<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Gadget Blog &#187; F-35</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/tag/f-35/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog</link>
	<description>Gadget News - Gadget Reviews - Gadget Tech Specs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 19:28:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Pratt &amp; Whitney 135: The Most Powerful Fighter Engine Ever Built</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/pratt-whitney-135-the-most-powerful-fighter-engine-ever-built/</link>
		<comments>http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/pratt-whitney-135-the-most-powerful-fighter-engine-ever-built/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 11:30:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rico Mossesgeld</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Transportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[135]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35 Lightning II]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pratt & Whitney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pratt & Whitney 135]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/?p=5030</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The F-35 Lightning II looks really awesome, especially in VTOL/hover mode, but I really don&#8217;t understand why the US Air Force considers a super-heavy 70,000-pound as the future. Then again, all that high-tech crammed into the F-35 promises to make maneuvering irrelevant for future dogfights, and at least one variant of the fighter&#8217;s claimed maneuverability is second only to F-22 Raptor (just in case).
In any case, Lockheed Martin&#8217;s insistence to develop the fifth generation fighter with that kind of weight forced them to develop the most powerful fighter engine ever built, the Pratt &#38; Whitney 135:
Featuring a maximum of 42,000 [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog">The Gadget Blog</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/tag/f-35/">F-35 Lightning II</a> looks really awesome, especially in VTOL/hover mode, but I really don&#8217;t understand why the US Air Force considers a super-heavy 70,000-pound as the future. Then again, all that high-tech crammed into the F-35 promises <a href="http://www.military.com/features/0,15240,186349,00.html">to make maneuvering irrelevant for future dogfights</a>, and at least one variant of the fighter&#8217;s claimed maneuverability is second only to F-22 Raptor (just in case).</p>
<p>In any case, Lockheed Martin&#8217;s insistence to develop the fifth generation fighter with that kind of weight forced them to develop the most powerful fighter engine ever built, the Pratt &amp; Whitney 135:</p>
<div id="attachment_5031" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 510px"><img class="size-full wp-image-5031" src="http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/files/2009/07/najn8jtz6qjaalvuyipfvftjo1_500.jpg" alt="Courtesy x planes" width="500" height="358" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Courtesy x planes</p></div>
<p>Featuring a maximum of 42,000 pounds of force under full afterburner, I wonder how quickly the Pratt &amp; Whitney 135 can cook marshmallows. I also wonder how the super-powerful and super-awesome F-35 will be relevant for future, unconventional, warfare. By that time, <em>everyone</em> will be smart enough not to confront first-world countries with their powerful conventional armies head on.</p>
<p><a href="http://xplanes.tumblr.com/post/152415994/the-pratt-whitney-f135-the-most-powerful">Source</a></p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog">The Gadget Blog</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/pratt-whitney-135-the-most-powerful-fighter-engine-ever-built/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hackers Learn More About F-35 Lightning II</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/hackers-learn-more-about-f-35-lightning-ii/</link>
		<comments>http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/hackers-learn-more-about-f-35-lightning-ii/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 12:55:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rico Mossesgeld</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Transportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35 Lighting II]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joint Strike Fighter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JSF project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[X-35]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/?p=4094</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So you and your allies have spent $300 billion to develop what&#8217;s hopefully the most kick-ass fighter plane ever (F-22 Raptor, eat your heart out). And by now the whole world knows about the F-35 Lighting II, the star of your Joint Strike Fighter project. Wouldn&#8217;t you try your best to secure all that detailed research &#38; development data from the prying eyes of spies?

To their credit, the US government kept the most sensitive data off the internet. But recently, &#8220;computer spies&#8221; were able to acquire data on the design and electronics of the F-35. In the words of Reuters, [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog">The Gadget Blog</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So you and your allies have spent $300 billion to develop what&#8217;s hopefully the most kick-ass fighter plane ever (F-22 Raptor, eat your heart out). And by now the whole world knows about the F-35 Lighting II, the star of your Joint Strike Fighter project. Wouldn&#8217;t you try your best to secure all that detailed research &amp; development data from the prying eyes of spies?</p>
<p><a rel="attachment wp-att-4095" href="http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/hackers-learn-more-about-f-35-lightning-ii/f-35/"><img class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-4095" src="http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/files/2009/04/f-35-590x224.jpg" alt="f-35" width="590" height="224" /></a><span id="more-4094"></span></p>
<p>To their credit, the US government kept the most sensitive data off the internet. But recently, &#8220;computer spies&#8221; were able to acquire data on the design and electronics of the F-35. In the words of <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/technologyNews/idUSTRE53K0TG20090421?feedType=RSS&amp;feedName=technologyNews">Reuters</a>, &#8220;making it potentially easier to defend against the plane.&#8221;</p>
<p>Oh well, just watch this &#8220;uplifting&#8221; video of the F-35 testing its hover capability, while it was still competing for the Joint Strike Fighter Project. The F-35 will come in three flavors: one that takes of normally, another that can take off vertically (the capability show here), and yet another designed for aircraft carriers.</p>
<div class="vidembedwrap"><object width="590" height="442"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/2HcFrlUcMHU&ap=%2526fmt%3D18"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/2HcFrlUcMHU&ap=%2526fmt%3D18" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="590" height="442"></embed></object></div>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog">The Gadget Blog</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/hackers-learn-more-about-f-35-lightning-ii/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>