<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Gadget Blog &#187; digital cable</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/tag/digital-cable/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog</link>
	<description>Gadget News - Gadget Reviews - Gadget Tech Specs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 15:49:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Comcast Ups Rates: Bad Precedent?</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/comcast-ups-rates-bad-precedent/</link>
		<comments>http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/comcast-ups-rates-bad-precedent/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 14:37:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rico Mossesgeld</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital cable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rate hikes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[service providers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thegadgetblog.com/2008/10/08/comcast-ups-rates-bad-precedent/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday, Comcast increased its rates by 4.6 percent across the board, covering at the very least it&#8217;s digital cable and internet services:
The price hikes include $5.70 per month for the Digital Classic package, and $3.70 for standard cable service.
The increases are necessary because Comcast is hurt by the economy, too, spokesman Jeff Alexander said.
He cited gas prices, health care costs, increased programming costs, and improvements in the company&#8217;s technology and service.
As reader Carl noted when passing the news along, Comcast may have set a bad precedent for other service providers to follow. Can we expect companies to start charging higher [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog">The Gadget Blog</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src='http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/files/2008/10/210px-comcast_logosvg.png' alt='210px-comcast_logosvg.png' style='float:right;' />Yesterday, Comcast increased its rates <a href="http://www.pennlive.com/midstate/index.ssf/2008/10/comcast_announces_rate_hikes.html">by 4.6 percent across the board</a>, covering at the very least it&#8217;s digital cable and internet services:</p>
<blockquote><p>The price hikes include $5.70 per month for the Digital Classic package, and $3.70 for standard cable service.</p>
<p>The increases are necessary because Comcast is hurt by the economy, too, spokesman Jeff Alexander said.</p>
<p>He cited gas prices, health care costs, increased programming costs, and improvements in the company&#8217;s technology and service.</p></blockquote>
<p>As reader <a href="http://inaneramble.blogspot.com/">Carl</a> noted when passing the news along, Comcast may have set a bad precedent for other service providers to follow. Can we expect companies to start charging higher monthly fees, and point the finger at the poorly performing economy?</p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog">The Gadget Blog</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/comcast-ups-rates-bad-precedent/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>