMacs. So there&#8217;s nothing revolutionary about how they look—Apple&#8217;s latest laptops still feature a distinctive and clean look that for some reason most PC manufacturers can&#8217;t compete with. It&#8217;s great that Apple decided to go with an all-aluminum main body, as it will prove more durable (and less prone to staining) than plastic.</p>
<p>To make a long story short, these new Apple laptops are mostly nothing new, with significant changes mainly limited to looks.</p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog">The Gadget Blog</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/with-apple-laptops-things-stay-the-same/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>