Service Guarantees Citizenship (Part III)

Posted in Politics
Mon, Nov 16 - 9:00 am EST | 3 years ago by
Comments: 47
Be Sociable, Share!
  • Tweet
Use Arrow Keys (← →) to Browse

Lines of Departure - Service Guarantees Citizenship

Don’t miss Part I and Part II in this series.

So how do we get from where we are to a form of government such as we’ve been discussing? I don’t know that we necessarily do by any road any of us would especially care to travel, though we might find that road a little less bumpy and potholed than the others we look to be facing.

We had a chance, back in 1781, when the Articles of Confederation were being ratified, and again, in 1789, when the Constitution was being drawn up. There may have been a slight echo of the notion with the Society of the Cincinnati, post-revolution, and also a chance to have done something via the Newburgh Conspiracy, which George Washington suppressed using not much more than sheer force of character.

While the country might have been better off if something like that system had been adopted on any of those occasions, honesty should compel us to admit it might not have, either. After all, the system we did adopt has seen us through a couple of often turbulent centuries. Were it not that, as I mentioned last week, it looks like that system’s time has run, we wouldn’t be talking about this now. At least I wouldn’t.

There are several routes we might take to get us from where we are to where we think we ought to go. These include coup, as discussed here, or recovery from something like total societal breakdown, as discussed here.

Neither of those routes should be undertaken lightly, by which I mean, avoid like the plague as long as possible. Moreover, each is fraught with problems. In the first case, would anyone with two brain cells to rub together really be all that certain that our flag officers, once they had the power in their own fragrant hands, would then turn over political power to mere discharged privates? One doubts. In the latter case, we’re probably not talking about a national restoration but the creation of a bastion or two somewhere, which may or may not survive the rising seas of barbarism around them. In either case, we will not have saved the country.

I don’t have a lot more faith in the prospect of salvation via normal constitutional amendment. It would certainly be legal; it has that going for it. But actually getting enough or our more left wing states to go along? Even if it meant the ruination of our country and civilization if they didn’t?

Especially “if.” Let me tell you a few little somethings I’ve gathered about the bulk of the modern western left: When it comes to societal ruin – ruin of their own societies – their urge to ruin is overwhelming; their instincts are unerring; their energy is inexhaustible, and their ruthlessness is absolute. Wrecking the country and Western civilization would be a feature, not a bug. So go down the list of states and see which thirteen left-dominated states would object. And that’s assuming a two-thirds vote in congress, when rather few congress-critters would qualify under the system and would thus lose their jobs. Frankly, that last item seems to me to make it impossible even to offer a compromise, a twofer, so to speak, where they might get something they want – statehood for DC and Puerto Rico, say – in exchange for ratification of “Service Guarantees Citizenship.”

So, no, except possibly as a result of a military coup, where the amendment process was forced through at bayonet point (unconstitutional in itself, of course, though there is that nasty precedent of the formerly seceded states and the reconstruction amendments), it cannot get through as an amendment to take effect immediately..

Hopeless, then, right?

Well, no, it isn’t necessarily hopeless. I can see two ways to do it. The first is, despite what I wrote above, through the amendment process. No, neither liberal states’ non-veteran legislators nor national non-veteran senators and representatives would go along…if it affected them, personally. There is, however, a thing called grandfathering. It’s used all the time to try to get some good in the future without paying the political price for it in the present. With grandfathering, everyone currently entitled to vote or run for and hold public office wouldn’t lose those rights, but everyone below the age of eighteen would have to volunteer for and serve their term before they could. Whether that would be enough to save the country…well…I did mention previously, did I not, that the percentages that are leading us to ruin are not that great? It might be enough. Guaranteed? No, I only look stupid and then only when I drink, and that’s been years. But it could be a chance.

The other way is easier to effect, could also be grandfathered, but is also easier to modify or dispense with than actual amendment to the Constitution.

Watch this:

Now go look at YouTube for any of a large number of “bring back the draft,” statements, claims, and suggested programs. Note that what they tend to have in common is that the proponents seek to make the military less usable. This could be a good or bad thing, if true. However, I don’t think it is true. To a large extent they seem to be caught up in their own lies and ideological myths about the makeup of the armed forces in Vietnam. Only a not particularly large minority of troops in Vietnam were draftees. Most were volunteers.1

Now picture a universal draft enacted into law. Men, women, the handicapped; everybody gets a draft notice on their 18th birthday. And they’d better show up, too, on penalty of…not very much really…umm, absolutely nothing really. No jail time, certainly. No fine, to be sure. No end date. No drop dead date. No penalty at all except that you can’t vote or run for and hold public office until you complete your service. Civilized, is it not? Democratic, too, isn’t it? And choice, oh, dear God, choice just abounds.

Tugs at the heartstrings, doesn’t it?

And that’s the best I can offer.

__________

1 https://history-world.org/vietnam_war_statistics.htm

Photo by Andrey Popov/Getty Images

Tom Kratman is a retired infantry lieutenant colonel, recovering attorney, and science fiction and military fiction writer. His latest novel, The Rods and the Axe, is available from Amazon.com for $9.99 for the Kindle version, or $25 for the hardback. A political refugee and defector from the People’s Republic of Massachusetts, he makes his home in Blacksburg, Virginia. He holds the non-exclusive military and foreign affairs portfolio for EveryJoe. Tom’s books can be ordered through baen.com.

Note: If you follow the retail links in this post and make purchases on the site(s), Defy Media may receive a share of the proceeds from your sale through the retailer’s affiliate program.

Don’t miss Tom Kratman’s other Lines of Departure columns. Click through the gallery below to read more.


Social Justice

Don't miss this three-part series on our social justice armed forces.

Photo by zabelin/Getty Images

Women in the Military

Should women be required to register for the draft? Step right up, ladies!

Photo by Getty Images

The Kurds

Tom Kratman sounds off on our gallant allies, the Kurds, and other fairy tales.

Photo by John Moore/Getty Images

Sorry Rodney

Tom Kratman explores Islam and why we just can't get along. Read Part I, II and III of this series.

Photo by Retrovizor/Getty Images

Service Guarantees Citizenship

Read this three-part series from Tom Kratman, inspired by Starship Troopers: Part I, II and III.

Photo by Marko Marcello/Getty Images

Immigration

Tom Kratman explores why immigration doesn't work like it used to.

Gun-Free Zones

Tom Kratman discusses military gun-free zones and the ill-logic of the Left.

Dear Germany

Read this open letter to Germany regarding the "refugee" crisis.

Photo by Adam Berry/Getty Images

Sanctuary Cities

Tom Kratman explores the real problem with sanctuary cities.

Gun-Free Zones

Tom Kratman discusses military "gun-free" zones and the ill-logic of the Left.

Price in Blood

Recently President Obama announced that the government would no longer threaten prosecution of those who pay ransom privately for the return of kidnapped loved ones. Read about the possible effects of Obama's ransom order.

Torture

Read Kratman's two-part series on torture:

Jade Helm 15

Don't miss this three-part series on Jade Helm 15. Is it necessary and should Americans be worried about it? Read: Part I, Part II and Part III.

Does China Really Want War?

Read Part I, II and III in Tom Kratman's series about the possibility of war with China.

Breakup of the United States

Be sure to read Tom Kratman's five-part series on the breakup of the United States:

The Bergdahl Case

If found guilty, should Bowe Bergdahl be sentenced to death?

U.S. Navy

No matter what you've read elsewhere, no -- our Navy is not big enough.

Military Chow

Read Tom Kratman's three part series on military food:

The Soldier's Load

Tom Kratman's series on the average American soldier's load is a must-read. Don't miss:

The Left and the Military

Ever wonder why the Left concentrates so closely on using the military to promote social change? Read part 1 and part 2 from Tom Kratman about the Left and the military.

Defining Terrorism

Don't miss Col. Kratman's five-part series on terrorism:

Humanitarian Assistance

Why does the military – not just ours, everyone’s, or everyone’s that matters – get tapped for disaster relief and humanitarian assistance over and over and over again? Read this column on the military and humanitarian aid to find out.

Why War Games Fail

It's another Lieutenant Reilly story. This time, we are talking about war games and why they fail. Read part 1 and part 2 in this series.

Military Integrity

Unfortunately dishonesty, fraud and a lack of integrity are sometimes not just accepted in the military, they are expected. Read this poignant piece about military integrity.

Arab Armies

Read this Lines of Departure column from Tom Kratman to find out why Arab armies are so generally worthless.

The Purpose of War

A military is about more than self-preservation. Security is a principle of war; safety is not. Risk is in the soldier’s job description. Read: The Purpose of War is to Win.
Use Arrow Keys (← →) to Browse

Be Sociable, Share!
  • Tweet

Related Posts