<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Attack Power Vs. Spell Damage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.everyjoe.com/wowobsessed/attack-power-vs-spell-damage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/wowobsessed/attack-power-vs-spell-damage/</link>
	<description>World of Warcraft Joys and Frustrations - WOW News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 15:47:04 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nécrobone</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/wowobsessed/attack-power-vs-spell-damage/comment-page-1/#comment-721</link>
		<dc:creator>Nécrobone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 23:46:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wowobsessed.com/?p=25#comment-721</guid>
		<description>I Agree their should be a Stacking way for Mages / Locks / Priests / Moonkins to Stack Spell damage pre 60, as with Twinks / Low Levels Melee have a Certain Advantage .. either that or Add some Low Level SP Gear .. this way the Balance should be even no matter what level</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I Agree their should be a Stacking way for Mages / Locks / Priests / Moonkins to Stack Spell damage pre 60, as with Twinks / Low Levels Melee have a Certain Advantage .. either that or Add some Low Level SP Gear .. this way the Balance should be even no matter what level</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rrayzor</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/wowobsessed/attack-power-vs-spell-damage/comment-page-1/#comment-754</link>
		<dc:creator>rrayzor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 17:47:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wowobsessed.com/?p=25#comment-754</guid>
		<description>if they continue to nerf the casters the least they can do is up the value of our armor or give alot more stamina. yeah we&#039;re op&#039;d we cant take the beating like say a warior or death night can so we need the spell power to compete. there has to be an even trade off some where. then there are druids and shawmans that are doing insain amounts of damage and no one is saying anything about it instead of nerfing the clothies hit the leather wearers for a change</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if they continue to nerf the casters the least they can do is up the value of our armor or give alot more stamina. yeah we&#8217;re op&#8217;d we cant take the beating like say a warior or death night can so we need the spell power to compete. there has to be an even trade off some where. then there are druids and shawmans that are doing insain amounts of damage and no one is saying anything about it instead of nerfing the clothies hit the leather wearers for a change</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rustlebutt aoe</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/wowobsessed/attack-power-vs-spell-damage/comment-page-1/#comment-549</link>
		<dc:creator>rustlebutt aoe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 18:36:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wowobsessed.com/?p=25#comment-549</guid>
		<description>i think that it is weird that u get no spell dmg frm intellect but srsly u dont need more spell damage u greedy mages/locks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think that it is weird that u get no spell dmg frm intellect but srsly u dont need more spell damage u greedy mages/locks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Baltorg</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/wowobsessed/attack-power-vs-spell-damage/comment-page-1/#comment-492</link>
		<dc:creator>Baltorg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 22:21:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wowobsessed.com/?p=25#comment-492</guid>
		<description>RU Kidding me?  I&#039;ve been hit by 5k+ Crits &amp; 3k+ hits from Mages &amp; Locks frostbolts &amp; shadowbolts.  (354 Resilience for reference)  Mortal strike, slam, heroic strike is no where remotely near that kinda damage even with maxed out AP.   Spell caster dps is already fine (if not on the OP side), no need to make it completely broken by giving yet another option to do even more insane amounts of damage.  Take a look at your talent trees, the damage buffs are already hands down superior to AP based classes.  Pls consider class balance when making these kind of posts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RU Kidding me?  I&#8217;ve been hit by 5k+ Crits &amp; 3k+ hits from Mages &amp; Locks frostbolts &amp; shadowbolts.  (354 Resilience for reference)  Mortal strike, slam, heroic strike is no where remotely near that kinda damage even with maxed out AP.   Spell caster dps is already fine (if not on the OP side), no need to make it completely broken by giving yet another option to do even more insane amounts of damage.  Take a look at your talent trees, the damage buffs are already hands down superior to AP based classes.  Pls consider class balance when making these kind of posts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angelo</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/wowobsessed/attack-power-vs-spell-damage/comment-page-1/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Angelo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Sep 2007 01:50:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wowobsessed.com/?p=25#comment-9</guid>
		<description>Yeah druids and mages have the lunar guidance and mind mastery talents respectively to increase their spell damage by a percent of their intellect. But as far as increasing them by stats alone, they really don&#039;t have a way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah druids and mages have the lunar guidance and mind mastery talents respectively to increase their spell damage by a percent of their intellect. But as far as increasing them by stats alone, they really don&#8217;t have a way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karine</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/wowobsessed/attack-power-vs-spell-damage/comment-page-1/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Karine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 11:14:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wowobsessed.com/?p=25#comment-7</guid>
		<description>Priests can invest in the improved divine spirit (Disc.) talent points, which increases damage and healing to up to 10% of their spirit. And/or in spiritual guidance (Holy) which increases damage and healing to up to 25% of their spirit.
That&#039;s +35% damage/healing linked to spirit right there. 
But granted, there&#039;s no stat that increases spell power regardless of talent point distribution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Priests can invest in the improved divine spirit (Disc.) talent points, which increases damage and healing to up to 10% of their spirit. And/or in spiritual guidance (Holy) which increases damage and healing to up to 25% of their spirit.<br />
That&#8217;s +35% damage/healing linked to spirit right there.<br />
But granted, there&#8217;s no stat that increases spell power regardless of talent point distribution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ingrid Diaz</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/wowobsessed/attack-power-vs-spell-damage/comment-page-1/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Ingrid Diaz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 14:40:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wowobsessed.com/?p=25#comment-2</guid>
		<description>I was talking about this just the other day. I hate that we don&#039;t have a stat that increases our spell damage. I guess they think we&#039;d be way too OP, but I agree it&#039;s annoying.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was talking about this just the other day. I hate that we don&#8217;t have a stat that increases our spell damage. I guess they think we&#8217;d be way too OP, but I agree it&#8217;s annoying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>