<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Gadget Blog &#187; Video cards</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/tag/video-cards/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog</link>
	<description>Gadget News - Gadget Reviews - Gadget Tech Specs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 06:51:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The Super-Powerful ATI Radeon HD 5870</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/the-super-powerful-ati-radeon-hd-5870/</link>
		<comments>http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/the-super-powerful-ati-radeon-hd-5870/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 03:51:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rico Mossesgeld</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Desktops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peripherals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ATI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GPUs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HD 5000 series]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Radeon HD 5870]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video cards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/?p=5394</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With Intel gaining attention for its new Lynnfield processors, AMD has fired back with its own $100 quad-core. At the same time it has also made strides in the GPU market, recently coming out with the first DirectX 11 compatible video hardware. Here&#8217;s a proclamation that:

ATI now stands unchallenged in Blu-ray audio processing, power consumption, single GPU performance, and performance per watt, DirectX 11, multi-monitor setups, anti-aliasing performance, and anisotropic accuracy. By any measure, the confluence of these qualities easily makes the Radeon HD 5000 the most significant shakeup of the GPU market in the last two years.
Pretty bold assertions, [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog">The Gadget Blog</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With Intel gaining <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/new-intel-core-i5-i7-lynnfield-cpus-now-for-sale/">attention for its new Lynnfield processors</a>, AMD has fired back with its own <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/amd-athlon-ii-x4-620-quad-core-processor-power-for-100/">$100 quad-core</a>. At the same time it has also made strides in the GPU market, recently coming out with the first DirectX 11 compatible video hardware. Here&#8217;s a proclamation that:</p>
<p><img src="http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/files/2009/09/AMD-ATI-Radeon-HD-5870-Card.jpg" alt="AMD-ATI-Radeon-HD-5870-Card" width="475" height="382" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-5396" /></p>
<blockquote><p>ATI now stands unchallenged in Blu-ray audio processing, power consumption, single GPU performance, and performance per watt, DirectX 11, multi-monitor setups, anti-aliasing performance, and anisotropic accuracy. By any measure, the confluence of these qualities easily makes the Radeon HD 5000 the most significant shakeup of the GPU market in the last two years.</p></blockquote>
<p>Pretty bold assertions, but given the detailed rundown of the HD 5000 series capabilities, it&#8217;s easy to see that this argument may have merit. Especially when you consider the benchmarks—measures of performance—pouring in from all over the net:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://techreport.com/articles.x/17618" target="_blank">TechReport</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.pcper.com/article.php?aid=783" target="_blank">PC Perspective</a></li>
<li><a href="http://anandtech.com/video/showdoc.aspx?i=3643&amp;p=1" target="_blank">AnandTech</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.techspot.com/review/198-ati-radeon-hd-5870-review/" target="_blank">TechSpot</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum/hardware-canucks-reviews/23415-sapphire-radeon-hd-5870-1gb-gddr5-review.html" target="_blank">Hardware Canucks</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.tweaktown.com/reviews/2933/sapphire_radeon_hd_5870_1gb_graphics_card/index.html" target="_blank">TweakTown</a></li>
</ul>
<p>But your average joe will probably drool over the HD 5000 series due to its capability to run up to <em>nine</em> concurrent displays. Several-monitor setups have been around for years, but this newfangled &#8220;Eyefinity&#8221; technology makes linking displays to only <em>one</em> video card very easy.</p>
<p>Such performance of course comes at a cost: the ATI Radeon HD 5870 retails for $380 at NewEgg, <a href="http://www.newegg.com/Product/ProductList.aspx?Submit=ENE&amp;DEPA=0&amp;Order=BESTMATCH&amp;Description=HD+5870&amp;x=0&amp;y=0">regardless of what brand you choose</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://icrontic.com/articles/the-secret-sauces-in-atis-new-radeon-hd-5000-gpus">Source</a></p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog">The Gadget Blog</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/the-super-powerful-ati-radeon-hd-5870/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fresh Off the Oven: One Repaired Video Card</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/fresh-off-the-oven-one-repaired-video-card/</link>
		<comments>http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/fresh-off-the-oven-one-repaired-video-card/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 11:30:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rico Mossesgeld</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Desktops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tricks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[baking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GPU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ovens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video cards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/?p=5256</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Baking a video card (as in an oven) to repair it sounds like total idiocy, but there&#8217;s a method to the madness. As anyone with computer hardware experience knows, solder joints sometimes crack over time, cutting the connections between electronic components and causing hardware failure.

Expose those joints to constant heat, in an oven set to 200 to 275 degrees centigrade, and the lead will melt, clearing out any cracks and reconnecting the joints. After the card has seen enough baking, leave it to cool for a few hours, and it should be working once back in a computer.
At least, that&#8217;s [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog">The Gadget Blog</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Baking a video card (<em>as in an oven</em>) to repair it sounds like total idiocy, but there&#8217;s a method to the madness. As anyone with computer hardware experience knows, solder joints sometimes crack over time, cutting the connections between electronic components and causing hardware failure.</p>
<p><a href="http://CourtesyHumus.Name"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-5255" src="http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/files/2009/08/GPUBaking2.jpg" alt="GPUBaking2" width="576" height="384" /></a></p>
<p>Expose those joints to constant heat, in an oven set to 200 to 275 degrees centigrade, and the lead will melt, clearing out any cracks and reconnecting the joints. After the card has seen enough baking, leave it to cool for a few hours, and it should be working once back in a computer.</p>
<p>At least, that&#8217;s the ideal. Advice to achieve optimum results includes not putting the card upside down in the oven, and keeping a watchful eye on the process. Melting solder joints increases the chance of gravity acting on the card chips, causing them to fall off, while it&#8217;s possible to melt the lead too much, leaving unstable connections that may cause short circuits. Oh and of course, don&#8217;t try this on a perfectly functioning video card!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.humus.name/index.php?page=News&amp;ID=283">Source</a></p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog">The Gadget Blog</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/fresh-off-the-oven-one-repaired-video-card/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Your Video Card Buyer&#8217;s Guide for Spring 20</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/your-video-card-buyers-guide-for-spring-20/</link>
		<comments>http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/your-video-card-buyers-guide-for-spring-20/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 19:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rico Mossesgeld</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Desktops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ATI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[buyer's guides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NVIDIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video cards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/?p=3868</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Unless you don&#8217;t believe what the folks over at Anandtech have to say (and they know their stuff), their new video card buyer&#8217;s guide for this North-Hemispherean spring will be quite useful. Especially since it&#8217;s got recommendations for a variety of price points:



Price
Product


$75
ATI Radeon HD 4670
NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT


$100
Wait for a month!


$150
ATI Radeon HD 4850


$165
ATI Radeon HD 4870


$180
An ATI Radeon HD 4870 1GB
NVIDIA GTX 260 Core 216


$180 &#8211; $280
Errr&#8230;


$280 &#8211; $400+
ATI Radeon HD 4850 X2 2GB



Hmmm&#8230; looks like ATI&#8217;s winning the current round of the never-ending battle between the maker and its arch-rival NVIDIA. According to Anandtech lately, that&#8217;s a [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog">The Gadget Blog</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_3874" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 519px"><img class="size-full wp-image-3874" src="http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/files/2009/04/4850x2.png" alt="4850x2" width="509" height="241" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Image courtesy of ATI</p></div>
<p style="text-align: center">Unless you don&#8217;t believe what the folks over at <a href="http://www.anandtech.com/guides/showdoc.aspx?i=3538">Anandtech</a> have to say (and they know their stuff), their new video card buyer&#8217;s guide for this North-Hemispherean spring will be quite useful. Especially since it&#8217;s got recommendations for a variety of price points:</p>
<table style="width: 100%" border="1" cellspacing="1">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Price</th>
<th>Product</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>$75</th>
<td align="center">ATI Radeon HD 4670<br />
NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>$100</th>
<td align="center"><a href="http://www.anandtech.com/guides/showdoc.aspx?i=3538&amp;p=2">Wait for a month</a>!</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>$150</th>
<td align="center">ATI Radeon HD 4850</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>$165</th>
<td align="center">ATI Radeon HD 4870</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>$180</th>
<td align="center">An ATI Radeon HD 4870 1GB<br />
NVIDIA GTX 260 Core 216</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>$180 &#8211; $280</th>
<td align="center"><a href="http://www.anandtech.com/guides/showdoc.aspx?i=3538&amp;p=3">Errr&#8230;</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>$280 &#8211; $400+</th>
<td align="center">ATI Radeon HD 4850 X2 2GB</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Hmmm&#8230; looks like ATI&#8217;s winning the current round of the never-ending battle between the maker and its arch-rival NVIDIA. According to Anandtech lately, that&#8217;s a value-for-money matter, and not performance.</p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog">The Gadget Blog</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/your-video-card-buyers-guide-for-spring-20/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>