<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Gadget Blog &#187; Windows</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/tag/windows/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog</link>
	<description>Gadget News - Gadget Reviews - Gadget Tech Specs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 14:00:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>How OS Fanboys See the World</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/how-os-fanboys-see-the-world/</link>
		<comments>http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/how-os-fanboys-see-the-world/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 11:17:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rico Mossesgeld</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Desktops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geekery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Laptops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[as seen by]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fanboyism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fanboys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[perspectives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/how-os-fanboys-see-the-world/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a life-long Windows user, with a smattering of System 9 and OS X experience, the following table is so true:

For those who can&#8217;t get the symbolism presented (or for those who see the world with their five other senses, and thus need text for their parser to interpret) here&#8217;s a boring text-only version:



Linux
Windows
Mac
As seen by&#8230;


Boring plain vanilla workstation
Blue Screen of Death
Awesome multi-display workstation
Mac Fanboys


Hard-to-understand terminal
Awesome multi-display workstation
A toy for kids, with limited capability
Windows Fanboys


A laptop that&#8217;s literally the center of the universe
Microsoft screwing Windows users over
Steve Jobs holding up a wad of cash
Linux Fanboys



What do you think? Is this [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog">The Gadget Blog</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a life-long Windows user, with a smattering of System 9 and OS X experience, the following table is so true:</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter" src="http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/files/2009/12/fanboys-os.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<p>For those who can&#8217;t get the symbolism presented (or for those who see the world with their five other senses, and thus need text for their parser to interpret) here&#8217;s a boring text-only version:</p>
<table border="1">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Linux</th>
<th>Windows</th>
<th>Mac</th>
<th>As seen by&#8230;</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Boring plain vanilla workstation</td>
<td>Blue Screen of Death</td>
<td>Awesome multi-display workstation</td>
<th>Mac Fanboys</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Hard-to-understand terminal</td>
<td>Awesome multi-display workstation</td>
<td>A toy for kids, with limited capability</td>
<th>Windows Fanboys</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>A laptop that&#8217;s literally the center of the universe</td>
<td>Microsoft screwing Windows users over</td>
<td>Steve Jobs holding up a wad of cash</td>
<th>Linux Fanboys</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>What do you think? Is this OS fanboyism table true or false for you? Credit to <a href="http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/12/20/how-fanboys-see-operating-systems-pic/">Geeks are Sexy</a>!</p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog">The Gadget Blog</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/how-os-fanboys-see-the-world/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thousands of Hotmail Accounts Allegedly Hacked</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/thousands-of-hotmail-accounts-allegedly-hacked/</link>
		<comments>http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/thousands-of-hotmail-accounts-allegedly-hacked/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 14:45:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rico Mossesgeld</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gmail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hotmail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Live Mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Live]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/?p=5505</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Can hotmail users confirm this? According to Neowin, someone posted on pastebin a list of ten-thousand hotmail accounts—complete with corresponding passwords. The list is helpfully sorted from A to B, which for some reason according to Neowin, suggests that other lists are stored somewhere online.
Even if this report turns out to be false, it&#8217;s still a good reminder to change your web email password now, regardless of what service you&#8217;re using. For something that&#8217;s literally the foundation of the online existence of millions, it&#8217;s amazing how few practice good security and change it on a regular basis. For hotmail users, [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog">The Gadget Blog</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can hotmail users confirm this? According to Neowin, someone posted on pastebin a list of ten-thousand hotmail accounts—complete with corresponding passwords. The list is helpfully sorted from A to B, which for some reason according to Neowin, suggests that other lists are stored somewhere online.</p>
<p><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-5506" src="http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/files/2009/10/Windows-Live.jpg" alt="Windows-Live" width="226" height="170" />Even if this report turns out to be false, it&#8217;s still a good reminder to change your web email password <em>now</em>, regardless of what service you&#8217;re using. For something that&#8217;s literally the foundation of the online existence of millions, it&#8217;s amazing how few practice good security and change it on a regular basis. For hotmail users, may I also remind them not to accidentally visit hotmale.com?</p>
<p>Which accounts are affected? According to <a href="http://www.neowin.net/news/main/09/10/05/thousands-of-hotmail-passwords-leaked-online">Neowin</a>: &#8220;Currently it appears only accounts used to access Microsoft&#8217;s Windows Live Hotmail have been posted, this includes @hotmail.com, @msn.com and @live.com accounts&#8221;. The site has done the right thing and contacted Microsoft PR reps in the US and UK to keep them in the loop and possibly elicit feedback regarding the situation.</p>
<p><a href="http://technologyviewer.com/post/205046624/thousands-of-hotmail-passwords-leaked">Technology Viewer</a> suggests that, after those who are allegedly affected change their passwords, they should switch to Gmail ASAP. Personally, I find that sound advice, but I&#8217;m not sure what can be done for online services that don&#8217;t allow email changes.</p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog">The Gadget Blog</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/thousands-of-hotmail-accounts-allegedly-hacked/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Classic: &#8220;Gates Made Ctrl+Alt+Del Famous&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/classic-gates-made-ctrlaltdel-famous/</link>
		<comments>http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/classic-gates-made-ctrlaltdel-famous/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 16:30:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rico Mossesgeld</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Virtual Hilarity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Gates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Classic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ctrl+Alt+Del]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Bradely]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IBM PC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows NT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/?p=5375</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The quality betrays the following video&#8217;s age, but dissing Microsoft for coming out with unreliable OSes is a timeless practice. Here&#8217;s how David Bradely, inventor of Ctrl+Alt+Del, gave Bill Gates the rhetorical smackdown, during the 20th anniversary celebration of the IBM PC:
I honestly wonder what was going through Gates&#8217; head, after Bradely joked that the Microsoft founder was responsible for making the key combination famous (implying of course, the numerous crashes that necessitated Ctrl+Alt+Del)? Was he the socially awkward geek unable to produce a witty comeback? So like yours truly, except for the billions of dollars in net worth of [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog">The Gadget Blog</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The quality betrays the following video&#8217;s age, but dissing Microsoft for coming out with unreliable OSes is a timeless practice. Here&#8217;s how David Bradely, inventor of Ctrl+Alt+Del, gave Bill Gates the rhetorical smackdown, during the 20th anniversary celebration of the IBM PC:</p>
<div class="vidembedwrap"><object width="590" height="442"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/ZiH-iA9EO_Q&ap=%2526fmt%3D18"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/ZiH-iA9EO_Q&ap=%2526fmt%3D18" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="590" height="442"></embed></object></div>
<p>I honestly wonder what was going through Gates&#8217; head, after Bradely joked that the Microsoft founder was responsible for making the key combination famous (implying of course, the numerous crashes that necessitated Ctrl+Alt+Del)? Was he the socially awkward geek unable to produce a witty comeback? So like yours truly, except for the billions of dollars in net worth of course! All I know is that &#8220;we are not amused&#8221; would have been really fitting.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/files/2009/09/Bill-Gates-is-not-Amused.jpg" alt="Bill-Gates-is-not-Amused" width="242" height="242" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-5376" /></p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog">The Gadget Blog</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/classic-gates-made-ctrlaltdel-famous/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chrome OS = Diapers for MS and Apple</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/chrome-os-diapers-for-ms-and-apple/</link>
		<comments>http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/chrome-os-diapers-for-ms-and-apple/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 13:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rico Mossesgeld</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[netbooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrome OS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OS X]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/?p=4852</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[True or false?
Post from: The Gadget Blog
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog">The Gadget Blog</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_4853" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 517px"><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/chrome-os-diapers-for-ms-and-apple/windows-os-x-chrome-os-poop/" rel="attachment wp-att-4853"><img src="http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/files/2009/07/windows-os-x-chrome-os-poop.jpg" alt="Courtesy Joy of Tech" width="507" height="722" class="size-full wp-image-4853" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Courtesy Joy of Tech</p></div>
<p>True or false?</p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog">The Gadget Blog</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/chrome-os-diapers-for-ms-and-apple/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Free Windows 7 Upgrades for OEM PCs</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/free-windows-7-upgrades-for-oem-pcs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/free-windows-7-upgrades-for-oem-pcs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 13:00:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rico Mossesgeld</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Deals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Upgrades]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows 7]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/?p=4717</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Basically, if you&#8217;ve bought a PC that came with certain versions of Vista installed, from June 26, 2009 to January 10, 2010, you get an upgrade to Windows 7 for free! According to the Microsoft Press Release:

&#8220;There is a lot of excitement for Windows 7 in the marketplace today. However, many consumers need a new Windows PC for school, work or home before October 22,&#8221; said Brad Brooks, corporate vice president, Windows consumer marketing at Microsoft. “So starting June 26th, any customer who buys a PC from a participating computer maker or retailer with Windows Vista Home Premium, Business or [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog">The Gadget Blog</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Basically, if you&#8217;ve bought a PC that came with certain versions of Vista installed, from June 26, 2009 to January 10, 2010, you get an upgrade to <a href="http://everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/tag/windows-7">Windows 7</a> for free! According to the <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/Presspass/press/2009/jun09/06-25Windows7UpgradeOptionPR.mspx">Microsoft Press Release</a>:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/free-windows-7-upgrades-for-oem-pcs/windows7-wallpaper/" rel="attachment wp-att-4721"><img src="http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/files/2009/07/windows7-wallpaper-590x368.jpg" alt="windows7-wallpaper" width="590" height="368" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-4721" /></a></p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;There is a lot of excitement for Windows 7 in the marketplace today. However, many consumers need a new Windows PC for school, work or home before October 22,&#8221; said Brad Brooks, corporate vice president, Windows consumer marketing at Microsoft. “So starting June 26th, any customer who buys a PC from a participating computer maker or retailer with Windows Vista Home Premium, Business or Ultimate will also receive an upgrade to the corresponding version of Window 7 at little or no cost.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>In other words, only Vista Home Basic users are exempted from this program. <a href="http://www.microcenter.com/storefronts/microsoft/windows7/index.html">Micro Center</a> has compiled a list of manufacturers included in the program, with relevant links:</p>
<h2>Windows 7 OEM Upgrade Info</h2>
<p><strong>Acer</strong><br />
<a href="www.acer.com/Win7Upgrade">Upgrade Info</a></p>
<p><strong>Averatec</strong><br />
<a href="www.trigem.com/us/event_win7.asp">Upgrade Info</a></p>
<p><strong>Compaq</strong><br />
<a href="www.hp.com/go/windows7upgrade">Upgrade Info</a><br />
<a href="www.hp.com/support">Support Info</a></p>
<p><strong>Dell</strong><br />
<a href="www.dell.com/windows7upgrade">Upgrade Info</a><br />
<a href="www.dell.com/support">Support Info</a></p>
<p><strong>eMachines</strong><br />
<a href="www.emachines.com/windows7upgrade/">Upgrade Info</a></p>
<p><strong>Fujitsu</strong><br />
<a href="www.shopfujitsu.com/Windows7Upgrade">Upgrade Info</a></p>
<p><strong>Gateway</strong><br />
<a href="www.gateway.com/Win7Upgrade">Upgrade Info</a></p>
<p><strong>HP</strong><br />
<a href="www.hp.com/go/windows7upgrade">Upgrade Info</a><br />
<a href="www.hp.com/support">Support Info</a></p>
<p><strong>Lenovo</strong><br />
<a href="www.lenovo.com/us/en/windows7/index.html">Upgrade Info</a><br />
<a href="www.lenovo.com/support">Support Info</a></p>
<p><strong>Retail Box Upgrade</strong><br />
<a href="www.windows.com/upgradeoffers">Upgrade and Support Info</a></p>
<p><strong>Sony</strong><br />
<a href="www.sony.com/windows7">Upgrade Info</a></p>
<p><strong>Toshiba</strong><br />
<a href="laptops.toshiba.com/windows7upgrade">Upgrade Info</a></p>
<p><strong>Velocity Micro</strong><br />
<a href="www.velocitymicro.com">Upgrade and Support Info</a></p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog">The Gadget Blog</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/free-windows-7-upgrades-for-oem-pcs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lauren 2.0 Debuts on Own Laptop Hunters Ad</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/lauren-20-debuts-on-own-laptop-hunters-ad/</link>
		<comments>http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/lauren-20-debuts-on-own-laptop-hunters-ad/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 03:21:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rico Mossesgeld</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Laptops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Laptop Hunters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PCs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/?p=4369</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is it just me, but is the second Lauren Laptop Hunter (the one with mom) cuter than the first?

Video: Laptop Hunters $1700 – Lauren and Sue get a Dell XPS 13

Video: Laptop Hunters $1000 &#8211; Lauren Gets an HP Pavilion
Post from: The Gadget Blog
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog">The Gadget Blog</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it just me, but is the second Lauren Laptop Hunter (the one with mom) cuter than the first?</p>
<p><img src="http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/files/2009/05/lauren-2.jpg" alt="lauren-2" width="590" height="329" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-4372" /></p>
<p><a href="http://video.msn.com/video.aspx?vid=0170090f-53b2-40fc-89a4-c759cb088e0a" target="_new" title="Laptop Hunters $1700 – Lauren and Sue get a Dell XPS 13">Video: Laptop Hunters $1700 – Lauren and Sue get a Dell XPS 13</a></p>
<p><img src="http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/files/2009/05/lauren-1.jpg" alt="lauren-1" width="590" height="329" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-4371" /></p>
<p><a href="http://video.msn.com/video.aspx?vid=0bb6a07c-c829-4562-8375-49e6693810c7" target="_new" title="Laptop Hunters $1000 - Lauren Gets an HP Pavilion">Video: Laptop Hunters $1000 &#8211; Lauren Gets an HP Pavilion</a></p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog">The Gadget Blog</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/lauren-20-debuts-on-own-laptop-hunters-ad/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Laptop Hunter Ads: What do You Think?</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/laptop-hunter-ads-what-do-you-think/</link>
		<comments>http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/laptop-hunter-ads-what-do-you-think/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 15:27:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rico Mossesgeld</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Laptops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Laptop Hunters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/?p=4198</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s the latest one, showing &#8220;Sheila&#8221; supposedly spending $2,000 of Microsoft&#8217;s money to find the perfect laptop for video editing:
Microsoft&#8217;s Laptop Hunter ads have attracted attention online for its subtle attacks on Apple, and as more proof that Microsoft is taking marketing more seriously. Personally, I can easily point out flaws in the Laptop Hunters&#8217; messaging (which is not helped by its simplistic presentation of computer realities), but I doubt if anyone can. The fact remains that Microsoft is starting to become more concerned with appearances, rather than just the cold, technical specs.
Sure, Sheila glosses over the realities of her [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog">The Gadget Blog</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s the latest one, showing &#8220;Sheila&#8221; supposedly spending $2,000 of Microsoft&#8217;s money to find the perfect laptop for video editing:</p>
<div class="vidembedwrap"><object width="590" height="442"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/APQv8JTKM9A&ap=%2526fmt%3D18"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/APQv8JTKM9A&ap=%2526fmt%3D18" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="590" height="442"></embed></object></div>
<p>Microsoft&#8217;s Laptop Hunter ads have attracted attention online for its subtle attacks on Apple, and as more proof that <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/what-do-you-think-of-the-mojave-experiment/">Microsoft is taking marketing more seriously</a>. Personally, I can easily point out flaws in the Laptop Hunters&#8217; messaging (which is not helped by its simplistic presentation of computer realities), but I doubt if anyone can. The fact remains that Microsoft is starting to become more concerned with appearances, rather than just the cold, technical specs.</p>
<p>Sure, Sheila glosses over the realities of her laptop hunt. But that was for the sake of cramming everything into a minute. Besides, how boring would it be for her to boast &#8220;Oh wow, it&#8217;s got workstation-quality dedicated graphics?!?&#8221;. This new appearance-oriented approach apparently extends even to Windows 7, with Gizmodo reporting in its Windows 7 RC 1 benchmarking post:</p>
<blockquote><p>What&#8217;s really interesting is that in regular usage, Windows 7 still feels faster and more responsive than Vista, even though the objective numbers say otherwise. It&#8217;s more than just a simple &#8220;hey, it&#8217;s not Vista&#8221; placebo effect: It points to a slicker, refined user experience that makes you feel like the OS responds more hastily or smoothly to your whims. And that&#8217;s what really matters, more than the numbers.</p></blockquote>
<p>Amen.</p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog">The Gadget Blog</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/laptop-hunter-ads-what-do-you-think/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>So Hypocritical Apple!</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/so-hypocritical-apple/</link>
		<comments>http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/so-hypocritical-apple/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 10:35:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rico Mossesgeld</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Desktops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac OS X]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac vs. PC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac vs. Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WinGeek]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thegadgetblog.com/2008/10/30/so-hypocritical-apple/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
So you come out with a new ad, in response to your competitor&#8217;s attempts to change perceptions over a much-maligned product. Do you concentrate on your strengths, re-highlight your competitor&#8217;s weaknesses, or simply go with a cleverly-worded lie?
Reportedly, Apple decided to go for the latter. In a recent ad, they implied that Microsoft spent more money on marketing their products, rather than improving them. According to WinGeek: &#8220;&#8230;since Apple brought it up, they spend only .7 cents less per sales $1 on Advertising than Microsoft and spend a fraction of what Microsoft spends on improving its products.&#8221; For every dollar [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog">The Gadget Blog</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/fVyTnTdijog&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/fVyTnTdijog&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>
<p>So you come out with a new ad, in response to your competitor&#8217;s attempts to change perceptions over a much-maligned product. Do you concentrate on your strengths, re-highlight your competitor&#8217;s weaknesses, or simply go with a cleverly-worded lie?</p>
<p>Reportedly, Apple decided to go for the latter. In a recent ad, they implied that Microsoft spent more money on marketing their products, rather than improving them. According to WinGeek: &#8220;&#8230;since Apple brought it up, they spend only .7 cents less per sales $1 on Advertising than Microsoft and spend a fraction of what Microsoft spends on improving its products.&#8221; For every dollar Microsoft makes, it spends 13.9% on R&#038;D, compared to Apple&#8217;s 3.3%.</p>
<p>The full dirt—as well as the sources of WinGeek&#8217;s research—are available <a href="http://wingeek.com/articles/39369/fact-checking-apples-latest-ads">here</a>.</p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog">The Gadget Blog</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/so-hypocritical-apple/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>