On Greek Debts and Doing What’s Moral

Posted in Politics
Wed, Jul 15 - 9:00 am EST | 3 years ago by
Comments: 3
Be Sociable, Share!
  • Tweet
Use Arrow Keys (← →) to Browse

The Good Life - Greek Debts

The Greek mess is complicated, but in sorting through complex messes it’s useful to start with simpler cases and build up.

All sides in the discussion are appealing to moral considerations about responsibility, fairness, and prudence. Part of the debate is over what those principles mean. An intimately-related part of the debate involves sorting the many parties involved and figuring out what each owes and is owed.

Two pairs of competing moral principles are in conflict:

(1) Always repay your debts, and (2) If you have bad habits, reform your ways,
(3) Show mercy for those in distress and (4) You can’t get wine from a stone.

Here is a simpler case: Consider your ne’er-do-well cousin Stevie. He works sporadically. He lives high on the hog and has much credit card debt, as well as some loans from dodgy characters. Sometimes he tries to cut back on his expenses, but he also has a history of fibbing about his financial condition. He’s also borrowed lots of money from you over the years. Now it’s a family gathering – Stevie shows up, declares he’s broke again and asks for a loan to tide him over.

What’s the right thing to do?

  • Do you (1) point out that Stevie has much debt already and should first manage that before asking for more?
  • Do you (2) insist that before you can consider another loan Stevie needs to get a steady job and show he can control his expenses?
  • Or do you (3) feel an obligation not to be judgmental and to help him out of a jam – isn’t he family, after all?
  • Or will you (4) write Stevie off as a hopeless case, cut your losses, and wish him well on his own?

Stevie is one guy. But we should be able to decide what’s best to do with him before considering more complex cases.

Like the Enron disaster, for example. Enron was a large corporation involved in many private and government partnerships. It had thousands of people dependent upon it for their energy supplies, their jobs, and their investment and retirement incomes. Enron was also mismanaged badly for several years, and as it became more desperate its top management resorted to lying about its finances.

When the Enron excrement hit the fan, what should we have done? Virtually everyone rightly condemned Enron for its misbehavior. Its irresponsible officers were prosecuted for fraud, and its debts were wound up in relatively civil fashion.

So next let’s scale up to Greece and its millions of people. Virtually everyone agrees that the Greek government has handled its economic policy poorly for decades and that it has occasionally lied about its financial state. But we are divided deeply about what to do. What’s different?

Two factors are different. One is the element of compulsion. Stevie cannot force anyone to associate with him, and Enron could not force anyone to do business with it. But the Greek government can decide policies that are backed up by its police and military, including seizing its citizens’ present assets and binding them to debt obligations into the future.

The other factor is the element of collectivism. Governments have the power to set policies that apply universally to their citizens. But an especially robust version of collectivism has been operative in the debates – treating the Greek government as the embodiment of its people, as speaking for all of them, and as having its disposal all of their assets, present and future.

The parties and relationships involved in the Greek mess badly need to be particularized. A first cut of the parties involved will yield something like this:

  1. The Greek government.
  2. Non-Greek economic institutions that have loaned money to the Greek government.
  3. Non-Greek political institutions that want Greece’s continued participation in the Eurozone.
  4. Greeks who’ve chosen to be dependent upon the Greek government for their livelihoods.
  5. Greeks who are living independently and supporting themselves in the private sector.
  6. Greeks who are not yet adults or born.

So if we are asking, Who should reform their ways? or Who should absorb the cost of the debt? and so on – then the answers should vary depending upon whom we are talking about. Not all of the parties responsible in the same way, and some are not responsible at all.

Who should actually pay?

One group is the adults Greeks who are living off the government teat. They made their choices, and they knew or should have known the risks involved. Maybe their government lied to them and made false promises. That’s sad, but they are now in a position analogous to the former Enron employees and investors who had to make other arrangements.

Another group is the central bankers and the private financiers who made the bad loans. They were informed enough to know the reality of the Greek government’s finances, and of course they were counting on political manipulation rather than sound economics to keep the interest payments flowing. They were complicit in the irresponsibility, so they too should absorb the costs.

Another group is the Greek government officers, past and present, who took the irresponsible loans – and those who lied about the state of Greek finances. Any government officers, past or present, who lied should be held accountable for fraud – just as were Enron’s top management. Current administrations often try to avoid responsibility by claiming that they inherited an unfixable mess from previous administrations. Maybe so. But in politics cleaning up after one’s predecessors is part of the job – and if you don’t know how to do that then you shouldn’t be in that line of work.

Fixing the mess should not include using all Greeks’ assets as a piggy-bank to be raided – and this brings us to the next group: those millions of Greeks who are supporting themselves in the private sector and paying their ordinary taxes. They are generally living responsibly, and a key principle of morality is that one does not make the responsible pay for the sins of the irresponsible.

Nor should parents eat their children. Entirely blameless are young Greeks and the millions of Greeks to come, whom many in the current adult generation want to burden with a lifetime of debt and stunted opportunities.

Thomas Piketty and Vinay Kolhatkar come from very different political worlds, but I agree with both of them on this one point. As Piketty puts it:

“The Greeks have, without a doubt, made big mistakes. Until 2009, the government in Athens forged its books. But despite this, the younger generation of Greeks carries no more responsibility for the mistakes of its elders than the younger generation of Germans did in the 1950s and 1960s.”

(I hope that those leftish intellectuals who love Piketty remember that this principle applies also to the history of racism, sexism, and ethnocentrism.)

Greece is a small economic player with huge symbolic significance. Yet there is no good reason why Greece cannot become a prosperous nation. It has an outstanding location, good human capital, and access to knowledge about what has enabled other nations to become successful.

The most important value to be gained from the Greek debt mess is a lesson in moral and political philosophy. Worldwide, government debt is over $60 trillion, most of it driven by the same irresponsible ideas that led to the Greek disaster.

Much of that debt will have to be written off – but it is critically important that only those responsible for the debt pay for it. Shifting any part of the pain to individuals who are innocent and living responsibly is a profound immorality.

Stephen Hicks is the author of Explaining Postmodernism: Skepticism and Socialism from Rousseau to Foucault and of Nietzsche and the Nazis. He blogs at StephenHicks.org. For future columns on The Good Life, feel welcome to send your philosophical questions and moral dilemmas to him at .

Note: If you follow the retail links in this post and make purchases on the site(s), Defy Media may receive a share of the proceeds from your sale through the retailer’s affiliate program.

Keep up with the best of The Good Life below. Click through the gallery to read more from Stephen Hicks.


Nobody likes to lose money, but profit generates polarized attitudes.

Photo by Melpomenem/Getty Images

Money and books

Which is more evil - loving money or books?

Photo by Getty Images

Campus Politics

Universities are political places, but there’s good politics and bad.

Photo by Getty Images


Stephen Hicks discusses the limits to open immigration.

Photo by Jordan Pix/Getty Images


Stephen Hicks explores how to tame religious terrorists.

Photo by Thierry Chesnot/Getty Images


Is education really too expensive?

Photo: monkeybusinessimages / Getty Images


Let's discuss the ethics of having sex with robots.

Photo by Jiri Miklo/Getty Images

Comparing North and Latin America

Stephen Hicks explores why there are such dramatic differences in economic performance between the two Americas?

Photo: Anson_iStock / Getty Images

Free College Tuition Is a Moral Issue

Many successful people did not graduate from college and many unsuccessful people have impressive degrees. So who should go to college? And who should pay for it?

Photo: Rawpixel Ltd / Getty Images


Stephen Hicks explores answers to the question, "How smart and well-read was Adolf Hitler?"


Read Part I and Part II in this series on understanding triggers and microaggression as strategy.


Stephen Hicks weighs in on Greeek debts and doing what's moral.

Free Speech

Times are changing. Is Free Speech Dead in Universities?


Stephen Hicks talks about intelligence, freedom, and who knows what's best for you. Also don't miss his piece entitled, "Are You Smart Enough to Live in a Free Society?


How close is current Keynesian practice to original Keynesian theory? Can we blame Keynes for our current situation?


Philosophy has a reputation for attracting deep thinkers whose quest for wisdom can serve as a model for all of us. And since politics is a major component of the life well lived, what wisdom can philosophy bring to bear on politics? Are philosophers stupid about politics?


Let us share with you the most impressive number of our generation: 600 million. That is how many people have been lifted out of extreme poverty in the last 25 years. Read more about the the problem of poverty.


Controversy has been running high recently over how best to lower the rape rate on campuses. Read Stephen Hicks' piece on Campus Sex and the Anti-Sexiness of the New Authoritarians.


Stephen Hicks weighs in on the economy, deregulation, capitalism and much more.


As with sex and money — and most of the important matters in life — many silly things are said about power. Find out why power does not corrupt, and it's character that matters most.


Cynicism about money in politics is a healthy response to our long history of cronyism, but does money really buy elections?

Schizophrenic Politics

Let’s talk about one reason why politics makes us all a little crazy — its incoherent mix of laws and regulations. So what should governments really do? Read about Our Schizophrenic Politics from Stephen Hicks.

Lifeboat Ethics

Don't miss this two-part series from Stephen Hicks about lifeboat ethics:

Use Arrow Keys (← →) to Browse

Be Sociable, Share!
  • Tweet

Related Posts