<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Gadget Blog &#187; performance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/tag/performance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog</link>
	<description>Gadget News - Gadget Reviews - Gadget Tech Specs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 12:30:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Conversations: Performance of the New MacBooks</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/conversations-performance-of-the-new-macbooks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/conversations-performance-of-the-new-macbooks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 14:58:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rico Mossesgeld</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Laptops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ramblings of a Gadget Geek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MacBook Pro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[performance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thegadgetblog.com/2008/10/17/conversations-performance-of-the-new-macbooks/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I mostly kept quiet last night while I chatted with Marco, the site guy, about just how much more powerful the new MacBooks are compared to their predecessors.
Marco: http://www.primatelabs.ca/blog/2008/10/macbook-and-macbook-pro-performance-october-2008/
Marco: not too much performance boost
Marco: even with ddr3
Rico: Lol, only the basic model has an appreciable boost
Marco: yeah
Marco: i told you
Marco: macbooks benefited more
Marco: benefited
Rico: especially with the discrete (but not dedicated) graphics
Marco: yeah
Marco: but it is cheaper
Marco: my probable advice would be 
Marco: if you&#8217;re upgrading from a 3 year old laptop
Marco: its worth it
Marco: but if like me
Rico: hahaha, agreed
Marco: someone who just has bought an mbp
Marco: not really [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog">The Gadget Blog</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I mostly kept quiet last night while I chatted with Marco, <a href="http://site-guy.com">the site guy</a>, about just how much more powerful <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/2008/10/15/with-apple-laptops-things-stay-the-same/">the new MacBooks</a> are compared to their predecessors.</p>
<p><span style="font-size:smaller;"><strong>Marco:</strong> http://www.primatelabs.ca/blog/2008/10/macbook-and-macbook-pro-performance-october-2008/<br />
<strong>Marco:</strong> not too much performance boost<br />
<strong>Marco:</strong> even with ddr3<br />
<strong>Rico:</strong> Lol, only the basic model has an appreciable boost<br />
<strong>Marco:</strong> yeah<br />
<strong>Marco:</strong> i told you<br />
<strong>Marco:</strong> macbooks benefited more<br />
<strong>Marco:</strong> benefited<br />
<strong>Rico:</strong> especially with the discrete (but not dedicated) graphics<br />
<strong>Marco:</strong> yeah<br />
<strong>Marco:</strong> but it is cheaper<br />
<strong>Marco:</strong> my probable advice would be <span id="more-2816"></span><br />
<strong>Marco:</strong> if you&#8217;re upgrading from a 3 year old laptop<br />
<strong>Marco:</strong> its worth it<br />
<strong>Marco:</strong> but if like me<br />
<strong>Rico:</strong> hahaha, agreed<br />
<strong>Marco:</strong> someone who just has bought an mbp<br />
<strong>Marco:</strong> not really worth it<br />
<strong>Marco:</strong> unless you have cash to burn<br />
<strong>Marco:</strong> the lack of performance gains could also be in the drivers<br />
<strong>Marco:</strong> remember apple writes their own chipset drivers<br />
<strong>Marco:</strong> and this is the first time they&#8217;re writing for nvidia based chipsets<br />
<strong>Marco:</strong> but regardless the gains are still negligible<br />
<strong>Rico:</strong> So this could probably improve over time?<br />
<strong>Rico:</strong> With updates and the like?<br />
<strong>Marco:</strong> it is possible<br />
<strong>Marco:</strong> but how much gain<br />
<strong>Marco:</strong> is still probably minute<br />
<strong>Marco:</strong> but the platform opens up very exciting possibilities when intel releases their nehalem family chips<br />
<strong>Marco:</strong> which offer mobile quadcore<br />
<strong>Marco:</strong> that with nvidia&#8217;s 9400m chipset could really usher in some amazingly fast notebooks by the start of next year<br />
<strong>Marco:</strong> probably in june at macworld<br />
<strong>Marco:</strong> future proofing has always been the forte of apple anyway<br />
<strong>Rico:</strong> nehalem?<br />
<strong>Marco:</strong> the next family of multicore processors<br />
<strong>Marco:</strong> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_Nehalem_(microarchitecture)<br />
<strong>Marco:</strong> right now it&#8217;s penryn<br />
<strong>Marco:</strong><br />
<strong>Marco:</strong> its also cool to note that apple thinks (well implied) that bluray will die soon.<br />
<strong>Marco:</strong> i think bluray hasnt enjoyed the ubiquitous popularity of dvd<br />
<strong>Marco:</strong> when dvd became standard<br />
<strong>Marco:</strong> infact bluray sales are down this year<br />
<strong>Rico:</strong> Ah, you mean all that talk about licensing complications keeping Apple from integrating Blu-Ray in the MacBook?<br />
<strong>Marco:</strong> because people prefer to get their hd content online<br />
<strong>Marco:</strong> lol<br />
<strong>Marco:</strong> yeah its not licensing complications really<br />
<strong>Marco:</strong> well that&#8217;s probably part of it<br />
<strong>Marco:</strong> but i think its more of not adapting something that is close to extinction anyway<br />
<strong>Marco:</strong> its cheaper to get your hd content via itunes<br />
<strong>Marco:</strong> or hulu<br />
<strong>Marco:</strong> than it is to buy a bluray disc<br />
<strong>Marco:</strong> let alone a bluray capable burner<br />
<strong>Marco:</strong> er<br />
<strong>Marco:</strong> player<br />
<strong>Marco:</strong> so i think apple believes that hd content&#8217;s future is through online distribution<br />
<strong>Marco:</strong> rather than through physical media<br />
<strong>Marco:</strong> like bluray<br />
<strong>Marco:</strong> but of course they cant really say that<br />
<strong>Marco:</strong> and that&#8217;s beside their official issues with licensing<br />
<strong>Rico:</strong> I know I know, it&#8217;s Apple&#8217;s marketing magic at work again<br />
<strong>Marco:</strong> hahah true</span></p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog">The Gadget Blog</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/conversations-performance-of-the-new-macbooks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>