<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Gadget Blog &#187; Google</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/tag/google/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog</link>
	<description>Gadget News - Gadget Reviews - Gadget Tech Specs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 11:20:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Create Your Own goo.gl URLs</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/shorten-urls-with-goo-gl/</link>
		<comments>http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/shorten-urls-with-goo-gl/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 06:50:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rico Mossesgeld</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[goo.gl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shortner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[URL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[URL shortener]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[URL shortening]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/shorten-urls-with-goo-gl/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The home page of goo.gl, Google&#8217;s new URL shortening service, claims that it&#8217;s &#8220;not for broader consumer use&#8221;. But thanks to Alexandre Gaigalas, who created a third-party goo.gl URL shortener, that&#8217;s not true.
Visit http://gaigalas.net/lab/googl, type in any URL and press &#8220;Shorten&#8221; to get your very own goo.gl URL!

Thanks for the tip Andry!
Post from: The Gadget Blog
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog">The Gadget Blog</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The home page of <a href="http://goo.gl/">goo.gl</a>, Google&#8217;s new URL shortening service, claims that it&#8217;s &#8220;not for broader consumer use&#8221;. But thanks to Alexandre Gaigalas, who created a third-party goo.gl URL shortener, that&#8217;s not true.</p>
<p>Visit <a href="http://gaigalas.net/lab/googl">http://gaigalas.net/lab/googl</a>, type in any URL and press &#8220;Shorten&#8221; to get your very own goo.gl URL!</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter" src="http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/files/2009/12/googl-shortener.png" alt="" /></p>
<p>Thanks for the tip Andry!</p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog">The Gadget Blog</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/shorten-urls-with-goo-gl/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Phone Pricing &amp; Availability Rumors</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/google-phone-pricing-availability-rumors/</link>
		<comments>http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/google-phone-pricing-availability-rumors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 15:06:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rico Mossesgeld</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cellphones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android OS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dream]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Phone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HTC Passion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nexus One]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/google-phone-pricing-availability-rumors/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just in case you missed them, two rumors about the upcoming Google Phone (AKA the Nexus One, Dream, or the HTC Passion). From Android Guys:
Here’s the price: $199 unlocked in stores. $100 rebate online if you have an active and old Google account. That $100 rebate is either to buy it $99 online from Google’s online phone store, for using on Android Marketplace or for using on any Google Checkout stores. Can also be used for T-Mobile or AT&#38;T pre-paid Data SIM card service at $29 per month, no contracts required.
From Reuters:
The phone, manufactured by HTC, has a number of [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog">The Gadget Blog</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just in case you missed them, two rumors about the upcoming Google Phone (AKA the Nexus One, Dream, or the HTC Passion). From <a href="http://www.androidguys.com/2009/12/14/reuters-nexus-one-available-directly-through-google-website-january-5/">Android Guys</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Here’s the price: $199 unlocked in stores. $100 rebate online if you have an active and old Google account. That $100 rebate is either to buy it $99 online from Google’s online phone store, for using on Android Marketplace or for using on any Google Checkout stores. Can also be used for T-Mobile or AT&amp;T pre-paid Data SIM card service at $29 per month, no contracts required.</p></blockquote>
<p>From Reuters:</p>
<blockquote><p>The phone, manufactured by HTC, has a number of code names such as HTC Passion, Dream or Nexus One and could be available directly though the Google website as early as January 5, according to the source.</p></blockquote>
<p><img class="alignright" src="http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/files/2009/12/google-phone-nexus-one-htc-passion-dream.jpg" alt="" width="255" />Nothing&#8217;s definite yet. Until we actually see an official announcement from an official Google rep, I won&#8217;t bother adding to the rumor pool. What&#8217;s clear though is that this development will potentially leave other manufacturers and operators who&#8217;ve jumped on the Android OS bandwagon out in the cold. If the $199 unlocked price tag is true, why would you bother locking yourself to a two-year contract then?</p>
<p>I just hope that Google plans to make the Nexus One available <em>worldwide</em>. If they&#8217;re really pushing a mobile free from the restrictions of traditional service provider plans or lock-ins, I&#8217;d like to see the geography barrier fall as well.</p>
<p>What do you think? Do the rumors above hold any truth? I&#8217;m pretty loaded gadget-wise, and won&#8217;t spend in that regard for Christmas anyway, so it&#8217;s a wait-and-see game for me.</p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog">The Gadget Blog</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/google-phone-pricing-availability-rumors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mozilla Exec: Use Bing, not Google</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/mozilla-exec-use-bing-not-google/</link>
		<comments>http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/mozilla-exec-use-bing-not-google/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 12:27:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rico Mossesgeld</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[browsers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mozilla]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engines]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/?p=6153</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The whole &#8220;If you have something that you don&#8217;t want anyone to know, maybe you shouldn&#8217;t be doing it in the first place&#8221; speech by Google CEO Eric Schmidt continues to have effects. Most recently it pushed Mozilla executive Asa Dotzler to tell Firefox users to ditch Google for Bing, praising the latter for having &#8220;a better privacy policy&#8221;.

This is big, because Mozilla and Google have had a historically strong relationship. Google has been the default search engine on Mozilla&#8217;s Firefox for many years now, and the browser has enjoyed exposure via Google&#8217;s push to attract converters from Internet Explorer—at [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog">The Gadget Blog</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The whole &#8220;If you have something that you don&#8217;t want anyone to know, maybe you shouldn&#8217;t be doing it in the first place&#8221; <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A6e7wfDHzew">speech</a> by Google CEO Eric Schmidt continues to have effects. Most recently it pushed Mozilla executive Asa Dotzler to tell Firefox users to <a href="http://arstechnica.com/microsoft/news/2009/12/mozilla-exec-urges-firefox-users-ditch-google-for-bing.ars">ditch Google for Bing</a>, praising the latter for having &#8220;a better privacy policy&#8221;.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/files/2009/12/Bing-Add-On-Firefox.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-6154" src="http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/files/2009/12/Bing-Add-On-Firefox.png" alt="Bing-Add-On-Firefox" width="445" height="207" /></a></p>
<p>This is big, because Mozilla and Google have had a historically strong relationship. Google has been the default search engine on Mozilla&#8217;s Firefox for many years now, and the browser has enjoyed exposure via Google&#8217;s push to attract converters from Internet Explorer—at least right until something called Chrome came around. In fact, the<a href="http://arstechnica.com/open-source/news/2009/11/mozilla-reports-786-million-in-revenue-for-2008.ars"> majority of Mozilla&#8217;s income for last year</a> (around 97%) came from payments from Google and other big websites to be included into Firefox&#8217;s search engines by default.</p>
<p>In any case, what do you think of Schmidt&#8217;s &#8220;admission&#8221;? Personally, you can never fault a CEO for being honest, especially when he&#8217;s professed a willingness to follow the laws of the countries he operates in—like the Patriot Act in the US.</p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog">The Gadget Blog</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/mozilla-exec-use-bing-not-google/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dead Guy Found on Google Street View</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/dead-guy-found-on-google-street-view/</link>
		<comments>http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/dead-guy-found-on-google-street-view/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 15:27:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rico Mossesgeld</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Earth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Earth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Maps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Street View]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Street View]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/dead-guy-found-on-google-street-view/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is this for real? Take a quick look through Google Street View at the corner of 29th street and Park Avenue South in New York City. You&#8217;ll see what seems to be a dead guy sprawled on the road, with several individuals looking on. A woman has her hands pressed to her cheeks, expressing shock.

This snapshot of the busy New York intersection has been accessible through Street View feature for quite some time now. From the first sighting to the publication of this post, more than 11 hours have passed. I&#8217;ve sent a complaint to Google; let&#8217;s see if they [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog">The Gadget Blog</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this for real? Take a quick look through <a href="http://everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/tag/google/">Google</a> Street View at the <a href="http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&amp;source=s_q&amp;hl=en&amp;geocode=&amp;q=29th+st+and+park+ave&amp;sll=40.743973,-73.983704&amp;sspn=0.007503,0.007381&amp;g=29th+st+and+park+ave,+se+corner&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;hq=&amp;hnear=Park+Ave+S+%26+E+29th+St,+New+York,+10016&amp;ll=40.743903,-73.983772&amp;spn=0.000707,0.001717&amp;t=h&amp;z=20&amp;iwloc=A&amp;layer=c&amp;cbll=40.743948,-73.983676&amp;panoid=Wr6HGYMILQiv3urRAq2n3Q&amp;cbp=12,2.53,,0,20.96">corner of 29th street and Park Avenue South in New York City</a>. You&#8217;ll see what seems to be a dead guy sprawled on the road, with several individuals looking on. A woman has her hands pressed to her cheeks, expressing shock.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/files/2009/12/dead-guy-on-google-maps.jpg"><img src="http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/files/2009/12/dead-guy-on-google-maps.jpg" width="590" class="aligncenter" /></a></p>
<p>This snapshot of the busy New York intersection has been accessible through Street View feature for quite some time now. From the first sighting to the publication of this post, more than 11 hours have passed. I&#8217;ve sent a complaint to Google; let&#8217;s see if they act on this potentially disturbing scene immediately, if at all.</p>
<p>On a side note, I&#8217;m now convinced that the faces of people captured by <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Streetview#Cameras">Street View&#8217;s cameras</a> are automatically blurred out. The sheer manpower required to blur out faces manually notwithstanding, I&#8217;d imagine anyone working for Google seeing a dead guy would keep him from appearing, right?</p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog">The Gadget Blog</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/dead-guy-found-on-google-street-view/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Flipswap Wants You to Ditch Your iPhone</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/flipswap-wants-you-to-ditch-your-iphone/</link>
		<comments>http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/flipswap-wants-you-to-ditch-your-iphone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 04:03:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rico Mossesgeld</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Deals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android OS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DROID]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flipswap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motorola]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/?p=5867</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For some reason I keep on forgetting to post the following message, which of course came straight from Flipswap&#8217;s marketing peeps:

Flipswap will give anyone as much as $350 for their iPhone plus a guaranteed $25 bonus with Droid proof of purchase. By taking advantage of this third party promotion, your readers will not only be the first of their friends with the latest gadget – but they’ll still have enough left over to buy out their current smart phone contract or pick up a Droid Multimedia Station.
The specifics are simple: Trade in your iPhone by November 30th and use promo [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog">The Gadget Blog</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For some reason I keep on forgetting to post the following message, which of course came straight from <a href="http://flipswap.com">Flipswap</a>&#8217;s marketing peeps:<br />
<img src="http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/files/2009/11/B2C_DROID_Size.jpg" alt="B2C_DROID_Size" width="228" height="283" class="alignright size-full wp-image-5868" /><br />
<blockquote>Flipswap will give anyone as much as $350 for their iPhone plus a guaranteed $25 bonus with Droid proof of purchase. By taking advantage of this third party promotion, your readers will not only be the first of their friends with the latest gadget – but they’ll still have enough left over to buy out their current smart phone contract or pick up a Droid Multimedia Station.</p>
<p>The specifics are simple: Trade in your iPhone by November 30th and use promo code “getdroid” at checkout to receive a $25 bonus credit. Include a copy of your DROID purchase receipt with your traded phone as proof of purchase to receive the bonus. You can visit www.flipswap.com/DROID to check it out.</p></blockquote>
<p>Whoever came up with this idea is taking quite a risk, and most likely hoping the Motorola DROID is making a splash as enjoys distribution in the US courtesy Verizon Wireless.</p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog">The Gadget Blog</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/flipswap-wants-you-to-ditch-your-iphone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conclusion from Google: Memory Chips More Unreliable Than Previously Believed</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/conclusion-from-google-memory-chips-more-unreliable-than-previously-believed/</link>
		<comments>http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/conclusion-from-google-memory-chips-more-unreliable-than-previously-believed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 11:30:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rico Mossesgeld</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[failure rates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[memory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[memory chips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RAM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/?p=5547</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Over the last two-and-a-half years, search engine giant Google analyzed the performance of the thousands of computers it uses for its own data centers. The surprising trend? Based on real-world data, Google concluded that the error rates of memory chips are higher than previously believed. Much much higher:
How many errors? On average, about one in three Google servers experienced a correctable memory error each year and one in a hundred an uncorrectable error, an event that typically causes a crash.
Older research showed that, for every 1 billion hours, a memory chip would fail on average around 200 to 5,000 times. [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog">The Gadget Blog</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over the last two-and-a-half years, search engine giant <a href="http://everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/tag/google/">Google</a> analyzed the performance of the thousands of computers it uses for its own data centers. The surprising trend? Based on real-world data, Google concluded that the error rates of memory chips are higher than previously believed. Much much higher:</p>
<blockquote><p>How many errors? On average, about one in three Google servers experienced a correctable memory error each year and one in a hundred an uncorrectable error, an event that typically causes a crash.</p></blockquote>
<p><a rel="attachment wp-att-5552" href="http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/conclusion-from-google-memory-chips-more-unreliable-than-previously-believed/google-circuit-thingy/"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-5552" src="http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/files/2009/10/google-circuit-thingy-300x225.jpg" alt="google-circuit-thingy" width="300" height="225" /></a>Older research showed that, for every 1 billion hours, a memory chip would fail on average around 200 to 5,000 times. Google&#8217;s project revealed a much higher ratio: 25,000 to 75,000 failures within the same time period.</p>
<p>To be clear, those numbers aren&#8217;t anything significant for the typical consumer. A billion hours is equal to more than 100,000 years after all, worth at least ten thousand lifetimes. Nevertheless, Google&#8217;s research should be useful for projects or businesses that have to rely on lots of memory chips to get the job. A prominent example is of course other companies that maintain their own data centers.</p>
<p>Of course Google couldn&#8217;t pass up the opportunity to market its own technical expertise, discussing the various technologies it uses to protect end-users from crashes caused by memory errors. Apparently &#8220;error correction code&#8221; and &#8220;chipkill&#8221; are just two of the things Google relies on to protect you from the <em>evil</em> data corruption. (<a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-30685_3-10370026-264.html?tag=newsLeadStoriesArea.1">Source</a>, thanks to <a href="http://wigwam.tumblr.com">Sheree</a> for the pic!)</p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog">The Gadget Blog</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/conclusion-from-google-memory-chips-more-unreliable-than-previously-believed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Wave First Impressions</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/google-wave-first-impressions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/google-wave-first-impressions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 15:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rico Mossesgeld</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Impressions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Wave]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wave]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/?p=5460</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The short version: Google Wave is your traditional forum on steroids, with the ability to add extensions to change the way you share stuff with other people. As you&#8217;ve probably seen screenshots of Google Wave, I hope the first impressions I share below carry some sense of novelty. Feel free to skip the first section if you&#8217;re already familiar with Google Wave.
What is Google Wave?
The layout of Google Wave is similar to Gmail, with the addition of a third column on the right to display the contents of whatever wave is selected on the middle column, and it&#8217;s possible to [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog">The Gadget Blog</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The short version: Google Wave is your traditional forum on steroids, with the ability to add extensions to change the way you share stuff with other people. As you&#8217;ve probably seen screenshots of Google Wave, I hope the first impressions I share below carry some sense of novelty. Feel free to skip the first section if you&#8217;re already familiar with Google Wave.</p>

<a href='http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/google-wave-first-impressions/wave3/' title='wave3'><img width="70" height="70" src="http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/files/2009/10/wave3-70x70.png" class="attachment-thumbnail" alt="" title="wave3" /></a>
<a href='http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/google-wave-first-impressions/wave1/' title='wave1'><img width="70" height="70" src="http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/files/2009/10/wave1-70x70.png" class="attachment-thumbnail" alt="" title="wave1" /></a>
<a href='http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/google-wave-first-impressions/wave2/' title='wave2'><img width="70" height="70" src="http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/files/2009/10/wave2-70x70.png" class="attachment-thumbnail" alt="" title="wave2" /></a>

<h2>What is Google Wave?</h2>
<p>The layout of Google Wave is similar to Gmail, with the addition of a third column on the right to display the contents of whatever wave is selected on the middle column, and it&#8217;s possible to drag-resize each column. Think of each wave as a conversation of sorts, but with the ability to add not only words, but pictures, videos, and other sorts of media to the virtual discussion. Users can even choose to frame the conversation in different ways, examples being running a collaborative Sudoku game, or setting up Yes-No-Maybe waves. There&#8217;s even the playback feature, which re-enacts the Wave as it happened, much like watching a recorded conversation unfold.</p>
<p>Additions to a &#8220;normal&#8221; kind of conversation are organized as threads, with replies visually tied to the whatever they&#8217;re replying to through the use of indentation. Everything happens in real-time, and it&#8217;s honestly a bit cool and scary at the same time, seeing replies to each other appearing as they&#8217;re typed. It&#8217;s more real-time than chat, and forces people to think before they tap a single key. The interface as mostly responsive, though I did notice slight slowdowns as I typed replies to my one and only Wave contact (more on that later). With a future userbase most likely in the hundreds of millions, let&#8217;s hope Google has a scalable plan to update what could be millions of waves concurrently.</p>
<h2>First Impressions</h2>
<p>So Google Wave claims to be all for communication and collaboration. How well does it do either? The real-time nature of a Wave definitely helps keep people connected. As I&#8217;ve written above, Wave is even more real-time than chat! The snappy interface updates itself constantly, keeping the user on top of any new developments. And while the contents of each Wave are listed completely for everyone involved to see, the Playback feature adds a new dimension to recall. Re-enacting the Wave as it happened makes it easier to place all developments within the proper context, and the Spacebar is a useful shortcut for those who like to skim through the time frame quickly.</p>
<p>Collaborative-wise however, it&#8217;s clear that the relatively little number of Wave users is a limitation. Having received my Wave account mere hours ago, I only have two contacts on my list: the person who invited me, and someone I invited. Currently I can only collaborate with those two, unless either contact adds me to a Wave with numerous participants, or I add users I encounter on existing waves to my contact list.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s also a bit time-consuming to follow lengthy Waves, at least those of the &#8220;normal&#8221; word-only kind, despite the Playback feature. I&#8217;m eager to try out numerous extensions that promise to add to the functionality of my future waves—these extensions basically change the way you and your contacts collaborate with each other—but for now I&#8217;ll wait until my invites are processed and I have more people on my contact list. Let&#8217;s crack the whip on getting those invites out, Google!</p>
<h2>Share Your Invites Here</h2>
<p>I&#8217;ve already used up all 8 of my invites to Google Wave, but if you&#8217;re looking for one, or are eager to share one, feel free to coordinate by leaving comments below. Please do not post emails verbatim (<em>me@whatever.com</em>). To protect yourself from spammers, use &#8220;[at]&#8221; and &#8220;[dot]&#8221; or something similar (<em>me [at] whatever [dot] com). You are also free to share your thoughts on Google Wave as comments below.</em></p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog">The Gadget Blog</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/google-wave-first-impressions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Root Access to Android OS Easy as One Click</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/root-access-to-android-os-easy-as-one-click/</link>
		<comments>http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/root-access-to-android-os-easy-as-one-click/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 10:47:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rico Mossesgeld</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cellphones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[G1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HTC Dream]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[T-Mobile]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/?p=5196</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So it&#8217;s reported that, that full access to an Android OS device is as easy as downloading a 4MB app called FlashRec and executing it. The app basically replaces the devices recovery ROM with a less restrictive one, so completing the process requires asking the device to do recovery. The user-friendly aspect? This hack is kind enough to allow backups of whatever it overwrites, so returning the whole setup to &#8220;pristine&#8221; condition is possible.
hat&#8217;s the point of &#8220;rooting&#8221; the Android OS? It pretty much opens up the device to any modified Android OS of a user&#8217;s choosing, allowing customization on [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog">The Gadget Blog</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So it&#8217;s reported that, that full access to an Android OS device is as easy as downloading a 4MB app called FlashRec and executing it. The app basically replaces the devices recovery ROM with a less restrictive one, so completing the process requires asking the device to do recovery. The user-friendly aspect? This hack is kind enough to allow backups of whatever it overwrites, so returning the whole setup to &#8220;pristine&#8221; condition is possible.</p>
<p><div id="attachment_5198" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 210px"><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/root-access-to-android-os-easy-as-one-click/cmrecovery14/" rel="attachment wp-att-5198"><img src="http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/files/2009/08/cmrecovery14-200x300.png" alt="Courtesy Source" width="200" height="300" class="size-medium wp-image-5198" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Courtesy Source</p></div>What&#8217;s the point of &#8220;rooting&#8221; the Android OS? It pretty much opens up the device to any modified Android OS of a user&#8217;s choosing, allowing customization on a very low-level.</p>
<p>What are the implications? Well, I don&#8217;t think we&#8217;ll hear Google complaining. The Android OS is the company&#8217;s attempt to make its mobile presence more significant, and Google is traditionally about letting people do what they want with what they have (<a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/apple-blocks-google-voice-app/">Google Voice vs. Apple</a>, anyone?).</p>
<p>We will hear complaints from T-Mobile, as this hack potentially gives them less control over its subscribers, if any will remain at all. This will probably lead to other operators to rethink any plans to subsidize Android OS devices, as US operators love dictating what their customers can and can&#8217;t do.</p>
<p>In any case, click on the source for full instructions on rooting your Android device—and what precautions to take. A video summarizing that is below:</p>
<div class="vidembedwrap"><object width="590" height="442"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/cfskzfjOMgc&ap=%2526fmt%3D18"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/cfskzfjOMgc&ap=%2526fmt%3D18" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="590" height="442"></embed></object></div>
<p><a href="http://androidandme.com/2009/08/news/how-to-root-a-t-mobile-g1-and-mytouch-3g-android-phone/">Source</a></p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog">The Gadget Blog</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/root-access-to-android-os-easy-as-one-click/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rumored Dell Benzine Android Smartphone Specs</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/rumored-dell-benzine-android-smartphone-specs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/rumored-dell-benzine-android-smartphone-specs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 13:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rico Mossesgeld</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cellphones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benzine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[specs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/?p=5166</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to the source, here are the specs you should expect from Dell&#8217;s rumored Android smartphone, the so-called &#8220;Benzine&#8221; which is rumored as ready for launch:

Quad-band GSM/GPRS/EDGE class 12
Size: 68.6cc
103g grams weight
Dimensions: 58 x 122 x 11.7mm
Display: 3.5″ nHD 640×360 LCD, 18-bit, 262K colors
OTA capable
Microsoft Exchange support
Google, AIM, Yahoo and MSN IM support
3 megapixel auto-focus, flash, 8x digital zoom camera with 30fps video shooting mode, built in photo editor
USB 2.0, Bluetooth 2.0 + EDR
A-GPS
On-screen QWERTY keyboard, hardwriting recognition, multi touch UI
MicroSD slot

Pretty thin and full-featured, if you ask me. And unless the version of Android to run on this gadget [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog">The Gadget Blog</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to the source, here are the specs you should expect from Dell&#8217;s rumored Android smartphone, the so-called &#8220;Benzine&#8221; which is rumored as ready for launch:</p>
<div id="attachment_5165" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 534px"><img class="size-full wp-image-5165" src="http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/files/2009/08/dellsmartphone.jpg" alt="Courtesy Boy Genius Report" width="524" height="382" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Courtesy Boy Genius Report</p></div>
<ul>
<li>Quad-band GSM/GPRS/EDGE class 12</li>
<li>Size: 68.6cc</li>
<li>103g grams weight</li>
<li>Dimensions: 58 x 122 x 11.7mm</li>
<li>Display: 3.5″ nHD 640×360 LCD, 18-bit, 262K colors</li>
<li>OTA capable</li>
<li>Microsoft Exchange support</li>
<li>Google, AIM, Yahoo and MSN IM support</li>
<li>3 megapixel auto-focus, flash, 8x digital zoom camera with 30fps video shooting mode, built in photo editor</li>
<li>USB 2.0, Bluetooth 2.0 + EDR</li>
<li>A-GPS</li>
<li>On-screen QWERTY keyboard, hardwriting recognition, multi touch UI</li>
<li>MicroSD slot</li>
</ul>
<p>Pretty thin and full-featured, if you ask me. And unless the version of Android to run on this gadget was changed significantly, future buyers should expect <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/htc-magic-pics-and-first-impressions/">a responsive experience</a>.</p>
<p>Given the intentionally blurriness of the product pic, I&#8217;m calling this an intentional leak. In any case, updates as they become official to follow.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.boygeniusreport.com/2009/08/13/dells-smartphone-pictured-again-specd-other-android-details/">Source</a></p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog">The Gadget Blog</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/rumored-dell-benzine-android-smartphone-specs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chrome OS = Diapers for MS and Apple</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/chrome-os-diapers-for-ms-and-apple/</link>
		<comments>http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/chrome-os-diapers-for-ms-and-apple/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 13:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rico Mossesgeld</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[netbooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrome OS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OS X]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/?p=4852</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[True or false?
Post from: The Gadget Blog
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog">The Gadget Blog</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_4853" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 517px"><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/chrome-os-diapers-for-ms-and-apple/windows-os-x-chrome-os-poop/" rel="attachment wp-att-4853"><img src="http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/files/2009/07/windows-os-x-chrome-os-poop.jpg" alt="Courtesy Joy of Tech" width="507" height="722" class="size-full wp-image-4853" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Courtesy Joy of Tech</p></div>
<p>True or false?</p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog">The Gadget Blog</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/chrome-os-diapers-for-ms-and-apple/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>