<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Gadget Blog &#187; reliability</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/tag/reliability/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog</link>
	<description>Gadget News - Gadget Reviews - Gadget Tech Specs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 07:30:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Asus Tops Laptop Reliability Study</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/asus-tops-laptop-reliability-study/</link>
		<comments>http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/asus-tops-laptop-reliability-study/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 14:00:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rico Mossesgeld</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Laptops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[netbooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Acer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASUS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gateway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lenovo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reliability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[survey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toshiba]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/?p=5942</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to research by warranty firm SquareTrade, you really get what you pay for, with premium-priced laptops lasting longer than their cheaper counterparts on average. Good news for those who&#8217;ve spent money for specs, bad for buyers trying to eke by on affordable netbooks; from the survey of 30,000 portables, netbooks have a 5.8% chance of failing within the first year.


Another notable trend becomes clear when comparing brands. Here&#8217;s the list of nine different brands, ranked from most reliable to least, in terms of malfunction rate:


Asus
Toshiba
Sony
Apple
Dell
Lenovo
Acer
Gateway
HP

Looks like Asus&#8216; marketing department have a new talking point to advertise, while Apple has [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog">The Gadget Blog</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to research by warranty firm <a href="http://www.squaretrade.com/pages/laptop-reliability-1109/">SquareTrade</a>, you really get what you pay for, with premium-priced laptops lasting longer than their cheaper counterparts on average. Good news for those who&#8217;ve spent money for specs, bad for buyers trying to eke by on affordable netbooks; from the survey of 30,000 portables, netbooks have a 5.8% chance of failing within the first year.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/files/2009/11/netbook-laptop-premium-reliability-2.PNG" alt="netbook-laptop-premium-reliability-2" width="546" height="307" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-5944" /></p>
<p><img src="http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/files/2009/11/netbook-laptop-premium-reliability.PNG" alt="" /></p>
<p>Another notable trend becomes clear when comparing brands. Here&#8217;s the list of nine different brands, ranked from most reliable to least, in terms of malfunction rate:</p>
<p><img src="http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/files/2009/11/laptop-brand-reliability.PNG" alt="laptop-brand-reliability" width="543" height="350" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-5945" /></p>
<ol>
<li>Asus</li>
<li>Toshiba</li>
<li>Sony</li>
<li>Apple</li>
<li>Dell</li>
<li>Lenovo</li>
<li>Acer</li>
<li>Gateway</li>
<li>HP</li>
</ol>
<p>Looks like <a href="http://everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/tag/asus/">Asus</a>&#8216; marketing department have a new talking point to advertise, while <a href="http://everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/tag/apple/">Apple</a> has another reason to stick its nose up at <a href="http://everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/tag/dell/">Dell</a>. I&#8217;m also sure <a href="http://everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/tag/sony/">Sony</a> would like to mention being second in reliability while pimping its stylish VAIO lines.</p>
<p>The most depressing trend noted, while somewhat obvious, is still a bit depressing: From an average of 7.2% after 12 months of ownership, the average rate of &#8220;total failure&#8221; rises to 19.7% after 24 months, and steadily rises to 31% by the third year.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/files/2009/11/laptop-reliability-over-time.PNG" alt="laptop-reliability-over-time" width="545" height="323" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-5946" /></p>
<p>Great info from Squaretrade, relevant to makers and consumers alike. What I&#8217;d like to see though is a survey on the reliability of <em>desktops</em>. In any case, do you own a laptop? How reliable (or not) has it proven to be?</p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog">The Gadget Blog</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/asus-tops-laptop-reliability-study/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Matters More Than National Average Broadband Speed</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/what-matters-more-than-national-average-broadband-speed/</link>
		<comments>http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/what-matters-more-than-national-average-broadband-speed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 17:39:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rico Mossesgeld</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ramblings of a Gadget Geek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[average broadband speed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[by country]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reliability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uplink speed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[upload speed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[what's more important]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thegadgetblog.com/2008/08/16/what-matters-more-than-national-average-broadband-speed/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
The USA may be the king of gadgets. But compared to countries like Japan and Korea, the country&#8217;s average broadband speed is a bit lacking.
But then, you probably know this. After all, this was well-discussed last year. The real question is: does the US really need a high average broadband speed? 
In the first place, you&#8217;ve got people like Christopher Null arguing that boosting the US&#8217; broadband capacity is currently an impracticality:
Is it really that bad? Sure, I&#8217;d love to have the 60-plus megabits per second that the average Japanese broadband subscriber has access to, but the logistics of offering [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog">The Gadget Blog</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src='http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/files/2008/08/patra-teimesgrnetgr-day.png' alt='patra-teimesgrnetgr-day.png' /></p>
<p>The USA may be <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/2008/07/04/the-mandatory-fourth-of-july-2008-post/">the king of gadgets</a>. But compared to countries like Japan and Korea, the country&#8217;s average broadband speed is a bit lacking.</p>
<p>But then, you probably know this. After all, this <a href="http://digg.com/tech_news/Average_broadband_speed_by_country_graph">was well-discussed last year</a>. The real question is: does the US really need a high average broadband speed? <span id="more-2555"></span></p>
<p>In the first place, you&#8217;ve got people like Christopher Null arguing that boosting the US&#8217; broadband capacity <a href="http://tech.yahoo.com/blogs/null/101686/the-challenges-of-increasing-broadband-speed-in-the-us/">is currently an impracticality</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Is it really that bad? Sure, I&#8217;d love to have the 60-plus megabits per second that the average Japanese broadband subscriber has access to, but the logistics of offering such a service on a national scale in a country as large as the U.S. are nightmarish. The U.S. is 25 times larger in area than Japan, and 96 times larger than South Korea, the other big broadband high-flyer.</p></blockquote>
<p>Impracticalities aside, the figure for the US this year, 4.9 Mbps, isn&#8217;t shabby at all. That translates to around 600 kb/s, or 0.6 megabytes a second. That equals 20 minutes to download the entire contents of a 700MB CD. So other countries do it faster. Again, so?</p>
<p>What&#8217;s more important than speed are:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Reliability.</strong> What&#8217;s the point of being fast, when you can&#8217;t that expect that speed to be available for 99% of the time?</li>
<li><strong>Upload speeds.</strong> So far, &#8220;speed&#8221; meant how fast people can download content. While that&#8217;s important to the success of the web, another crucial aspect is how people can quickly share content with each other. Upload speeds play a huge role in this.
</li>
</ul>
<p>So while the comparatively low broadband speeds of the US have <a href="http://us.lrd.yahoo.com/_ylt=AvpPXQlvhORbloT6stqsigotMZA5/SIG=14cmqa041/**http%3A//www.ecommercetimes.com/story/You-Call-That-Broadband-Group-Decries-Plodding-Pace-of-US-Net-Speed-64157.html%3Fwelcome=1218733431">attracted criticism</a>, it doesn&#8217;t necessarily represent the US getting left behind in the online world.</p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog">The Gadget Blog</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/what-matters-more-than-national-average-broadband-speed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>